Factoring past exposure in display advertising targeting

Online advertising is becoming more and more performance oriented where the decision to show an advertisement to a user is made based on the user's propensity to respond to the ad in a positive manner, (e.g., purchasing a product, subscribing to an email list). The user response depends on how well the ad campaign matches to the user's interest, as well as the amount of user's past exposure to the campaign - a factor shown to be impactful in controlled experimental studies. Past exposure builds brand-awareness and familiarity with the user, which in turn leads to a higher propensity of the user to buy/convert on the ad impression. In this paper we propose a model of the user response to an ad campaign as a function of both the interest match and the past exposure, where the interest match is estimated using historical search/browse activities of the user. The goal of this paper is two-fold. First, we demonstrate the role played by the user interest and the past exposure in modeling user response by jointly estimating the parameters of these factors. We test this response model over hundreds of real ad campaigns. Second, we use the findings from this joint model to identify more relevant target users for ad campaigns. In particular, we show that on real advertising data this model combines past exposure together with the user profile to identify better target users over the conventional targeting models.

[1]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  A Compression Framework for Generating User Profiles , 2010 .

[3]  Joaquin Quiñonero Candela,et al.  Web-Scale Bayesian Click-Through rate Prediction for Sponsored Search Advertising in Microsoft's Bing Search Engine , 2010, ICML.

[4]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  User browsing models: relevance versus examination , 2010, KDD.

[5]  John F. Canny,et al.  Large-scale behavioral targeting , 2009, KDD.

[6]  Navdeep S. Sahni Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments , 2015 .

[7]  Foster Provost,et al.  Audience selection for on-line brand advertising: privacy-friendly social network targeting , 2009, KDD.

[8]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  The Effect of Banner Advertising on Internet Purchasing , 2006 .

[9]  Wen Zhang,et al.  How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising? , 2009, WWW '09.

[10]  Vahab S. Mirrokni,et al.  Mining advertiser-specific user behavior using adfactors , 2010, WWW '10.

[11]  Adwait Ratnaparkhi,et al.  Ranking for the conversion funnel , 2010, SIGIR '10.

[12]  Navdeep S. Sahni ect of Temporal Spacing between Advertising Exposures : Evidence from an Online Field Experiment , 2011 .

[13]  Rajesh Parekh,et al.  Large-Scale Customized Models for Advertisers , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[14]  Sanjay Ghemawat,et al.  MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters , 2004, OSDI.

[15]  Xiang Fang,et al.  An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect , 2007 .

[16]  John F. Canny,et al.  Factor Modeling for Advertisement Targeting , 2009, NIPS.

[17]  Erik Vee,et al.  Personalized Ad Delivery When Ads Fatigue: An Approximation Algorithm , 2007, WINE.

[18]  James A. Hanley,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves , 2005 .

[19]  Wei Li,et al.  Exploitation and exploration in a performance based contextual advertising system , 2010, KDD.