Group choice: the ideal free distribution of human social behavior.

Group choice refers to the distribution of group members between two choice alternatives over time. The ideal free distribution (IFD), an optimal foraging model from behavioral ecology, predicts that the ratio of foragers at two resource sites should equal the ratio of obtained resources, a prediction that is formally analogous to the matching law of individual choice, except that group choice is a social phenomenon. Two experiments investigated the usefulness of IFD analyses of human group choice and individual-based explanations that might account for the group-level events. Instead of nonhuman animals foraging at two sites for resources, a group of humans chose blue and red cards to receive points that could earn cash prizes. The groups chose blue and red cards in ratios in positive relation to the ratios of points associated with the cards. When group choice ratios and point ratios were plotted on logarithmic coordinates and fitted with regression lines, the slopes (i.e., sensitivity measures) approached 1.0 but tended to fall short of it (i.e., undermatching), with little bias and little unaccounted for variance. These experiments demonstrate that an IFD analysis of group choice is possible and useful, and suggest that group choice may be explained by the individual members' tendency to optimize reinforcement.

[1]  D. Harper Competitive foraging in mallards: “Ideal free’ ducks , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  F. Tonneau,et al.  The ideal free distribution in humans: An experimental test , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  B. Skinner,et al.  Science and human behavior , 1953 .

[4]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[6]  W. Baum,et al.  Group choice: competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution. , 1998, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  W. Baum,et al.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[11]  G. Heyman,et al.  Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  Bernard Guerin,et al.  Analyzing Social Behavior: Behavior Analysis and the Social Sciences , 1994 .

[13]  R. Gray,et al.  Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution , 1993 .