COMPARISON OF INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF RANIBIZUMAB VERSUS LASER THERAPY FOR ZONE II TREATMENT-REQUIRING RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy and laser therapy for treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in Zone II. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled single-center trial was applied from January 2014 to December 2014; infants who were diagnosed as Zone II treatment-requiring ROP (i.e., Zone II Stage 2 or 3 ROP with plus disease) were randomly assigned to receive IVR monotherapy or laser therapy, and the follow-up interval was at least 6 months. Any eyes that developed recurrence of ROP underwent crossover re-treatment. Results: A total of 100 eyes of 50 ethnic Han Chinese infants were enrolled. At the last follow-up, 26 eyes of 13 infants developed recurrence of ROP in the IVR group and 2 eyes of 1 infant developed recurrence of ROP in the laser therapy group. There was a significant statistical difference in the rate of ROP recurrence between IVR and laser therapy to treat Zone II treatment-requiring ROP (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Although IVR appears to regress ROP to certain levels and continue to promote the vascularization of peripheral retinal vessels, a substantial proportion of infants developed recurrence of ROP after a single-dose IVR. Therefore, IVR is not recommended as a single-dose monotherapy for Zone II treatment-requiring ROP.

[1]  Anna L. Ells,et al.  Are we there yet? Bevacizumab therapy for retinopathy of prematurity , 2011, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[2]  Lois E. H. Smith Through the eyes of a child: understanding retinopathy through ROP the Friedenwald lecture. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  B. Kirchhof,et al.  Serum concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor in an infant treated with ranibizumab for retinopathy of prematurity , 2013, Acta ophthalmologica.

[4]  A. Fielder,et al.  Preliminary results of treatment of eyes with high-risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity in the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  I. Tsui,et al.  REACTIVATION OF RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY AFTER RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT , 2015, Retina.

[6]  S. J. Lee,et al.  Delayed-onset retinal detachment after an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for zone 1 plus retinopathy of prematurity. , 2010, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[7]  W. Tasman,et al.  Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  P. McMenamin,et al.  Fluorescein angiographic observations of peripheral retinal vessel growth in infants after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab as sole therapy for zone I and posterior zone II retinopathy of prematurity , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[9]  San-Ni Chen,et al.  Intravitreal ranibizumab as salvage therapy in an extremely low–birth-weight infant with rush type retinopathy of prematurity , 2012, Oman journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  William V Good,et al.  Final results of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ETROP) randomized trial. , 2004, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[11]  H. Quiroz-Mercado,et al.  Short-term outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab injections for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[12]  M. O’Keefe Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity. , 2011, Irish medical journal.

[13]  C. Baumal,et al.  Primary intravitreal ranibizumab for high-risk retinopathy of prematurity. , 2015, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina.

[14]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Laser photocoagulation (810 nm diode) for threshold retinopathy of prematurity: a prospective randomized pilot study of treatment to ridge and avascular retina versus avascular retina alone , 2011, International Ophthalmology.

[15]  S. Kusaka,et al.  Serum concentrations of bevacizumab (avastin) and vascular endothelial growth factor in infants with retinopathy of prematurity. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  K. Freedman,et al.  Recurrence of Retinopathy of Prematurity Following Bevacizumab Monotherapy: Is It Only the Tip of the Iceberg? , 2013 .

[17]  C. Gilbert Retinopathy of prematurity: a global perspective of the epidemics, population of babies at risk and implications for control. , 2008, Early human development.

[18]  A. Hutchinson,et al.  Outcomes after Intravitreal Bevacizumab versus Laser Photocoagulation for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[19]  S. Wolf,et al.  Intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy to treat retinopathy of prematurity zone II, stage 3 with plus disease , 2015, BMC Ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Flynn,et al.  Retinopathy of prematurity: two distinct mechanisms that underlie zone 1 and zone 2 disease. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  R. Soares,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor plasma levels before and after treatment of neovascular age‐related macular degeneration with bevacizumab or ranibizumab , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[22]  J. Stone,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor acts as a survival factor for newly formed retinal vessels and has implications for retinopathy of prematurity , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[23]  Alice Z Chuang,et al.  Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for stage 3+ retinopathy of prematurity. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Anna L. Ells,et al.  The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  K. Mireskandari,et al.  Treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity with bevacizumab versus laser. , 2015, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.