Uncoupled Embryonic and Extra-Embryonic Tissues Compromise Blastocyst Development after Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is the most efficient cell reprogramming technique available, especially when working with bovine species. Although SCNT blastocysts performed equally well or better than controls in the weeks following embryo transfer at Day 7, elongation and gastrulation defects were observed prior to implantation. To understand the developmental implications of embryonic/extra-embryonic interactions, the morphological and molecular features of elongating and gastrulating tissues were analysed. At Day 18, 30 SCNT conceptuses were compared to 20 controls (AI and IVP: 10 conceptuses each); one-half of the SCNT conceptuses appeared normal while the other half showed signs of atypical elongation and gastrulation. SCNT was also associated with a high incidence of discordance in embryonic and extra-embryonic patterns, as evidenced by morphological and molecular “uncoupling”. Elongation appeared to be secondarily affected; only 3 of 30 conceptuses had abnormally elongated shapes and there were very few differences in gene expression when they were compared to the controls. However, some of these differences could be linked to defects in microvilli formation or extracellular matrix composition and could thus impact extra-embryonic functions. In contrast to elongation, gastrulation stages included embryonic defects that likely affected the hypoblast, the epiblast, or the early stages of their differentiation. When taking into account SCNT conceptus somatic origin, i.e. the reprogramming efficiency of each bovine ear fibroblast (Low: 0029, Med: 7711, High: 5538), we found that embryonic abnormalities or severe embryonic/extra-embryonic uncoupling were more tightly correlated to embryo loss at implantation than were elongation defects. Alternatively, extra-embryonic differences between SCNT and control conceptuses at Day 18 were related to molecular plasticity (high efficiency/high plasticity) and subsequent pregnancy loss. Finally, because it alters re-differentiation processes in vivo, SCNT reprogramming highlights temporally and spatially restricted interactions among cells and tissues in a unique way.

[1]  M. Guillomot Cellular interactions during implantation in domestic ruminants. , 2019, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[2]  M. Muñoz,et al.  Efficient derivation of bovine embryonic stem cells needs more than active core pluripotency factors , 2012, Molecular reproduction and development.

[3]  N. Peynot,et al.  Expression of Pluripotency Master Regulators during Two Key Developmental Transitions: EGA and Early Lineage Specification in the Bovine Embryo , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  S. Camous,et al.  Review: Placental perturbations induce the developmental abnormalities often observed in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. , 2012, Placenta.

[5]  K. Abe,et al.  RNAi-mediated knockdown of Xist can rescue the impaired postimplantation development of cloned mouse embryos , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  S. Degrelle,et al.  Expression and localization of DLX3, PPARG and SP1 in bovine trophoblast during binucleated cell differentiation. , 2011, Placenta.

[7]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Mechanisms of nuclear reprogramming by eggs and oocytes: a deterministic process? , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  R. E. Everts,et al.  Transferase activity function and system development process are critical in cattle embryo development , 2011, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[9]  Liu Wang,et al.  Pluripotency maintenance in mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos and its improvement by treatment with the histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA. , 2011, Cellular reprogramming.

[10]  F. Perecin,et al.  Loss of Methylation at H19 DMD Is Associated with Biallelic Expression and Reduced Development in Cattle Derived by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer1 , 2011, Biology of reproduction.

[11]  M. van Dijk,et al.  STOX1: Key Player in Trophoblast Dysfunction Underlying Early Onset Preeclampsia with Growth Retardation , 2010, Journal of pregnancy.

[12]  Fang Yu,et al.  Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) is required for maintenance of breast cancer stem cells and for cell migration and invasion , 2010, Oncogene.

[13]  R. Prather,et al.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: How can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming? , 2010, Molecular reproduction and development.

[14]  P. Pfeffer,et al.  Nuclear transfer-specific defects are not apparent during the second week of embryogenesis in cattle. , 2010, Cellular reprogramming.

[15]  Krishanu Saha,et al.  Pluripotency and Cellular Reprogramming: Facts, Hypotheses, Unresolved Issues , 2010, Cell.

[16]  K. Sawai,et al.  Aberrant expression patterns of genes involved in segregation of inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages in bovine embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. , 2010, Cellular reprogramming.

[17]  R. Einspanier,et al.  Differential gene expression in bovine elongated (Day 17) embryos produced by somatic cell nucleus transfer and in vitro fertilization. , 2010, Theriogenology.

[18]  Liu Wang,et al.  Somatic Nucleus Reprogramming Is Significantly Improved by m-Carboxycinnamic Acid Bishydroxamide, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  R. Prather,et al.  Effect of epigenetic regulation during swine embryogenesis and on cloning by nuclear transfer , 2010, Cell and Tissue Research.

