Functional Difference Between Membrane-bound and Soluble Human Thrombomodulin

Background For successful xenotransplantation, in addition to &agr;1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout and human complement regulatory protein (CD46, CD55, CD59) gene insertion, cloned pigs expressing human thrombomodulin (hTM) have been produced to solve the problem of molecular incompatibility in their coagulation system. Recombinant soluble hTM (S-hTM) which has been recently approved for treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation might be potentially available. The purpose of this study is to examine the functional difference in endothelial cells between membrane-bound hTM (MB-hTM) and S-hTM and to elucidate effective strategy using both types of hTM. Methods The following factors regarding coagulation and inflammation were compared between hTM-expressing pig aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) derived from cloned pig and nontransgenic PAEC in the presence of S-hTM under tumor necrosis factor-&agr;–activated conditions; (i) clotting time (ii) pig tissue factor (TF), (iii) pig E-selectin, (iv) direct prothrombinase activity, (v) activated protein C (APC), and (vi) prothrombinase activity. Results The MB-hTM significantly suppressed the expression of pig TF and E-selectin and direct prothrombinase activity in tumor necrosis factor-&agr;–activated PAEC, suggesting strong anti-inflammatory effect, compared to S-hTM. In contrast, S-hTM had more potent capacity to inhibit thrombin generation and to produce APC than MB-hTM, although MB-hTM had the same level of capacity as human endothelial cells. Conclusions It was speculated that S-hTM treatment would be of assistance during high-risk periods for excessive thrombin formation (e.g., ischemia reperfusion injury or severe infection/rejection). Considering the properties of MB-hTM exhibiting anti-inflammatory function as well as APC production, hTM-expressing cloned pigs might be indispensible to long-term stabilization of graft endothelial cells.