Who Cooperates in Repeated Games: The Role of Altruism, Inequity Aversion, and Demographics

We explore the extent to which altruism, as measured by giving in a dictator game (DG), accounts for play in a noisy version of the repeated prisoner's dilemma. We find that DG giving is correlated with cooperation in the repeated game when no cooperative equilibria exist, but not when cooperation is an equilibrium. Furthermore, none of the commonly observed strategies are better explained by inequity aversion or efficiency concerns than money maximization. Various survey questions provide additional evidence for the relative unimportance of social preferences. We conclude that cooperation in repeated games is primarily motivated by long-term payoff maximization and that even though some subjects may have other goals, this does not seem to be the key determinant of how play varies with the parameters of the repeated game. In particular, altruism does not seem to be a major source of the observed diversity of play.

[1]  David G. Rand,et al.  What Does 'Clean' Really Mean? The Implicit Framing of Decontextualized Experiments , 2013 .

[2]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  C. D. De Dreu Human Cooperation , 2013, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[4]  David G. Rand,et al.  Religious motivations for cooperation: an experimental investigation using explicit primes , 2014 .

[5]  Tore Ellingsen,et al.  Social framing effects: Preferences or beliefs? , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..

[6]  Axel Franzen,et al.  The external validity of giving in the dictator game , 2012 .

[7]  David G. Rand,et al.  Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games , 2012, Experimental Economics.

[8]  Dirk Engelmann How not to extend models of inequality aversion , 2012 .

[9]  David G. Rand,et al.  Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  J. Kagel,et al.  Other Regarding Preferences: A Selective Survey of Experimental Results , 2012 .

[11]  Timothy M. Waring,et al.  Are religious individuals more generous, trusting, and cooperative? An experimental test of the effect of religion on prosociality , 2011 .

[12]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Fairness, Risk Preferences and Independence: Impossibility Theorems , 2011 .

[13]  Guillaume Fréchette,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games: Experimental Evidence , 2011 .

[14]  Fairness and Independence: An Impossibility Theorem , 2011 .

[15]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  A Within-Subject Analysis of Other-Regarding Preferences , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[16]  Marianne Bertrand,et al.  New Perspectives on Gender , 2011 .

[17]  Iese Business School Intrinsic and Instrumental Reciprocity : An Experimental Study , 2011 .

[18]  Daniel Houser,et al.  Fairness and Cheating , 2011 .

[19]  David G. Rand,et al.  Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World , 2010 .

[20]  M. Krawczyk,et al.  ‘Give me a chance!’ An experiment in social decision under risk , 2010 .

[21]  David G. Rand,et al.  The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.

[22]  Lisa R. Anderson,et al.  Did the Devil Make Them Do it? The Effects of Religion in Public Goods and Trust Games , 2010 .

[23]  Christoph Engel,et al.  Dictator games: a meta study , 2010 .

[24]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Slow to Anger and Fast to Forget: Leniency and Forgiveness in an Uncertain World , 2010 .

[25]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Experimental economics: Where next? , 2010 .

[26]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Experimental Economics: Where Next? Rejoinder , 2010 .

[27]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[28]  Lisa R. Anderson,et al.  Religion and cooperation in a public goods experiment , 2009 .

[29]  Ernesto Reuben,et al.  Revisiting strategic versus non-strategic cooperation , 2009, Experimental Economics.

[30]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  On inequity aversion: A reply to Binmore and Shaked , 2009 .

[31]  A. Cabrales,et al.  Social Preferences and Strategic Uncertainty: An Experiment on Markets and Contracts , 2009 .

[32]  Pierpaolo Battigalli,et al.  Dynamic Psychological Games , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[33]  A. Falk,et al.  Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants and Behavioral Consequences , 2009 .

[34]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[35]  Simon Gächter,et al.  Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  I. van Beest,et al.  Initial Ownership in Bargaining: Introducing the Giving, Splitting, and Taking Ultimatum Bargaining Game , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[37]  Charles Bellemare,et al.  MEASURING INEQUITY AVERSION IN A HETEROGENEOUS POPULATION USING EXPERIMENTAL DECISIONS AND SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES , 2008 .

[38]  N. Bardsley Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? , 2008 .

[39]  David G. Rand,et al.  Winners don’t punish , 2008, Nature.

[40]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Behavioural Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World , 2008 .

[41]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment , 2008 .

[42]  Stephan Meier,et al.  Do People Behave in Experiments as in the Field? Evidence from Donations , 2006 .

[43]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Sex and Risk: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[44]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[45]  M. Krawczyk,et al.  Social decisions under risk. Evidence from the probabilistic dictator game , 2008 .

[46]  J. List On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[47]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[48]  J. List The Behavioralist Meets the Market: Measuring Social Preferences and Reputation Effects in Actual Transactions , 2005 .

[49]  Jonathan H. W. Tan,et al.  Religion and social preferences: An experimental study , 2006 .

[50]  Daniel Friedman,et al.  Revealed Altruism , 2005 .

[51]  Uwe Sunde,et al.  Individual Risk Attitudes: New Evidence from a Large, Representative, Experimentally-Validated Survey , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[52]  BÓ Pedrodal,et al.  Cooperation under the Shadow of the Future : Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games , 2005 .

[53]  Christian Thöni,et al.  Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence , 2004 .

[54]  L. Ross,et al.  The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[55]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Giving to Secular Causes by the Religious and Nonreligious: An Experimental Test of the Responsiveness of Giving to Subsidies , 2004 .

[56]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[57]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[58]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Rebates Versus Matching: Does How We Subsidize Charitable Contributions Matter? , 2003 .

[59]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Trust And Reciprocity , 2003 .

[60]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  A Nation-Wide Laboratory: Examining Trust and Trustworthiness by Integrating Behavioral Experiments into Representative Survey , 2003 .

[61]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Trust and reciprocity : interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research , 2003 .

[62]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  A Nation-Wide Laboratory - Examining trust and trustworthiness by integrating behavioral experimen , 2003 .

[63]  P. Bó Cooperation under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games , 2005 .

[64]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Measuring Social Norms and Preferences Using Experimental Games: A Guide for Social Scientists , 2002 .

[65]  T. Kasser,et al.  Materialistic values and well‐being in business students , 2002 .

[66]  M. Rabin,et al.  UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL PREFERENCES WITH SIMPLE TESTS , 2001 .

[67]  Jordi Brandts,et al.  Reference Points and Negative Reciprocity in Simple Sequential Games , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[68]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Fair Procedures: Evidence from Games Involving Lotteries , 2000 .

[69]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Evidence from Games Involving Lotteries , 2000 .

[70]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  Children's altruism in public good and dictator experiments , 2000 .

[71]  Edward,et al.  Measuring Trust , 2000 .

[72]  D. Levine Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments , 1998 .

[73]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[74]  Ulrich Kamecke,et al.  Rotations: Matching schemes that efficiently preserve the best reply structure of a one shot game , 1997, Int. J. Game Theory.

[75]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[76]  Kevin McCabe,et al.  Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games , 1994 .

[77]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation , 1993 .

[78]  M. Bond,et al.  Personality variation and values endorsement in Chinese University students , 1993 .

[79]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Self-confirming equilibrium , 1993 .

[80]  M. Rabin Published by: American , 2022 .

[81]  Religion, Context, and Constraint toward Strangers , 1992 .