Finite Element Simulation of Deep Excavation Failures

Deep excavations play an increasingly greater role in the development of urban transportation infrastructure facilities such as subway systems and underground space. This paper presents the results of finite element simulations of two deep excavations in soft cohesive soils involving collapse. An enhanced bounding surface soil model characterizes the cohesive soils. The model is anisotropic and is formulated with a non-associative flow rule, but can be degenerated to an isotropic model with associative flow. The results of the excavation simulations give insight into the ground response in terms of lateral wall deflections, ground surface settlements, wall bending moments, and strut force developments. Anisotropic and isotropic versions of model showed differences in simulated results. The insignificant difference in results between the associative and non-associative versions of enhanced bounding surface model is illustrated, but it is expected that, in general, the use of non-associative flow rule will provide a more realistic simulation.

[1]  Richard J. Finno,et al.  Analysis of braced excavations with coupled finite element formulations , 1991 .

[2]  Chang-Yu Ou,et al.  Finite-element analysis of deep excavation in layered sandy and clayey soil deposits , 1994 .

[3]  Hoe I. Ling,et al.  Unified Sand Model Based on the Critical State and Generalized Plasticity , 2006 .

[4]  Fook Hou Lee,et al.  Elasto-plastic consolidation analysis for strutted excavation in clay , 1989 .

[5]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  BOUNDING SURFACE PLASTICITY, I: MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATION AND HYPOPLASTICITY , 1986 .

[6]  Leonard R. Herrmann,et al.  Bounding surface plasticity. II: application to isotropic cohesive soils , 1986 .

[7]  Victor N. Kaliakin,et al.  An Associative and Non-Associative Anisotropic Bounding Surface Model for Clay , 2012 .

[8]  Richard J. Finno,et al.  Performance of a stiff support system in soft clay , 2002 .

[9]  Pio-Go Hsieh,et al.  Basal heave analysis of excavations with consideration of anisotropic undrained strength of clay , 2008 .

[10]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  Simplifications to the bounding surface model for cohesive soils , 1989 .

[11]  Gordon Tung-Chin Kung,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Wall Deflection And Ground Movements Caused by Braced Excavations , 2010 .

[12]  M. Biot General solutions of the equations of elasticity and consolidation for a porous material , 1956 .

[13]  Hoe I. Ling,et al.  A framework of an anisotropic elastoplastic model for clays , 2010 .

[14]  Chang-Yu Ou,et al.  Performance of Diaphragm Wall Constructed Using Top-Down Method , 1998 .

[15]  Nickolas J. Themelis,et al.  ANISOTROPIC ELASTOPLASTIC BOUNDING SURFACE MODEL FOR COHESIVE SOILS , 2002 .

[16]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Analysis of Deep Excavation in Boston , 1993 .

[17]  Kazuo Tani,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF BEARING CAPACITY CHARACTERISTICS OF STRIP FOOTING ON SAND , 1999 .

[18]  G W Clough,et al.  PORE-PRESSURE DISSIPATION DURING EXCAVATION , 1979 .