Abstract myoelectric control with EMG drive estimated using linear, kurtosis and Bayesian filtering

Three muscle activation estimators: a linear mean-absolute value filter, a recursive Bayesian method, and a kurtosis filter were compared as control approaches for an abstract myoelectric-controlled interface. The linear filter outperformed both the Bayesian and kurtosis methods with respect to participants' overall scores. Despite significantly less efficient trajectories, the Bayesian filter showed a reduction in the time required to reach individual targets. Results demonstrate both that linear methods can outperform more complex filtering techniques, and that real-time kurtosis may be used as an activation estimator.

[1]  N. R. Wilson A Note on the Probability Function , 1935 .

[2]  I. W. Hunter,et al.  Estimation of the conduction velocity of muscle action potentials using phase and impulse response function techniques , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[3]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Abstract and Proportional Myoelectric Control for Multi-Fingered Hand Prostheses , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Chusak Limsakul,et al.  Analysis of Electromyography in Dynamic Hand Motions Using L-Kurtosis , 2015 .

[5]  Philippe Pierre Pebay,et al.  Formulas for robust, one-pass parallel computation of covariances and arbitrary-order statistical moments. , 2008 .

[6]  N. Hogan,et al.  Probability density of the surface electromyogram and its relation to amplitude detectors , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Tutorial on higher-order statistics (spectra) in signal processing and system theory: theoretical results and some applications , 1991, Proc. IEEE.

[8]  K. Nazarpour,et al.  Negentropy analysis of surface electromyogram signal , 2005, IEEE/SP 13th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, 2005.

[9]  S. Arjunan,et al.  Kurtosis and negentropy investigation of myo electric signals during different MVCs , 2011, ISSNIP Biosignals and Biorobotics Conference 2011.

[10]  P.A. Parker,et al.  Signal processing for the multistate myoelectric channel , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  Probability density of electromyography signal for different levels of contraction of biceps brachii , 2013, 2013 10th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology.

[12]  Ahmad R. Sharafat,et al.  Application of Higher Order Statistics to Surface Electromyogram Signal Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Euljoon Park,et al.  Adaptive filtering of the electromyographic signal for prosthetic control and force estimation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  G. Hefftner,et al.  The electromyogram (EMG) as a control signal for functional neuromuscular stimulation. II. Practical demonstration of the EMG signature discrimination system , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  Probability Density Functions of Stationary Surface EMG Signals in Noisy Environments , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Kianoush Nazarpour,et al.  Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Terence D Sanger,et al.  Bayesian filtering of myoelectric signals. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Kianoush Nazarpour,et al.  Comparison of hand and forearm muscle pairs in controlling of a novel myoelectric interface , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[19]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Dario Farina,et al.  Bayesian Filtering of Surface EMG for Accurate Simultaneous and Proportional Prosthetic Control , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  P. Dario,et al.  Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. , 2002, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[22]  S Micera,et al.  Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  A note on the probability distribution function of the surface electromyogram signal☆ , 2013, Brain Research Bulletin.

[24]  A. Jackson,et al.  Flexible Cortical Control of Task-Specific Muscle Synergies , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[26]  P. Herberts The Control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses , 1974 .

[27]  D. Gravel,et al.  Normality and stationarity of EMG signals of elbow flexor muscles during ramp and step isometric contractions. , 1997, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.