Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Callaway,et al. Root herbivores, pathogenic fungi, and competition between Centaurea maculosa and Festuca idahoensis , 2003, Plant Ecology.
[2] S. Louda,et al. Nontarget effects--the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.
[3] C. Mitchell,et al. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens , 2003, Nature.
[4] A. Ives,et al. COMPETITION BETWEEN NATIVE AND INTRODUCED PARASITOIDS OF APHIDS: NONTARGET EFFECTS AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL , 2002 .
[5] C. O'brien†,et al. Unexpected Ecological Effects of Distributing the Exotic Weevil, Larinus planus (F.), for the Biological Control of Canada Thistle , 2002 .
[6] J. Klironomos. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities , 2002, Nature.
[7] Andrea F. Huberty,et al. BOTTOM‐UP FORCES MEDIATE NATURAL‐ENEMY IMPACT IN A PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECT COMMUNITY , 2002 .
[8] J. Vivanco,et al. Enantiomeric-Dependent Phytotoxic and Antimicrobial Activity of (±)-Catechin. A Rhizosecreted Racemic Mixture from Spotted Knapweed1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.
[9] M. Crawley,et al. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis , 2002 .
[10] J. Bascompte,et al. Feral pigs facilitate hyperpredation by golden eagles and indirectly cause the decline of the island fox , 2001 .
[11] J Memmott,et al. Infiltration of a Hawaiian Community by Introduced Biological Control Agents , 2001, Science.
[12] R. Callaway,et al. Compensatory growth and competitive ability of an invasive weed are enhanced by soil fungi and native neighbours , 2001 .
[13] E. Simms,et al. Rodent‐limited establishment of bush lupine: field experiments on the cumulative effect of granivory , 2001 .
[14] G. Wheeler,et al. Lessons from Unsuccessful Attempts to Establish Spodoptera pectinicornis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a Biological Control Agent of Waterlettuce , 2001 .
[15] D. Simberloff,et al. Reply from J. Myers, D. Simberloff, A. Kuris and J. Carey , 2000 .
[16] T. Backeljau,et al. Eradication of exotic species , 2000 .
[17] Robert W. Pemberton,et al. Predictable risk to native plants in weed biological control , 2000, Oecologia.
[18] J. Elkinton,et al. Effects of a Biological Control Introduction on Three Nontarget Native Species of Saturniid Moths , 2000, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[19] E. Aschehoug,et al. Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. , 2000, Science.
[20] D. Strong,et al. Biological Control of Invading Species--Risk and Reform , 2000, Science.
[21] D. Simberloff,et al. BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .
[22] R. Denno,et al. HOST PLANTS MEDIATE OMNIVORE–HERBIVORE INTERACTIONS AND INFLUENCE PREY SUPPRESSION , 2000 .
[23] L. Ruggiero,et al. Non-target effects of an introduced biological control agent on deer mouse ecology , 2000, Oecologia.
[24] Peter B. McEvoy,et al. Why Things Bite Back: Unintended Consequences of Biological Weed Control , 2000 .
[25] Jefferies. Allochthonous inputs: integrating population changes and food-web dynamics. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[26] Jian J. Duan,et al. Nontarget Effects of Biological Control , 2000, Springer US.
[27] R. Callaway,et al. MYCORRHIZAE INDIRECTLY ENHANCE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF AN INVASIVE FORB ON A NATIVE BUNCHGRASS , 1999 .
[28] R. Callaway,et al. Biological-control herbivores may increase competitive ability of the noxious weed Centaurea maculosa , 1999 .
[29] P. McEvoy,et al. BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PLANT INVADERS: REGIONAL PATTERNS, FIELD EXPERIMENTS, AND STRUCTURED POPULATION MODELS , 1999 .
[30] R. Denno,et al. POSITIVE PREDATOR–PREDATOR INTERACTIONS: ENHANCED PREDATION RATES AND SYNERGISTIC SUPPRESSION OF APHID POPULATIONS , 1998 .
[31] K. McCann,et al. Food Web Stability: The Influence of Trophic Flows across Habitats , 1998, The American Naturalist.