[20]  R. Einspanier,et al.  Changes in the expression of pluripotency-associated genes during preimplantation and peri-implantation stages in bovine cloned and in vitro produced embryos , 2010, Zygote.

[21]  L. Jouneau,et al.  Nuclear Transfer‐Derived Epiblast Stem Cells Are Transcriptionally and Epigenetically Distinguishable from Their Fertilized‐Derived Counterparts , 2010, Stem cells.

[22]  R. Alberio,et al.  Pig epiblast stem cells depend on activin/nodal signaling for pluripotency and self-renewal. , 2010, Stem cells and development.

[23]  M. Hosoe,et al.  Cloning and expression of SOLD1 in ovine and caprine placenta, and their expected roles during the development of placentomes , 2010, BMC Developmental Biology.

[24]  P. Pfeffer,et al.  Embryo loss in cattle between Days 7 and 16 of pregnancy. , 2010, Theriogenology.

[25]  H. Kee,et al.  Krüppel-like factor 4 mediates histone deacetylase inhibitor-induced prevention of cardiac hypertrophy. , 2009, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[26]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Recruitment of Polycomb group complexes and their role in the dynamic regulation of cell fate choice , 2009, Development.

[27]  M. Soares,et al.  Trophoblast stem cells derived from nuclear transfer embryos: Phenotypically unique, bad neighbors, or poor communicators? , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  J. Yanagisawa,et al.  KLF4 suppresses estrogen-dependent breast cancer growth by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of ERα , 2009, Oncogene.

[29]  A. Evsikov,et al.  Retrotransposon expression as a defining event of genome reprogramming in fertilized and cloned bovine embryos. , 2009, Reproduction.

[30]  M. Hosoe,et al.  Characterization and Expression Analysis of SOLD1, a Novel Member of the Retrotransposon-Derived Ly-6 Superfamily, in Bovine Placental Villi , 2009, PloS one.

[31]  A. Ogura,et al.  Embryonic rather than extraembryonic tissues have more impact on the development of placental hyperplasia in cloned mice. , 2009, Placenta.

[32]  E. Wolf,et al.  The endometrium responds differently to cloned versus fertilized embryos , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. E. Everts,et al.  Endometrium as an early sensor of in vitro embryo manipulation technologies , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Gregory F Weber,et al.  The physical state of fibronectin matrix differentially regulates morphogenetic movements in vivo. , 2009, Developmental biology.

[35]  S. Brennecke,et al.  Genetic association of the activin A receptor gene (ACVR2A) and pre-eclampsia. , 2009, Molecular human reproduction.

[36]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency , 2009, Development.

[37]  K. Sawai Studies on gene expression in bovine embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. , 2009, The Journal of reproduction and development.

[38]  S. Brennecke,et al.  Association between the candidate susceptibility gene ACVR2A on chromosome 2q22 and pre-eclampsia in a large Norwegian population-based study (the HUNT study) , 2009, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[39]  P. Maddox-Hyttel,et al.  Developmental disparity between in vitro-produced and somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine days 14 and 21 embryos: implications for embryonic loss. , 2008, Reproduction.

[40]  H. Niemann,et al.  Focus on Mammalian Embryogenomics Epigenetic reprogramming in embryonic and foetal development upon somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning , 2008 .

[41]  Stéphane Robin,et al.  Amplification biases: possible differences among deviating gene expressions , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[42]  D. Amarnath,et al.  Comparative gene expression analysis of bovine nuclear-transferred embryos with different developmental potential by cDNA microarray and real-time PCR to determine genes that might reflect calf normality. , 2007, Cloning and stem cells.

[43]  J. Fléchon,et al.  Cellular features of the extra‐embryonic endoderm during elongation in the ovine conceptus , 2007, Genesis.

[44]  J. Renard,et al.  Nuclear reprogramming and pluripotency of embryonic cells: Application to the isolation of embryonic stem cells in farm animals. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[45]  M. Ellersieck,et al.  Morphologic and histologic comparisons between in vivo and nuclear transfer derived porcine embryos , 2007, Molecular reproduction and development.

[46]  G. Apodaca,et al.  Defective CFTR Apical Endocytosis and Enterocyte Brush Border in Myosin VI‐Deficient Mice , 2007, Traffic.

[47]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state , 2007, Nature.

[48]  H. Lewin,et al.  Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[49]  S. Kageyama,et al.  Changes in the mRNA transcripts of insulin-like growth factor ligand, receptors and binding proteins in bovine blastocysts and elongated embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. , 2007, The Journal of reproduction and development.

