Adaptive Decision Support Systems for Evaluating Risk and Uncertainty in Capital Investment Decisions: Opportunities for Future Research

The extensive normative literature on capital budgeting decision models tends to ignore many factors that influence choice processes. This paper identifies task factors, context factors, and decision maker factors which influence perceived risk in capital budgeting decisions. Central issues explored in the paper are (a) whether some context and decision maker factors can be included in a capital budgeting decision support system's knowledge system, and (b) whether a decision support system can adapt its choice models and interface to different decision situations based on knowledge about task factors, context factors, and decision maker factors.

[1]  Barry L. Lewis,et al.  An economic modeling approach to contingency theory and management control , 1986 .

[2]  W. Sharpe Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets , 1970 .

[3]  R Burr Porter,et al.  Semivariance and Stochastic Dominance: A Comparison , 1974 .

[4]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Foundations of Decision Support Systems , 1981 .

[5]  William W. Hogan,et al.  Computation of the Efficient Boundary in the E-S Portfolio Selection Model , 1972, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[6]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation , 1984 .

[7]  William J. Baumol,et al.  An Expected Gain-Confidence Limit Criterion for Portfolio Selection , 1963 .

[8]  Surendra P. Agrawal Concepts, Theory, and Techniques INFLATION, MAINTENANCE OF CAPITAL, AND THE IRR MODEL OF CAPITAL BUDGETING* , 1986 .

[9]  J. March Ambiguity and accounting: The elusive link between information and decision making☆ , 1987 .

[10]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[11]  P. Schoemaker The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .

[12]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  A framework for designing adaptive DSS interfaces , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Gary L. Sundem,et al.  Capital Budgeting Methods and Risk: A Further Analysis , 1980 .

[14]  R. Kaplan Measuring manufacturing performance: a new challenge for managerial accounting research , 1983 .

[15]  Harold Bierman,et al.  Choices with Risk: Beyond the Mean and Variance , 1970 .

[16]  John W. Payne,et al.  Preferences among gambles with equal underlying distributions , 1971 .

[17]  O. Svenson Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[18]  James C. T. Mao,et al.  SURVEY OF CAPITAL BUDGETING: THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1970 .

[19]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Feedback in DSS as a Source of Control: Experiments with the Timing of Feedback , 1991 .

[20]  F. Hillier THE DERIVATION OF PROBABILISTIC INFORMATION FOR THE EVALUATION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS , 1963 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[22]  John W. Payne,et al.  Alternative approaches to decision making under risk: Moments versus risk dimensions. , 1973 .

[23]  V. Govindarajan Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable☆ , 1984 .

[24]  Moment- versus dimension-oriented theories of risky choice: A (fairly) general test involving single-peaked preferences. , 1984 .

[25]  William W. Hogan,et al.  Toward the Development of an Equilibrium Capital-Market Model Based on Semivariance , 1974, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[26]  P. Schoemaker Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis , 1980 .

[27]  James C. T. Mao,et al.  Models of Capital Budgeting, E-V VS E-S , 1970, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[28]  Susan F. Haka,et al.  CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES AND FIRM SPECIFIC CONTINGENCIES: A CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS. , 1987 .

[29]  P. Slovic,et al.  Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking , 1968 .

[30]  K. Weick,et al.  Management accounting and action , 1987 .

[31]  P. Bromiley Testing a Causal Model of Corporate Risk Taking and Performance , 1991 .

[32]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business Decisions: A Survey and Evaluation , 1977 .

[33]  Robert L. Winkler State of the Art: RESEARCH DIRECTIONS IN DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY* , 1982 .