[32] M. Thomas,et al. Biocontrol-risky but necessary? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[33] J. H. Frank. HOW RISKY IS BIOLOGICAL CONTROL? COMMENT , 1998 .
[34] D. Simberloff,et al. HOW RISKY IS BIOLOGICAL CONTROL? REPLY , 1998 .
[35] R E McFadyen,et al. Biological control of weeds. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.
[36] Daniel Simberloff,et al. Ecological Effects of an Insect Introduced for the Biological Control of Weeds , 1997 .
[37] J. Wootton,et al. ESTIMATES AND TESTS OF PER CAPITA INTERACTION STRENGTH: DIET, ABUNDANCE, AND IMPACT OF INTERTIDALLY FORAGING BIRDS , 1997 .
[38] Daniel Simberloff,et al. Risks of species introduced for biological control , 1996 .
[39] Daniel Simberloff,et al. How Risky is Biological Control , 1996 .
[40] J. Castilla,et al. Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .
[41] Guthrie S. Zimmerman,et al. SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE DIET OF GREAT HORNED OWLS (BUBO VIRGINIANUS) ON SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE , 1996 .
[42] P. McEvoy. Host Specificity and Biological Pest Control How well is research on host specificity addressing the potential risks of biological control , 1996 .
[43] P. Kareiva,et al. Perils and pitfalls in the host specificity paradigm , 1996 .
[44] G. Polis,et al. Food Web Complexity and Community Dynamics , 1996, The American Naturalist.
[45] R. Nowierski,et al. Cause and Extent of Predation on Urophora spp. Larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Spotted Knapweed Capitula , 1995 .
[46] J. Childs,et al. Serologic and genetic identification of Peromyscus maniculatus as the primary rodent reservoir for a new hantavirus in the southwestern United States. , 1994, The Journal of infectious diseases.
[47] M. Julien,et al. Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds , 1992 .
[48] J. Lacey,et al. Effects of defoliation, shading and competition on spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. , 1992 .
[49] H. Müller-Schärer. THE IMPACT OF ROOT HERBIVORY AS A FUNCTION OF PLANT DENSITY AND COMPETITION: SURVIVAL, GROWTH AND FECUNDITY OF CENTAUREA MACULOSA IN FIELD PLOTS , 1991 .
[50] J. Linsley. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL I , 1991 .
[51] F. Howarth. Environmental Impacts of Classical Biological Control , 1991 .
[52] C. N. Spencer,et al. SHRIMP STOCKING, SALMON COLLAPSE, AND EAGLE DISPLACEMENT , 1991 .
[53] M. Power,et al. Effects of Fish in River Food Webs , 1990, Science.
[54] G. Nuessly,et al. Natural enemies and host-plant asynchrony contributing to the failure of the introduced moth, Coleophora parthenica Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), to control Russian thistle , 1990 .
[55] William H. Settle,et al. Invasion by the variegated leafhopper and biotic interactions: parasitism, competition, and apparent competition. , 1990 .
[56] D. Pimentel,et al. Critical Issues in Biological Control , 1990 .
[57] L. Ehler. Environmental impact of introduced biological-control agents: implications for agricultural biotechnology. , 1990 .
[58] R. L. Kluge. Prospects for the biological control of trifid weed, Chromolaena odorata, in Southern Africa. , 1990 .
[59] N. W. Moore,et al. The Bird of Time , 1988 .
[60] U. Fish. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants , 1987 .
[61] D. M. Maddox. Biological Control of Diffuse Knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and Spotted Knapweed (C. maculosa) , 1982, Weed Science.
[62] S. Louda,et al. Biotic Interference with Insects Imported for Weed Control , 1976 .
[63] R. Doutt,et al. Pest control:biological, physical, and selected chemical methods , 1967 .
[64] C. Huffaker,et al. A Ten-Year Study of Vegetational Changes Associated with Biological Control of Klamath Weed. , 1959 .
[65] E. S. King. The bird of time. , 1957, The Medical journal of Australia.