Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level?

Nonwords created by transposing two letters (e.g., RELOVUTION) are very effective at activating the lexical representation of their base words (Perea & Lupker, 2004). In the present study, we examined whether the nature of transposed-letter (TL) similarity effects was purely orthographic or whether it could also have a phonological component. Specifically, we examined transposed-letter similarity effects for nonwords created by transposing two nonadjacent letters (e.g., relovución–REVOLUCIÓN) in a masked form priming experiment using the lexical decision task (Experiment 1). The controls were (a) a pseudohomophone of the transposed-letter prime (relobución–REVOLUCIÓN; note that B and V are pronounced as /b/ in Spanish) or (b) an orthographic control (relodución–REVOLUCIÓN). Results showed a similar advantage of the TL nonword condition over the phonological and the orthographic control conditions. Experiment 2 showed a masked phonological priming effect when the letter positions in the prime were in the right order. In a third experiment, using a single-presentation lexical decision task, TL nonwords produced longer latencies than the orthographic and phonological controls, whereas there was only a small phonological effect restricted to the error data. These results suggest that TL similarity effects are orthographic—rather than phonological—in nature.

[1]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  A Note on the Informativeness of Parts of Words , 1958 .

[2]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[3]  S. M. Chambers Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .

[4]  K. Forster,et al.  Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[5]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[6]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[7]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J Grainger,et al.  Effects of Orthography are Independent of Phonology in Masked form Priming , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  F. Cuetos,et al.  Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano , 1995 .

[10]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English , 1995 .

[11]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[12]  K I Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  S. Andrews Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .

[14]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[15]  R Frost,et al.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  R. Frost Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .

[17]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Separable processing of consonants and vowels , 2000, Nature.

[18]  M Perea,et al.  Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[20]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  J C Ziegler,et al.  Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading , 2001 .

[23]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[24]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. , 2002 .

[26]  J. Bowers Masked priming: State of the Art , 2003 .

[27]  Marcela Peña,et al.  ON THE DIFFERENT ROLES OF VOWELS AND CONSONANTS IN SPEECH PROCESSING AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2003 .

[28]  M. Ahissar,et al.  Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming , 2003 .

[29]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[30]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[31]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[32]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? , 2004 .

[33]  P. Sánchez,et al.  Influencia del orden de adquisición del léxico en el reconocimiento de palabras / Miguel Angel Pérez Sánchez ; directores, Conrado Navalón Vila y Javier Marín Serrano. , 2004 .

[34]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[35]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency , 2004, Brain and Language.

[37]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[39]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  J. Grainger,et al.  Sequential Effects of Phonological Priming in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, Psychological science.