Molecular Basis for the Dynamic Strength of the Integrin α4β1/VCAM-1 Interaction

Intercellular adhesion mediated by integrin α4β1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) plays a crucial role in both the rolling and firm attachment of leukocytes onto the vascular endothelium. Essential to the α4β1/VCAM-1 interaction is its mechanical strength that allows the complex to resist the large shear forces imposed by the bloodstream. Herein we employed single-molecule dynamic force spectroscopy to investigate the dynamic strength of the α4β1/VCAM-1 complex. Our force measurements revealed that the dissociation of the α4β1/VCAM-1 complex involves overcoming at least two activation potential barriers: a steep inner barrier and a more elevated outer barrier. The inner barrier grants the complex the tensile strength to withstand large pulling forces (>50 pN) and was attributed to the ionic interaction between the chelated Mg2+ ion at the N-terminal A-domain of the β1 subunit of α4β1 and the carboxyl group of Asp-40 of VCAM-1 through the use of site-directed mutations. In general, additional mutations within the C-D loop of domain 1 of VCAM-1 suppressed both inner and outer barriers of the α4β1/VCAM-1 complex, while a mutation at Asp-143 of domain 2 of VCAM-1 resulted in the suppression of the outer barrier, but not the inner barrier. In contrast, the outer barrier of α4β1/VCAM-1 complex was stabilized by integrin activation. Together, these findings provide a molecular explanation for the functionally relevant kinetic properties of the α4β1/VCAM-1 interaction.

[1]  T. Springer,et al.  Selectin receptor-ligand bonds: Formation limited by shear rate and dissociation governed by the Bell model. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Molecular properties in cell adhesion: a physical and engineering perspective. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  A. Whitty,et al.  Multiple activation states of integrin alpha4beta1 detected through their different affinities for a small molecule ligand. , 1999, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  P. Kubes.  The complexities of leukocyte recruitment. , 2002, Seminars in immunology.

[5]  M. Radmacher,et al.  From molecules to cells: imaging soft samples with the atomic force microscope. , 1992, Science.

[6]  T. Springer,et al.  Leukocytes roll on a selectin at physiologic flow rates: Distinction from and prerequisite for adhesion through integrins , 1991, Cell.

[7]  A. Whitty,et al.  Multiple Activation States of Integrin α4β1 Detected through Their Different Affinities for a Small Molecule Ligand* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  R. Merkel,et al.  Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy , 1999, Nature.

[9]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Adhesion receptors of the immune system , 1990, Nature.

[10]  Y. Jiao,et al.  Adhesion energy of receptor-mediated interaction measured by elastic deformation. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[11]  V. Moy,et al.  Single-molecule force measurements. , 2002, Methods in cell biology.

[12]  Evan Evans,et al.  Chemically distinct transition states govern rapid dissociation of single L-selectin bonds under force , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  David A. Kidwell,et al.  Sensing Discrete Streptavidin-Biotin Interactions with Atomic Force Microscopy , 1994 .

[14]  P. Kubes.  Introduction: The complexities of leukocyte recruitment , 2002 .

[15]  R. Waugh,et al.  A microcantilever device to assess the effect of force on the lifetime of selectin-carbohydrate bonds. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[16]  M. Hemler,et al.  The VLA protein family. Characterization of five distinct cell surface heterodimers each with a common 130,000 molecular weight beta subunit. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  J. Hörber,et al.  Scanning Probe Evolution in Biology , 2003, Science.

[18]  Terry D. Foutz,et al.  Alpha4beta1 integrin affinity changes govern cell adhesion. , 2003, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  T. Springer,et al.  The integrin VLA-4 supports tethering and rolling in flow on VCAM-1 , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  E. Evans,et al.  Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[21]  T. Kirchhausen,et al.  Arrangement of Domains , and Amino Acid Residues Required for Binding of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 to Its Counter-Receptor VLA-4 ( a 4 fll ) , 2002 .

[22]  V. Moy,et al.  Force spectroscopy of the leukocyte function-associated antigen-1/intercellular adhesion molecule-1 interaction. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Expression of a soluble functional form of the integrin alpha4beta1 in mammalian cells. , 2000, Cell adhesion and communication.

[24]  P. McEwan,et al.  Integrin structure: heady advances in ligand binding, but activation still makes the knees wobble. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[25]  T. Kirchhausen,et al.  Arrangement of domains, and amino acid residues required for binding of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 to its counter-receptor VLA-4 (alpha 4 beta 1) , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  The dynamic regulation of integrin adhesiveness , 1994, Current Biology.

[27]  Jia-huai Wang,et al.  Structural specializations of immunoglobulin superfamily members for adhesion to integrins and viruses , 1998, Immunological reviews.

[28]  H. Gaub,et al.  Intermolecular forces and energies between ligands and receptors. , 1994, Science.

[29]  Michael L. Dustin,et al.  T-cell receptor cross-linking transiently stimulates adhesiveness through LFA-1 , 1989, Nature.

[30]  Harold P. Erickson,et al.  Force Measurements of the α5β1 Integrin–Fibronectin Interaction , 2003 .

[31]  M. Benoit.  Cell adhesion measured by force spectroscopy on living cells. , 2002, Methods in cell biology.

[32]  T. Springer.  Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: The multistep paradigm , 1994, Cell.

[33]  E L Berg,et al.  A direct comparison of selectin-mediated transient, adhesive events using high temporal resolution. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[34]  H. Gaub,et al.  Adhesion forces between individual ligand-receptor pairs. , 1994, Science.

[35]  T. Kunkel.  Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[37]  M. Humphries,et al.  Alpha4 integrin binding interfaces on VCAM-1 and MAdCAM-1. Integrin binding footprints identify accessory binding sites that play a role in integrin specificity. , 1997, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[38]  S. Ortlepp,et al.  Expression of a Soluble Functional Form of the Integrin α4β1 in Mammalian Cells , 2000 .

[39]  Terry D. Foutz,et al.  α4β1 Integrin Affinity Changes Govern Cell Adhesion* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  G. I. Bell.  Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[41]  Vincent T. Moy,et al.  Contributions of molecular binding events and cellular compliance to the modulation of leukocyte adhesion , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[42]  D. Staunton,et al.  Residues within a conserved amino acid motif of domains 1 and 4 of VCAM- 1 are required for binding to VLA-4 , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  C. Carman,et al.  Integrin avidity regulation: are changes in affinity and conformation underemphasized? , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[44]  Gerber,et al.  Atomic Force Microscope , 2020, Definitions.

[45]  M. Shimaoka,et al.  Conformational regulation of integrin structure and function. , 2002, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[46]  S. Redick,et al.  Force Measurements of the a 5 b 1 Integrin-Fibronectin Interaction , 2003 .