Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.

The present paper addresses the question of the form of the mathematical relation between the time until a delayed reward and its present value. Data are presented from an experiment in which subjects chose between hypothetical amounts of money available either immediately or after a delay (Green, Fry, & Myerson, 1994). Analyses of the behavior of individual young adults demonstrated that temporal discounting is better described by hyperbola-like functions than by exponential decay functions. For most individuals, the parameter that determines the rate of discounting varied inversely with amount. Raising the denominator of the discounting function to a power resulted in better descriptions of the data from most subjects. Two possible derivations of the temporal discounting function are proposed, a repeated choice model and an expected value model. These provide theoretical interpretations for amount-dependent discounting but amount-independent exponent parameters.

[1]  P. Samuelson A Note on Measurement of Utility , 1937 .

[2]  M. Sidman A note on functional relations obtained from group data. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Estes Wk The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956 .

[4]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[5]  H Rachlin,et al.  On the tautology of the matching law. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  G. Ainslie Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  L. Green,et al.  Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .

[10]  R. Thaler Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency , 1981 .

[11]  Douglas J. Navarick,et al.  Negative reinforcement and choice in humans , 1982 .

[12]  A W Logue,et al.  Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Cognition and behavior in studies of choice , 1986 .

[14]  A. Logue,et al.  Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  U. Ben-Zion,et al.  Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study , 1989 .

[16]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  D. Cross,et al.  Subjective probability and delay. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[19]  H. Rachlin,et al.  The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities , 1993 .

[20]  Joel Myerson,et al.  ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SELF CONTROL , 1993 .

[21]  L. Green,et al.  Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison , 1994 .

[23]  J. Kagel,et al.  Economic Choice Theory: An Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior , 1995 .