The Syllabic Structure of Spoken Words: Evidence from the Syllabification of Intervocalic Consonants

A series of experiments was carried out to investigate the syllable affiliation of intervocalic consonants following short vowels, long vowels, and schwa in Dutch. Special interest was paid to words such as letter [l∊[UNKNOWN]t] “id.,” where a short vowel is followed by a single consonant. On phonological grounds one may predict that the first syllable should always be closed, but earlier psycholinguistic research had shown that speakers tend to leave these syllables open. In our experiments, bisyllabic word forms were presented aurally, and participants produced their syllables in reversed order (Experiments 1 through 5), or repeated the words inserting a pause between the syllables (Experiment 6). The results showed that participants generally closed syllables with a short vowel. However, in a significant number of the cases they produced open short vowel syllables. Syllables containing schwa, like syllables with a long vowel, were hardly ever closed. Word stress, the phonetic quality of the vowel in the first syllable, and the experimental context influenced syllabification. Taken together, the experiments show that native speakers syllabify bisyllabic Dutch nouns in accordance with a small set of prosodic output constraints. To account for the variability of the results, we propose that these constraints differ in their probabilities of being applied.

[1]  R. Treiman,et al.  Toward an understanding of English syllabification , 1990 .

[2]  Steven Gillis,et al.  Intuitive syllabification: universals and language specific constraints , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[3]  R. Treiman,et al.  In Defense of an Onset-Rime Syllable Structure for English , 1995, Language and speech.

[4]  James E. Hoard Aspiration, Tenseness, and Syllabication in English. , 1971 .

[5]  R. Treiman,et al.  Syllabification of intervocalic consonants , 1988 .

[6]  Peter F. MacNeilage,et al.  The Production of Speech , 2011, Springer New York.

[7]  Heinz J. Giegerich,et al.  English Phonology: An Introduction , 1992 .

[8]  Theo Vennemann ZUR SILBENSTRUKTUR DER DEUTSCHEN STANDARDSPRACHE , 1982 .

[9]  Michael Ziolkowski,et al.  Papers from the 26th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 1992 .

[10]  W. Zonneveld,et al.  Schwa, superheavies, stress and syllables in Dutch , 1993 .

[11]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  English Plosive Allophones and Ambisyllabicity in Niet-lineaire fonologie, een theorie in SPE . , 1986 .

[12]  A. Crompton,et al.  Syllables and segments in speech production , 1981 .

[13]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Spectral analysis and identification of Dutch vowels in monosyllabic words , 1977 .

[14]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Serial Order in Planning the Production of Successive Morphemes of a Word , 1996 .

[15]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[16]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[17]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  The Structure of phonological representations , 1982 .

[18]  Koopmans-Van Beinum,et al.  Vowel contrast reduction : an acoustic and perceptual study of Dutch vowels in various speech conditions , 1980 .

[19]  R. Treiman The division between onsets and rimes in English syllables , 1986 .

[20]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  A fluent backward talker. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  M. Adams What good is orthographic redundancy , 1980 .

[22]  Richard Wiese Silbische und lexikalische Phonologie : Studien zum Chinesischen und Deutschen , 1988 .

[23]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[24]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[25]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures , 1998 .

[26]  Junko Ito,et al.  A prosodic theory of epenthesis , 1989 .

[27]  Theo Vennemann The German Velar Nasal , 1970 .

[28]  Bruce L. Derwing,et al.  A ‘Pause-Break’ Task For Eliciting Syllable Boundary Judgments from Literate and Illiterate Speakers: Preliminary Results for Five Diverse Languages , 1992 .

[29]  Roger Lass English Phonology and Phonological Theory: Synchronic and Diachronic Studies , 1976 .

[30]  Thomas F. Shannon,et al.  The Syllable in Dutch, with Special Reference to Diminutive Formation , 1988 .

[31]  D. Fallows Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure , 1981, Journal of Linguistics.

[32]  D. V. Bergem Acoustic and Lexical Vowel Reduction , 1995 .

[33]  C. Gussenhoven English Plosive Allophones and Ambisyllabicity , 1986 .

[34]  E. Pulgram Syllable, word, nexus, cursus , 1970 .

[35]  R Treiman,et al.  Children's sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes, and phonemes. , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[36]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? , 1987 .

[37]  Phil Hoole,et al.  Kinematic analysis of vowel production in German , 1994, ICSLP.

[38]  D. Norris Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[39]  Alan Prince,et al.  Prosodic morphology : constraint interaction and satisfaction , 1993 .

[40]  Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder,et al.  The syllable's role in speech segmentation , 1981 .

[41]  Voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch fricatives , 1989 .

[42]  R. Treiman,et al.  The Structure of English Syllables and Polysyllables , 1993 .

[43]  Natalie Lefkowitz,et al.  Talking backwards, looking forwards: The French language game verlan , 1991 .

[44]  Karl Heinz Ramers,et al.  Vokalquantität und -qualität im Deutschen , 1988 .

[45]  G. Booij The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[46]  A. Lahiri,et al.  The role of syllables in the perception of spoken dutch , 1993 .

[47]  R. Kager,et al.  SCHWA, SYLLABLES, AND EXTRAMETRICALITY IN DUTCH , 1986 .

[48]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Sublexical Units and Suprasegmental Structure in Speech Production Planning , 1983 .

[49]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. , 1979 .

[50]  R. Kager A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch , 1989 .

[51]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: “Targetless” schwa: an articulatory analysis , 1992 .

[52]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word Games and Syllable Structure , 1995 .

[53]  Theo Vennemann Neuere Entwicklungen in der Phonologie , 1986 .

[54]  Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words , 1994 .

[55]  Universelle Nuklearphonologie mit epiphänomenaler Silbenstruktur , 1994 .

[56]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  The Phonological and Metaphonological Representation of Speech: Evidence from Fluent Backward Talkers , 1985 .

[57]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Syllable Structure or Word Structure? Evidence for Onset and Rime Units with Disyllabic and Trisyllabic Stimuli , 1995 .

[58]  M. Halle,et al.  Segmental phonology of Modern English , 1985 .

[59]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games , 1983, Cognition.

[60]  L. Nakatani,et al.  Locus of segmental cues for word juncture. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  I. Lehiste The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries , 1972 .

[62]  José E. García-Albea,et al.  The status of the syllable in the perception of spanish and englisb , 1993 .

[63]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  Syllable Structure and Stress in Dutch , 1985 .

[64]  René Kager,et al.  Dutch schwa in moraic phonology , 1990 .

[65]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words , 1998 .

[66]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  A Comparison of Lexeme and Speech Syllables in Dutch , 1996, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[67]  Ronald A. Cole,et al.  Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. , 1985 .