Capture the car!: qualitative in-situ methods to grasp the automotive context

In terms of human computer interaction (HCI), the car interior is a space, which can be divided into three areas: the driver's area, the front seat area, and the back seat area. So far HCI researchers have primary focused on the driver, and how in-car electronic devices can be designed to assist the driver in order to increase safety and comfort. We propose that for investigating interactive technology in the car in a holistic way, all three areas have to be taken into account. For that purpose we argue for an increased usage of qualitative in-situ studies, which have been hardly applied in automotive user interface research. So far the HCI community has mainly focused on laboratory studies utilizing driving simulators. Despite the broad range of available field study methods, such as ethnographic and self-reporting studies, the adaption of these methods for the automotive context is challenging due to the specific characteristics of this environment. For instance, cars provide only very limited space, the environment is constantly changing while driving and the driver must not be distracted from driving safely. As a consequence, a lack of experience exists, on how in-situ methods should be applied to cars. In this paper we describe three qualitative in-situ studies, we conducted to research the driver, the front seat passenger, and the rear seat passenger spaces. All three studies used a different method tailored to fit these three areas best. To share our experiences and insights we discuss the strengths and pitfalls of each method.

[1]  Hilary McLellan,et al.  Experience Design , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Driving and ‘Passengering’: Notes on the Ordinary Organization of Car Travel , 2008 .

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  The invisible computer , 1998 .

[4]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Where should i turn: moving from individual to collaborative navigation strategies to inform the interaction design of future navigation systems , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces , 2009, AutomotiveUI.

[6]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  TRAFFIC BEHAVIOUR AS SOCIAL INTERACTION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF ARTIFICIAL DRIVERS , 1999 .

[7]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[8]  Christian A. Müller,et al.  Towards system-mediated car passenger communication , 2009, AutomotiveUI.

[9]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  The effects of Large Scale use of active accelerator pedal in urban areas , 2002 .

[10]  Brendan Walker,et al.  Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty , 2004, INTR.

[11]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Drivers Using Mobile Phones in Traffic: An Ethnographic Study of Interactional Adaptation , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Ethnography: Step-by-Step , 1989 .

[13]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[14]  Andrew W. Gellatly,et al.  Journey: General Motors' move to incorporate contextual design into its next generation of automotive HMI designs , 2010, AutomotiveUI.

[15]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[16]  Dot Hs,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II - Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[17]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Are We There Yet? A Probing Study to Inform Design for the Rear Seat of Family Cars , 2011, INTERACT.

[18]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  In-car gps navigation: engagement with and disengagement from the environment , 2008, CHI.