From recognition to decisions: Extending and testing recognition-based models for multialternative inference

The recognition heuristic is a noncompensatory strategy for inferring which of two alternatives, one recognized and the other not, scores higher on a criterion. According to it, such inferences are based solely on recognition. We generalize this heuristic to tasks with multiple alternatives, proposing a model of how people identify the consideration sets from which they make their final decisions. In doing so, we address concerns about the heuristic’s adequacy as a model of behavior: Past experiments have led several authors to conclude that there is no evidence for a noncompensatory use of recognition but clear evidence that recognition is integrated with other information. Surprisingly, however, in no study was this competing hypothesis—the compensatory integration of recognition—formally specified as a computational model. In four studies, we specify five competing models, conducting eight model comparisons. In these model comparisons, the recognition heuristic emerges as the best predictor of people’s inferences.

[1]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[2]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  L. Schooler,et al.  Cognitive aging and the adaptive use of recognition in decision making. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[4]  C. Lebiere,et al.  An integrated theory of list memory. , 1998 .

[5]  W. Gaissmaier,et al.  Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[7]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  B. Galef,et al.  Social influences on the identification of toxic foods by Norway rats , 1987 .

[9]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[10]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  Forecasting from ignorance: the use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sports events. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Ecologically rational strategy selection , 2009 .

[12]  J. Ford,et al.  Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions , 1989 .

[13]  R. Shepard.  Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[14]  Stefan M. Herzog,et al.  The wisdom of ignorant crowds: Predicting sport outcomes by mere recognition , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[15]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[16]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY , 1974 .

[17]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[18]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  Cognitive Aging and the Adaptive Selection of Decision Strategies: (527342012-081) , 2007 .

[19]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Unit weighting schemes for decision making , 1975 .

[20]  John Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention, and learning. , 2007, Psychological review.

[21]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart , 1999 .

[22]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[23]  P. Todd,et al.  Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World , 2012 .

[24]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  Do Voters Use Episodic Knowledge to Rely on Recognition , 2009 .

[25]  Timothy J. Pleskac,et al.  A signal detection analysis of the recognition heuristic , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Edward T. Cokely,et al.  Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[27]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[28]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Cognitive niches: an ecological model of strategy selection. , 2011, Psychological review.

[29]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Implicit memory: a prime example for brand consideration and choice , 2004 .

[30]  David R Shanks,et al.  On the role of recognition in decision making. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  Stefan M. Herzog,et al.  Fluency heuristic: a model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  D. L. Hintzman.  Why are Formal Models Useful in Psychology , 1990 .

[34]  Larry M. Bartels.  Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996 , 2000 .

[35]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. , 1994 .

[36]  Benjamin E Hilbig,et al.  Recognizing users of the recognition heuristic. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[37]  L. Standing.  Learning 10,000 pictures. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  J. Orlin,et al.  Greedoid-Based Noncompensatory Inference , 2007 .

[39]  J. Rieskamp,et al.  SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[41]  R. Kohli,et al.  Representation and Inference of Lexicographic Preference Models and Their Variants , 2007 .

[42]  Benjamin E. Hilbig,et al.  Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  R. Dawes.  Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[44]  S. Lewandowsky.  The Rewards and Hazards of Computer Simulations , 1993 .

[45]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[46]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[47]  R. Hogarth.  Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision , 1982 .

[48]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Beyond the null ritual : Formal modeling of psychological processes , 2009 .

[49]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of association for cross classifications , 1979 .

[50]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. , 2002, Psychological review.

[51]  G. Haines,et al.  The Theory of Buyer Behavior. , 1970 .

[52]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Effects of Context and Part-Category Cues on Recall of Competing Brands , 1985 .

[53]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[54]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  R. Hertwig,et al.  How forgetting aids heuristic inference. , 2005, Psychological review.

[56]  C. Gettys,et al.  MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. , 1999 .

[57]  John Roberts,et al.  Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition , 1991 .

[58]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Good Judgments Do Not Require Complex Cognition , 2008 .

[59]  Rick P. Thomas,et al.  Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics. , 2008, Psychological review.

[60]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  L. Brooks,et al.  Nonanalytic Cognition: Memory, Perception, and Concept Learning , 1984 .

[62]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Fast and Frugal Heuristics Are Plausible Models of Cognition: Reply To , 2022 .

[63]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[64]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[65]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  Recognition-based inference: When is less more in the real world? , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  P. Todd,et al.  More Is Not Always Better: The Benefits of Cognitive Limits , 2003 .

[67]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments. , 2007, Psychological review.

[68]  Andrea Stocco,et al.  The cognitive modeling of human behavior: Why a model is (sometimes) better than 10,000 words , 2007, Cognitive Systems Research.

[69]  J. James.  A little learning is a dangerous thing... , 2001 .

[70]  Philip T. Smith,et al.  The Relative Success of Recognition-Based Inference in Multichoice Decisions , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[71]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  Five Principles for Studying People's Use of Heuristics , 2010 .

[72]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. , 2002, Psychological review.

[73]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  On the binary quality of recognition and the inconsequentiality of further knowledge: two critical tests of the recognition heuristic , 2006 .

[75]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. , 2002 .

[76]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  The use of recognition information and additional cues in inferences from memory. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[77]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  The recognition heuristic in memory‐based inference: is recognition a non‐compensatory cue? , 2008 .

[78]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with Many Alternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-offs with Binary Attributes , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[79]  H. J. Einhorn.  The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  D. Berry,et al.  Implicit Memory and Consumer Choice: The Mediating Role of Brand Familiarity , 2006 .

[81]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[82]  L. Schooler,et al.  The aging decision maker: cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[83]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Criterion knowledge: A moderator of using the recognition heuristic? , 2009 .

[84]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  Why You Think Milan is Larger than Modena: Neural Correlates of the Recognition Heuristic , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[85]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[86]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Not so fast! (and not so frugal!): rethinking the recognition heuristic , 2003, Cognition.

[87]  Christian Frings,et al.  Who will win Wimbledon? The recognition heuristic in predicting sports events , 2006 .

[88]  B. W. Whittlesea.  Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[89]  Rüdiger F. Pohl,et al.  Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic , 2006 .

[90]  B. Hilbig.  Individual differences in fast-and-frugal decision making : neuroticism and the recognition heuristic , 2008 .