[50]  Jean-Louis Foulley,et al.  A structural mixed model for variances in differential gene expression studies. , 2007, Genetical research.

[51]  V. Bordignon,et al.  Bovine SNRPN Methylation Imprint in Oocytes and Day 17 In Vitro-Produced and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos1 , 2006, Biology of reproduction.

[52]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[53]  Qi Zhou,et al.  Developmental abnormalities of NT mouse embryos appear early after implantation , 2006, Development.

[54]  W. Wahli,et al.  Differentiation of Trophoblast Giant Cells and Their Metabolic Functions Are Dependent on Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor β/δ , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[55]  G. Mastromonaco,et al.  The impact of chromosomal alteration on embryo development. , 2006, Theriogenology.

[56]  J. Renard,et al.  Molecular evidence for a critical period in mural trophoblast development in bovine blastocysts. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[57]  T. Peura,et al.  Morphological characterization of pre- and peri-implantation in vitro cultured, somatic cell nuclear transfer and in vivo derived ovine embryos. , 2005, Reproduction.

[58]  K. Johnson,et al.  A missense mutation in the previously undescribed gene Tmhs underlies deafness in hurry-scurry (hscy) mice , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  R. E. Everts,et al.  A 7872 cDNA microarray and its use in bovine functional genomics. , 2005, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[60]  Y. Heyman Nuclear transfer: a new tool for reproductive biotechnology in cattle. , 2005, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[61]  C. Viebahn,et al.  Hypoblast controls mesoderm generation and axial patterning in the gastrulating rabbit embryo , 2004, Development Genes and Evolution.

[62]  J. Renard,et al.  Staging of ovine embryos and expression of the T-box genes Brachyury and Eomesodermin around gastrulation. , 2004, Reproduction.

[63]  J. Fléchon,et al.  Gastrulation events in the prestreak pig embryo: Ultrastructure and cell markers , 2004, Genesis.

[64]  X. Yang,et al.  Cloning animals by somatic cell nuclear transfer – biological factors , 2003, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[65]  G. Vajta,et al.  Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterization of the initial post-hatching development of bovine embryos. , 2003, Reproduction.

[66]  C. Moreira-Filho,et al.  Use of primers derived from a new sequence of the bovine Y chromosome for sexing Bos taurus and Bos indicus embryos. , 2003, Theriogenology.

[67]  R. Behringer,et al.  Nodal antagonists in the anterior visceral endoderm prevent the formation of multiple primitive streaks. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[68]  C. Stern,et al.  The hypoblast of the chick embryo positions the primitive streak by antagonizing nodal signaling. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[69]  J. Renard,et al.  Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[70]  C. Viebahn,et al.  Brachyury is expressed in gastrulating bovine embryos well ahead of implantation , 2001, Development Genes and Evolution.

[71]  K. Steel,et al.  Role of myosin VI in the differentiation of cochlear hair cells. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[72]  G. Brem,et al.  Pregnancy rates and births after unilateral or bilateral transfer of bovine embryos produced in vitro. , 1992, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[73]  Y. Heyman,et al.  Maintenance of the corpus luteum after uterine transfer of trophoblastic vesicles to cyclic cows and ewes. , 1984, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[74]  R. Murray,et al.  Observations on the morphogenesis and histochemistry of the bovine pre‐attachment placenta between 16 and 33 days of gestation , 1958, The Anatomical record.

[75]  C. Robert-Granié,et al.  A small set of extra-embryonic genes defines a new landmark for bovine embryo staging. , 2011, Reproduction.

[76]  Guoyao Wu,et al.  Select Nutrients in the Ovine Uterine Lumen. VII. Effects of Arginine, Leucine, Glutamine, and Glucose on Trophectoderm Cell Signaling, Proliferation, and Migration1 , 2011, Biology of reproduction.

[77]  J. Renard,et al.  Faithful reprogramming to pluripotency in mammals - what does nuclear transfer teach us? , 2010, The International journal of developmental biology.

[78]  M. Ramalho-Santos,et al.  Open chromatin in pluripotency and reprogramming , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[79]  S. Khochbin,et al.  Asymmetric nuclear reprogramming in somatic cell nuclear transfer? , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[80]  J. Renard,et al.  Gene expression in elongating and gastrulating embryos from ruminants. , 2007, Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement.

[81]  I. Wilmut Are there any normal clones? , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.

[82]  P. J. Hurtgen,et al.  Production, freezing and transfer of bovine IVF embryos and subsequent calving results , 1995 .

[83]  K. Betteridge,et al.  The anatomy and physiology of pre-attachment bovine embryos , 1988 .