Inter- and intra-firm effects in the diffusion of new process technology

Using primarily the example of Computerised Numerically Controlled Machine Tools (CNC) in the UK metalworking and engineering industry, it is shown that, even many years after the date of first use of a new technology, although the larger proportion of firms may be using that technology, because the extent of intra-firm diffusion is limited, the proportion of total industry output produced on that technology may be quite small. Using backward projection techniques it is further shown that intra-firm diffusion tends to lag behind inter-firm diffusion over the whole of the diffusion process and inter-firm diffusion patterns and extent may thus be poor indicators of overall diffusion. Although intra-firm diffusion is therefore crucial to the understanding of overall diffusion patterns the existing literature relating to it has severe limitations and there are no associated policy results. It is argued that much greater emphasis should be placed on intra-firm issues in future diffusion research. It is also suggested that discussions of intra-firm policy could usefully proceed within the context of already established general diffusion policy principles.

[1]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[2]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  The role of technology use in the survival and growth of manufacturing plants , 1995 .

[3]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  RANK, STOCK, ORDER AND EPIDEMIC EFFECTS IN THE DIFFUSION OF NEW PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES: AN EMPIRICAL MODEL , 1993 .

[4]  E. Mansfield The Diffusion of Flexible Manufacturing Systems in Japan, Europe and the United States , 1993 .

[5]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Intrafirm Rates of Diffusion of an Innovation , 1963 .

[6]  Paul A. David,et al.  Adoption Subsidies vs Information Provision as Instruments of Technology Policy , 1986 .

[7]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[8]  E. Mansfield Industrial research and technological innovation , 1968 .

[9]  P. Howitt,et al.  Endogenous Growth Theory , 1999 .

[10]  P. Stoneman,et al.  The Economics of Technological Diffusion , 2001 .

[11]  Giuliana Battisti,et al.  Intra-firm diffusion of new technologies : the neglected part of technology transfer , 1997 .

[12]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Endogenous innovation in neoclassical growth models: A survey , 1992 .

[13]  G. Battisti,et al.  The intra-firm diffusion of new process technologies , 2005 .

[14]  R. Barro,et al.  Inflation and Economic Growth , 1995 .

[15]  Z. Griliches HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[16]  S. Davies The Diffusion of Process Innovations , 1979 .

[17]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  Firm size and the adoption of flexible automation , 1990 .

[18]  S. Davies Inter-firm diffusion of process innovations , 1979 .

[19]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change , 1995 .

[20]  G. Battisti The intra-firm diffusion of new technologies , 2000 .

[21]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Uncertainty and technological change , 1996 .

[22]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  The Speed of Response of Firms to New Techniques , 1963 .

[23]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. , 1991 .

[24]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Intra-Firm Diffusion, Bayesian Learning and Profitability , 1981 .