Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents

[1]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root herbivores, pathogenic fungi, and competition between Centaurea maculosa and Festuca idahoensis , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[2]  S. Louda,et al.  Nontarget effects--the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[3]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens , 2003, Nature.

[4]  A. Ives,et al.  COMPETITION BETWEEN NATIVE AND INTRODUCED PARASITOIDS OF APHIDS: NONTARGET EFFECTS AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL , 2002 .

[5]  C. O'brien†,et al.  Unexpected Ecological Effects of Distributing the Exotic Weevil, Larinus planus (F.), for the Biological Control of Canada Thistle , 2002 .

[6]  J. Klironomos Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities , 2002, Nature.

[7]  Andrea F. Huberty,et al.  BOTTOM‐UP FORCES MEDIATE NATURAL‐ENEMY IMPACT IN A PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECT COMMUNITY , 2002 .

[8]  J. Vivanco,et al.  Enantiomeric-Dependent Phytotoxic and Antimicrobial Activity of (±)-Catechin. A Rhizosecreted Racemic Mixture from Spotted Knapweed1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[9]  M. Crawley,et al.  Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis , 2002 .

[10]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Feral pigs facilitate hyperpredation by golden eagles and indirectly cause the decline of the island fox , 2001 .

[11]  J Memmott,et al.  Infiltration of a Hawaiian Community by Introduced Biological Control Agents , 2001, Science.

[12]  R. Callaway,et al.  Compensatory growth and competitive ability of an invasive weed are enhanced by soil fungi and native neighbours , 2001 .

[13]  E. Simms,et al.  Rodent‐limited establishment of bush lupine: field experiments on the cumulative effect of granivory , 2001 .

[14]  G. Wheeler,et al.  Lessons from Unsuccessful Attempts to Establish Spodoptera pectinicornis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a Biological Control Agent of Waterlettuce , 2001 .

[15]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Reply from J. Myers, D. Simberloff, A. Kuris and J. Carey , 2000 .

[16]  T. Backeljau,et al.  Eradication of exotic species , 2000 .

[17]  Robert W. Pemberton,et al.  Predictable risk to native plants in weed biological control , 2000, Oecologia.

[18]  J. Elkinton,et al.  Effects of a Biological Control Introduction on Three Nontarget Native Species of Saturniid Moths , 2000, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[19]  E. Aschehoug,et al.  Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. , 2000, Science.

[20]  D. Strong,et al.  Biological Control of Invading Species--Risk and Reform , 2000, Science.

[21]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[22]  R. Denno,et al.  HOST PLANTS MEDIATE OMNIVORE–HERBIVORE INTERACTIONS AND INFLUENCE PREY SUPPRESSION , 2000 .

[23]  L. Ruggiero,et al.  Non-target effects of an introduced biological control agent on deer mouse ecology , 2000, Oecologia.

[24]  Peter B. McEvoy,et al.  Why Things Bite Back: Unintended Consequences of Biological Weed Control , 2000 .

[25]  Jefferies Allochthonous inputs: integrating population changes and food-web dynamics. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Jian J. Duan,et al.  Nontarget Effects of Biological Control , 2000, Springer US.

[27]  R. Callaway,et al.  MYCORRHIZAE INDIRECTLY ENHANCE COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF AN INVASIVE FORB ON A NATIVE BUNCHGRASS , 1999 .

[28]  R. Callaway,et al.  Biological-control herbivores may increase competitive ability of the noxious weed Centaurea maculosa , 1999 .

[29]  P. McEvoy,et al.  BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF PLANT INVADERS: REGIONAL PATTERNS, FIELD EXPERIMENTS, AND STRUCTURED POPULATION MODELS , 1999 .

[30]  R. Denno,et al.  POSITIVE PREDATOR–PREDATOR INTERACTIONS: ENHANCED PREDATION RATES AND SYNERGISTIC SUPPRESSION OF APHID POPULATIONS , 1998 .

