Spatio-Temporal Gap Analysis of OBIS-SEAMAP Project Data: Assessment and Way Forward

The OBIS-SEAMAP project has acquired and served high-quality marine mammal, seabird, and sea turtle data to the public since its inception in 2002. As data accumulated, spatial and temporal biases resulted and a comprehensive gap analysis was needed in order to assess coverage to direct data acquisition for the OBIS-SEAMAP project and for taxa researchers should true gaps in knowledge exist. All datasets published on OBIS-SEAMAP up to February 2009 were summarized spatially and temporally. Seabirds comprised the greatest number of records, compared to the other two taxa, and most records were from shipboard surveys, compared to the other three platforms. Many of the point observations and polyline tracklines were located in northern and central Atlantic and the northeastern and central-eastern Pacific. The Southern Hemisphere generally had the lowest representation of data, with the least number of records in the southern Atlantic and western Pacific regions. Temporally, records of observations for all taxa were the lowest in fall although the number of animals sighted was lowest in the winter. Oceanographic coverage of observations varied by platform for each taxa, which showed that using two or more platforms represented habitat ranges better than using only one alone. Accessible and published datasets not already incorporated do exist within spatial and temporal gaps identified. Other related open-source data portals also contain data that fill gaps, emphasizing the importance of dedicated data exchange. Temporal and spatial gaps were mostly a result of data acquisition effort, development of regional partnerships and collaborations, and ease of field data collection. Future directions should include fostering partnerships with researchers in the Southern Hemisphere while targeting datasets containing species with limited representation. These results can facilitate prioritizing datasets needed to be represented and for planning research for true gaps in space and time.

[1]  Joanna Burger,et al.  Biology of marine birds , 2001 .

[2]  D. Costa,et al.  A database for the study of marine mammal behavior: gap analysis, data standardization, and future directions , 2006, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[3]  G. Hays,et al.  A review of migratory behaviour of sea turtles off southeastern Africa , 2006 .

[4]  P.,et al.  Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals , 2017 .

[5]  D. Pauly,et al.  Mapping world-wide distributions of marine mammal species using a relative environmental suitability (RES) model , 2006 .

[6]  C. Nunn,et al.  A global gap analysis of infectious agents in wild primates , 2007 .

[7]  V. Bretagnolle,et al.  Delphinid spatial distribution and abundance estimates over the shelf of the Bay of Biscay , 2008 .

[8]  A. Bowman,et al.  Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis : the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations , 1999 .

[9]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The need for evidence-based conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[11]  M. Chitre,et al.  Visual and Passive Acoustic Marine Mammal Observations and High-Frequency Seismic Source Characteristics Recorded During a Seismic Survey , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[12]  D. W. Rice,et al.  Marine mammals of the world, systematics and distributuion , 1998 .

[13]  W. Esaias,et al.  SeaWiFS technical report series. Volume 1: An overview of SeaWiFS and ocean color , 1992 .

[14]  U. Fish.  Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants , 1987 .

[15]  Patrick N. Halpin,et al.  Geospatial web services within a scientific workflow: Predicting marine mammal habitats in a dynamic environment , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[16]  S. Berg.  Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[17]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns? , 2004, Complementary therapies in medicine.

[18]  David Bruce Lewis,et al.  Comparison of ship and aerial surveys of birds at sea , 1985 .

[19]  J. Hartigan,et al.  The Dip Test of Unimodality , 1985 .

[20]  R. Reeves,et al.  Distribution of North Pacific right whales (Eubalaena japonica) as shown by 19th and 20th century whaling catch and sighting records , 2023, J. Cetacean Res. Manage..

[21]  J. Gordon,et al.  Bioacoustics: A tool for the conservation of cetaceans in the Mediterranean Sea , 1997 .

[22]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Global Sea Floor Topography from Satellite Altimetry and Ship Depth Soundings , 1997 .

[23]  Check-List of Birds of the World , 1931, Nature.

[24]  P. M. Hartigan,et al.  Computation of the Dip Statistic to Test for Unimodality , 1985 .

[25]  Susan R. Wilson,et al.  Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews , 1998, BMJ.

[26]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Marine Mammal Survey and Assessment Methods , 1999 .

[27]  Peter R. Oke,et al.  Ocean Data Assimilation Systems for GODAE , 2009 .

[28]  H. Lilliefors.  On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for the Exponential Distribution with Mean Unknown , 1969 .

[29]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  OBIS-SEAMAP: developing a biogeographic research data commons for the ecological studies of marine mammals, seabirds, and sea turtles , 2006 .

[30]  M. L. Reaka-Kudla,et al.  Historical Extinctions in the Sea , 1999 .

[31]  Jesse Cleary,et al.  OBIS-SEAMAP: The World Data Center for Marine Mammal, Sea Bird, and Sea Turtle Distributions , 2009 .

[32]  Cynthia J. Decker,et al.  A Census of marine life: unknowable or just unknown? Un recensement de la vie marine : impossible à connaître ou simplement inconnu ? , 2002 .

[33]  B. Godley,et al.  Satellite Tracking and Analysis Tool (STAT): an integrated system for archiving, analyzing and mapping animal tracking data , 2005 .

[34]  F. Massey.  The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[35]  U. Siebert,et al.  A decade of harbour porpoise occurrence in German waters- : Analyses of aerial surveys, incidental sightings and strandings , 2006 .

[36]  J. Aars,et al.  Estimating the Number of Walruses in Svalbard from Aerial Surveys and Behavioural Data from Satellite Telemetry , 2009 .

[37]  H. Lilliefors.  On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[38]  Gregory M. O'corry-Crowe,et al.  Beluga Whale: Delphinapterus leucas , 2009 .

[39]  S. Reddy,et al.  Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa , 2003 .

[40]  Adrian W. Bowman,et al.  Computational aspects of nonparametric smoothing with illustrations from the sm library , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[41]  Kristen M. Hart,et al.  Satellite telemetry of marine megavertebrates: the coming of age of an experimental science , 2009 .

[42]  J. Bodkin,et al.  An aerial survey method to estimate sea otter abundance , 2021, Marine Mammal Survey and Assessment Methods.

[43]  D. Mcgrath,et al.  CETACEANS IN IRISH WATERS: A REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH , 2022, Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.

[44]  C. D. Duck,et al.  Using satellite telemetry and aerial counts to estimate space use by grey seals around the British Isles , 2004 .

[45]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health , 2001 .

[46]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .