A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

[1]  M. Menon,et al.  Discharge patterns after radical prostatectomy in the United States of America. , 2013, Urologic oncology.

[2]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Impact of the introduction of a robotic training programme on prostate cancer stage migration at a single tertiary referral centre , 2013, BJU international.

[3]  M. Menon,et al.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[4]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume. , 2012, Urologic oncology.

[5]  M. Menon,et al.  Does partial nephrectomy at an academic institution result in better outcomes? , 2012, World Journal of Urology.

[6]  C. Schoen,et al.  Geographic variation in access to care--the relationship with quality. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Gawande.  Two hundred years of surgery. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  D. Berwick,et al.  Eliminating waste in US health care. , 2012, JAMA.

[9]  M. Menon,et al.  Improvement of racial disparities with respect to the utilization of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States , 2012, Cancer.

[10]  A. Vickers,et al.  Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[11]  V. Laudone,et al.  How do you know if you are any good? A surgeon performance feedback system for the outcomes of radical prostatectomy. , 2012, European urology.

[12]  J. McCabe,et al.  UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database , 2012, BJU international.

[13]  N. Lawrentschuk,et al.  Consumerism and its impact on robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy , 2011, BJU international.

[14]  M. Menon,et al.  Radical prostatectomy at academic versus nonacademic institutions: a population based analysis. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[15]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Utilization and expense of adjuvant cancer therapies following radical prostatectomy , 2011, Cancer.

[16]  A. Haese*,et al.  The impact of surgical experience on total hospital charges for minimally invasive prostatectomy: a population‐based study , 2011, BJU international.

[17]  David C. Miller,et al.  Regional collaboration to improve radiographic staging practices among men with early stage prostate cancer. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[18]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Population‐based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity , 2011, BJU international.

[19]  M. Graefen,et al.  Impact of annual surgical volume on length of stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive prostatectomy: a population-based study. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  A. Haese*,et al.  Impact of caseload on total hospital charges: a direct comparison between minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy--a population based study. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[21]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center. , 2011, European urology.

[22]  A. Haese*,et al.  Impact of Surgical Experience on In-Hospital Complication Rates in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy: A Population-Based Study , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[23]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Determinants of performing radical prostatectomy pelvic lymph node dissection and the number of lymph nodes removed in elderly men. , 2011, Urology.

[24]  J. McCabe,et al.  Radical prostatectomy practice in England. , 2010, Urology journal.

[25]  J. Kaouk,et al.  The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[26]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. , 2010, JAMA.

[27]  P. Javlé,et al.  Impact of Hospital Provider Volume on Outcome for Radical Urological Cancer Surgery in England , 2010, Urologia Internationalis.

[28]  Sam S. Chang,et al.  Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. , 2010, Urologic oncology.

[29]  W. Lowrance,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[30]  M. Kattan,et al.  The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[31]  P. Scardino,et al.  Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[32]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  A. Vickers,et al.  Low annual caseloads of United States surgeons conducting radical prostatectomy. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[34]  S. Herrell,et al.  Immediate surgical outcomes for radical prostatectomy in the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Data Base: the impact of hospital case volume, hospital size and geographical region on 48 000 patients , 2009, BJU international.

[35]  J. Eastham.  Do high-volume hospitals and surgeons provide better care in urologic oncology? , 2009, Urologic oncology.

[36]  C. Rosser,et al.  Radical Prostatectomy: Hospital volumes and surgical volumes – does practice make perfect? , 2009, BMC surgery.

[37]  Andrew J Vickers,et al.  The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[38]  M. Kattan,et al.  Preoperative and postoperative nomograms incorporating surgeon experience for clinically localized prostate cancer , 2009, Cancer.

[39]  A. Darzi,et al.  Assessing the quality of the volume‐outcome relationship in uro‐oncology , 2009, BJU international.

[40]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Understanding and reducing variation in surgical mortality. , 2009, Annual review of medicine.

[41]  Y. Taylor,et al.  The Effect of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on Racial Differences in Recurrence-Free Survival After Radical Prostatectomy , 2008, Medical care.

[42]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2008, European urology.

[43]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Urology.

[44]  T. Wilt,et al.  Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[45]  U. Capitanio,et al.  High surgical volume is associated with a lower rate of secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer , 2008, BJU international.

[46]  G. Tomlinson,et al.  Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on mortality and complications after prostatectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[47]  M. Kattan,et al.  Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[48]  David C. Miller,et al.  Understanding differences between high and low volume hospitals for radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Urologic oncology.

[49]  M. Kattan,et al.  Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique. , 2008, European urology.

[50]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Trends in regionalization of inpatient care for urological malignancies, 1988 to 2002. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[52]  J. Verne,et al.  Patient outcomes and length of hospital stay after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: analysis of Hospital Episodes Statistics for England , 2007, BJU international.

[53]  E. Elm,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.

[54]  M. Kattan,et al.  The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[55]  A. Haese*,et al.  Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients , 2006 .

[56]  A. Neugut,et al.  High radical prostatectomy surgical volume is related to lower radical prostatectomy total hospital charges. , 2006, European urology.

[57]  John T. Wei,et al.  Volume-based referral for cancer surgery: informing the debate. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  Eric L Eisenstein,et al.  Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[59]  B. Konety,et al.  The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urological cancer therapy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[60]  David Gillatt,et al.  A description of radical nephrectomy practice and outcomes in England: 1995–2002 , 2005, BJU international.

[61]  C. Begg,et al.  Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[62]  B. Konety,et al.  The volume/outcome relationship in urologic cancer surgery. , 2004, Supportive cancer therapy.

[63]  John T. Wei,et al.  Patient, surgeon, and treatment characteristics associated with homologous blood transfusion requirement during radical retropubic prostatectomy: multivariate nomogram to assist patient counseling. , 2004, Urology.

[64]  B. Trock,et al.  The effect of hospital volume on cancer control after radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[65]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[66]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  The contemporary management of prostate cancer in the United States: lessons from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor (CapSURE), a national disease registry. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[67]  Victor Reuter,et al.  Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[68]  C. Begg,et al.  The Effect of Clustering of Outcomes on the Association of Procedure Volume and Surgical Outcomes , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[69]  S. Mehta,et al.  Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[70]  Colin B Begg,et al.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[71]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States , 2002 .

[72]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. , 2001, Surgery.

[73]  Kathleen M. Terry,et al.  The Use of Quality Indicators for Assessing Radical Prostatectomy Specimens , 2000, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[74]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[75]  A Milstein,et al.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. , 2000, JAMA.

[76]  S. Yao,et al.  Population-based study of relationships between hospital volume of prostatectomies, patient outcomes, and length of hospital stay. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[77]  K. Eagle,et al.  Elderly patients at highest risk with acute myocardial infarction are more frequently transferred from community hospitals to tertiary centers: reality or myth? , 1999, American heart journal.

[78]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Thirty-day mortality rates and cumulative survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1998, Urology.

[79]  M. Kattan,et al.  Impact of a clinical pathway for radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1998, Urology.

[80]  J. Bailar.  The promise and problems of meta-analysis. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[81]  C. Roehrborn,et al.  Radical retropublc prostatectomy for localized carcinoma of the prostate in a large metropolitan hospital: Changing trends over a 10-year period (1984–1994) , 1995 .

[82]  N. Roos,et al.  Use of claims data systems to evaluate health care outcomes. Mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy. , 1987, JAMA.

[83]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[84]  G. Maddern,et al.  Radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the impact of hospital and surgeon volume on patient outcome , 2010, ANZ journal of surgery.

[85]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[86]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Multi-institutional study of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2008, European urology.