[31]  K. McCann,et al.  Food Web Stability: The Influence of Trophic Flows across Habitats , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[32]  M. Thomas,et al.  Biocontrol-risky but necessary? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  J. H. Frank HOW RISKY IS BIOLOGICAL CONTROL? COMMENT , 1998 .

[34]  D. Simberloff,et al.  HOW RISKY IS BIOLOGICAL CONTROL? REPLY , 1998 .

[35]  R E McFadyen,et al.  Biological control of weeds. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[36]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Ecological Effects of an Insect Introduced for the Biological Control of Weeds , 1997 .

[37]  J. Wootton,et al.  ESTIMATES AND TESTS OF PER CAPITA INTERACTION STRENGTH: DIET, ABUNDANCE, AND IMPACT OF INTERTIDALLY FORAGING BIRDS , 1997 .

[38]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Risks of species introduced for biological control , 1996 .

[39]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  How Risky is Biological Control , 1996 .

[40]  J. Castilla,et al.  Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .

[41]  Guthrie S. Zimmerman,et al.  SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE DIET OF GREAT HORNED OWLS (BUBO VIRGINIANUS) ON SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE , 1996 .

[42]  P. McEvoy Host Specificity and Biological Pest Control How well is research on host specificity addressing the potential risks of biological control , 1996 .

[43]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Perils and pitfalls in the host specificity paradigm , 1996 .

[44]  G. Polis,et al.  Food Web Complexity and Community Dynamics , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[45]  R. Nowierski,et al.  Cause and Extent of Predation on Urophora spp. Larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Spotted Knapweed Capitula , 1995 .

[46]  J. Childs,et al.  Serologic and genetic identification of Peromyscus maniculatus as the primary rodent reservoir for a new hantavirus in the southwestern United States. , 1994, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[47]  M. Julien,et al.  Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds , 1992 .

[48]  J. Lacey,et al.  Effects of defoliation, shading and competition on spotted knapweed and bluebunch wheatgrass. , 1992 .

[49]  H. Müller-Schärer THE IMPACT OF ROOT HERBIVORY AS A FUNCTION OF PLANT DENSITY AND COMPETITION: SURVIVAL, GROWTH AND FECUNDITY OF CENTAUREA MACULOSA IN FIELD PLOTS , 1991 .

[50]  J. Linsley ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL I , 1991 .

[51]  F. Howarth Environmental Impacts of Classical Biological Control , 1991 .

[52]  C. N. Spencer,et al.  SHRIMP STOCKING, SALMON COLLAPSE, AND EAGLE DISPLACEMENT , 1991 .

[53]  M. Power,et al.  Effects of Fish in River Food Webs , 1990, Science.

[54]  G. Nuessly,et al.  Natural enemies and host-plant asynchrony contributing to the failure of the introduced moth, Coleophora parthenica Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), to control Russian thistle , 1990 .

[55]  William H. Settle,et al.  Invasion by the variegated leafhopper and biotic interactions: parasitism, competition, and apparent competition. , 1990 .

[56]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Critical Issues in Biological Control , 1990 .

[57]  L. Ehler Environmental impact of introduced biological-control agents: implications for agricultural biotechnology. , 1990 .

[58]  R. L. Kluge Prospects for the biological control of trifid weed, Chromolaena odorata, in Southern Africa. , 1990 .

[59]  N. W. Moore,et al.  The Bird of Time , 1988 .

[60]  U. Fish Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants , 1987 .

[61]  D. M. Maddox Biological Control of Diffuse Knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and Spotted Knapweed (C. maculosa) , 1982, Weed Science.

[62]  S. Louda,et al.  Biotic Interference with Insects Imported for Weed Control , 1976 .

[63]  R. Doutt,et al.  Pest control:biological, physical, and selected chemical methods , 1967 .

[64]  C. Huffaker,et al.  A Ten-Year Study of Vegetational Changes Associated with Biological Control of Klamath Weed. , 1959 .

[65]  E. S. King The bird of time. , 1957, The Medical journal of Australia.