Biological apatite (BAp) c-axis orientation strongly depends on stress distribution in vivo and tends to align along the principal stress direction in bones. Dentulous mandible is subjected to a complicated stress condition in vivo during chewing but few studies have been carried out on the BAp c-axis orientation; so the adaptation of BAp crystal orientation to stress distribution was examined in rat dentulous mandible during bone growth and mastication. Female SD rats 4 to 14 weeks old were prepared, and the bone mineral density (BMD) and BAp crystal orientation were analyzed in a cross-section of mandible across the first molar focusing on two positions: separated from and just under the tooth root on the same cross-section perpendicular to the mesiodistal axis. The degree of BAp orientation was analyzed by a microbeam X-ray diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation equipped with a detector of curved one-dimensional PSPC and two-dimensional PSPC in the reflection and transmission optics, respectively. BMD quickly increased during bone growth up to 14 weeks, although it was independent of the position from the tooth root. In contrast, BAp crystal orientation strongly depended on the age and the position from the tooth root, even in the same cross-section and direction, especially along the mesiodistal and the biting axes. With increased biting stress during bone growth, the degree of BAp orientation increased along the mesiodistal axis in a position separated from the tooth root more than that near the tooth root. In contrast, BAp preferential alignment clearly appeared along the biting axis near the tooth root. We conclude that BAp orientation rather than BMD sensitively adapts to local stress distribution, especially from the chewing stress in vivo in the mandible.
[1]
T. Adachi,et al.
Two-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Preferential Alignment of BAp c-axis for Isolated Human Trabecular Bone Using Microbeam X-ray Diffractometer with a Transmission Optical System
,
2007
.
[2]
Tsutomu Nomura,et al.
Micromechanics/structure relationships in the human mandible.
,
2003,
Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[3]
Y. Tabata,et al.
Unique alignment and texture of biological apatite crystallites in typical calcified tissues analyzed by microbeam X-ray diffractometer system.
,
2002,
Bone.
[4]
W. Landis.
The strength of a calcified tissue depends in part on the molecular structure and organization of its constituent mineral crystals in their organic matrix.
,
1995,
Bone.
[5]
J. Elliott,et al.
Structure and chemistry of the apatites and other calcium orthophosphates
,
1994
.
[6]
N. Sasaki,et al.
Orientation of bone mineral and its role in the anisotropic mechanical properties of bone--transverse anisotropy.
,
1989,
Journal of biomechanics.
[7]
R. Griffiths,et al.
Orientation of apatite crystals in relation to muscle attachment in the mandible.
,
1980,
Journal of biomechanics.