Why are Tailored Messages More Effective? A Multiple Mediation Analysis of a Breast Cancer Screening Intervention.

Past research has found that tailoring increases the persuasive effectiveness of a message. However, the observed effect has been small and the explanatory mechanism remains unknown. To address these shortcomings, a tailoring software program was created that personalized breast cancer screening pamphlets according to risk, health belief model constructs, and visual preference. Women aged 40 and older (N = 119) participated in a 2 (tailored vs. stock message) × 2 (charts/graphs vs. illustrated visuals) × 3 (nested replications of the visuals) experiment. Participants provided with tailored illustrated pamphlets expressed greater breast cancer screening intentions than those provided with other pamphlets. In a test of 10 different mediators, perceived message relevance was found to fully mediate the tailoring × visual interaction.

[1]  C. Abraham,et al.  Mediator of Moderators: Temporal Stability of Intention and the Intention-Behavior Relation , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[3]  S. Noar,et al.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  B. Rimer,et al.  Advancing Tailored Health Communication: A Persuasion and Message Effects Perspective , 2006 .

[5]  F. Bull,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Printed Health Education Materials: Which Features Lead to Which Outcomes? , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[6]  U. Menon,et al.  The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[7]  V. Strecher,et al.  Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? , 1994, American journal of public health.

[8]  Hyunyi Cho,et al.  Health communication message design : theory and practice , 2012 .

[9]  V. Champion.  Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. , 1999, Research in nursing & health.

[10]  A. Moyer,et al.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[11]  P. Jacobsen,et al.  Tailored versus generic interventions for skin cancer risk reduction for family members of melanoma patients. , 2010, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  I. Lipkus.  Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  The Gender News Use Divide: Americans’ Sex-Typed Selective Exposure to Online News Topics , 2007 .

[15]  Seth M. Noar,et al.  Can Computer-Mediated Interventions Change Theoretical Mediators of Safer Sex? A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[16]  V. Strecher,et al.  One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials , 1999, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[17]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[18]  Matthew W Kreuter,et al.  Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. , 2003, American journal of health behavior.

[19]  D Spiegelman,et al.  Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  S. Haug,et al.  Need for cognition as a predictor and a moderator of outcome in a tailored letters smoking cessation intervention. , 2010, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Avoiding the boomerang: testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[22]  A. Hayes.  PROCESS : A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation , Moderation , and Conditional Process Modeling 1 , 2012 .

[23]  Arie Dijkstra,et al.  The Psychology of Tailoring-Ingredients in Computer-Tailored Persuasion , 2008 .

[24]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  Nancy Grant Harrington,et al.  The Role of Message Tailoring in the Development of Persuasive Health Communication Messages , 2009 .

[26]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[27]  S. Sundar,et al.  Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage , 2010 .

[28]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[29]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Behavioral Constructs and Mammography in Five Ethnic Groups , 2009, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[30]  Mohd Hamid,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool , 2014 .

[31]  A. Hayes.  Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[32]  Hyunyi Cho,et al.  First and Third Person Perceptions on Anti-Drug Ads Among Adolescents , 2008, Commun. Res..

[33]  Katrina Armstrong,et al.  Individualized survival curves improve satisfaction with cancer risk management decisions in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Robert West,et al.  Moderators and mediators of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program among nicotine patch users. , 2006, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[35]  Ken Resnicow,et al.  Tailoring a fruit and vegetable intervention on ethnic identity: results of a randomized study. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[36]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks: Claims, Evidence, and Data Analysis in Experimental Persuasive Message Effects Research , 2003 .

[37]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[38]  James Price Dillard,et al.  The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[39]  Laura R. Olevitch,et al.  Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication With Computer Technology , 1999 .

[40]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing and Decision Outcomes , 2006, MIS Q..

[42]  B. Devellis,et al.  Information Processes Mediate the Effect of a Health Communication Intervention on Fruit and Vegetable Consumption , 2011, Journal of health communication.

[43]  U. Menon,et al.  Development of a self-efficacy scale for mammography. , 2005, Research in nursing & health.

[44]  Steve Booth-Butterfield,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Its Impacton Persuasion Theory and Research , 2002 .

[45]  J. Prochaska,et al.  A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[46]  D K Ahern,et al.  Nudging best practice: the HITECH act and behavioral medicine , 2011, Translational behavioral medicine.

[47]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. , 2008, Health education research.

[48]  S. Sundar,et al.  Relevance to the Rescue: Can “Smart Ads” Reduce Negative Response to Online Ad Clutter? , 2010 .

[49]  Melissa Bondy,et al.  Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[50]  Traci L Mann,et al.  The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. , 2007, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[51]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[52]  Ryan T. Wright,et al.  Shut-up I Don't Care: Understanding the Role of Relevance and Interactivity on Customer Attitudes Toward Repetitive Online Advertising , 2008 .

[53]  Andy J. King,et al.  Perceived Visual Informativeness (PVI): Construct and Scale Development to Assess Visual Information in Printed Materials , 2014, Journal of health communication.

[54]  M. Morrow.  Patterns and Predictors of Mammography Utilization Among Breast Cancer Survivors , 2007 .