Analysis of the Local Quasi-Stationarity of Measured Dual-Polarized MIMO Channels

It is common practice in wireless communications to assume strict or wide-sense stationarity of the wireless channel in time and frequency. While this approximation has some physical justification, it is only valid inside certain time–frequency regions. This paper presents an elaborate characterization of the non-stationarity of wireless dual-polarized (DP) channels in time. The evaluation is based on urban macrocell measurements performed at 2.53 GHz. To define local quasi-stationarity (LQS) regions, i.e., regions in which the change of certain channel statistics is deemed insignificant, we resort to the performance degradation of selected algorithms specific to channel estimation and beamforming. Additionally, we compare our results to commonly used measures in the literature. We find that the polarization, the antenna spacing, and the opening angle of the antennas into the propagation channel can strongly influence the non-stationarity of the observed channel. The obtained LQS regions can be of significant size, i.e., several meters; thus, the reuse of channel statistics over large distances is meaningful (in an average sense) for the considered correlation-based algorithms. Furthermore, we conclude that, from a system perspective, a proper non-stationarity analysis should be based on the considered algorithm.

[1]  M. V. Clark,et al.  A new path-gain/delay-spread propagation model for digital cellular channels , 1997 .

[2]  Claude Oestges,et al.  Dual-polarized wireless communications: from propagation models to system performance evaluation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  Michael A. Jensen,et al.  Experimental Characterization of the Outdoor MIMO Wireless Channel Temporal Variation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  Non-WSSUS vehicular channel characterization in highway and urban scenarios at 5.2GHz using the local scattering function , 2008, 2008 International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas.

[5]  Guido Tartara,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Measured Impulse Response Functions of 2.0 GHz Indoor Radio Channels , 1996, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[6]  Gerd Ascheid,et al.  On Non-Stationary Urban Macrocell Channels in a Cooperative Downlink Beamforming Scenario , 2010, 2010 IEEE 72nd Vehicular Technology Conference - Fall.

[7]  Mikael Coldrey,et al.  Modeling and Capacity of Polarized MIMO Channels , 2008, VTC Spring 2008 - IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[8]  K. Riedel,et al.  Quadratic time-varying spectral estimation for underspread processes , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time- Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis.

[9]  Claude Oestges,et al.  Non-Stationary Narrowband MIMO Inter-Vehicle Channel Characterization in the 5-GHz Band , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Gerd Ascheid,et al.  Analysis of Local Quasi-Stationarity Regions in an Urban Macrocell Scenario , 2010, 2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[11]  Gerd Ascheid,et al.  Characterization of Non-Stationary Channels Using Mismatched Wiener Filtering , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  G. Matz,et al.  On non-WSSUS wireless fading channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  H. Ozcelik,et al.  Correlation matrix distance, a meaningful measure for evaluation of non-stationary MIMO channels , 2005, 2005 IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[14]  Wolfgang Utschick,et al.  Validity of spatial covariance matrices over time and frequency , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.

[15]  Omar Aldayel Evaluation of MIMO Stationarity , 2011 .

[16]  Ernst Bonek,et al.  A MIMO Correlation Matrix based Metric for Characterizing Non-Stationarity , 2005 .

[17]  Partha P. Mitra,et al.  Tripling the capacity of wireless communications using electromagnetic polarization , 2001, Nature.

[18]  P. Bello Characterization of Randomly Time-Variant Linear Channels , 1963 .

[19]  David Tse,et al.  Degree-of-Freedom Gain From Using Polarimetric Antenna Elements , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[20]  Xiongwen Zhao,et al.  IST-4-027756 WINNER II D1.1.2 V1.1 WINNER II Channel Models , 2007 .

[21]  Gerd Sommerkorn,et al.  MIMO vector channel sounder measurement for smart antenna system evaluation , 2001, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[22]  Reiner S. Thomä,et al.  Polarization Behavior of Discrete Multipath and Diffuse Scattering in Urban Environments at 4.5 GHz , 2007, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[23]  D. Slepian Prolate spheroidal wave functions, fourier analysis, and uncertainty — V: the discrete case , 1978, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[24]  Gerald Matz Doubly underspread non-WSSUS channels: analysis and estimation of channel statistics , 2003, 2003 4th IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications - SPAWC 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03EX689).

[25]  T. Zemen,et al.  Non-WSSUS Vehicular Channel Characterization at 5.2 GHz - Spectral Divergence and Time-Variant Coherence Parameters , 2008 .