Personal data privacy protection in an age of globalization: the US-EU safe harbor compromise

Hypotheses on the impact of global trade and information flows on state sovereignty and interstate policy convergence have proliferated ahead of empirical studies assessing their explanatory accuracy or predictive powers. The recent personal data privacy protection dispute between the European Union and the United States is a critical case study for examining and refining many of these hypotheses. Personal data privacy protection is a policy realm at once at the forefront of trade and information technology and one that implicates fundamental cultural beliefs and domestic practices. Thus, it is a dispute where the forces allegedly driving and resisting 'globalization' are present. This paper will analyze the 1998 EU Data Protection Directive and the 'safe harbor' compromise agreement between the European Union and the United States to advance the debate over the impact of globalization on state sovereignty, the respective importance and interplay of external and internal forces in shaping state policy, and whether and when the forces of globalization contribute to a reduction in regulation (a 'race-to-the-bottom') or to a higher level of protective regulation ('a race-to-the-top').

[1]  T. Friedman.  The Lexus and the Olive Tree , 1999 .

[2]  Robert Gellman,et al.  None of Your Business: World Data Flows, Electronic Commerce, and the European Privacy Directive , 1999 .

[3]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[4]  K. Ohmae,et al.  The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies , 1995 .

[5]  Graham Bell,et al.  A Comparative Method , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Who Knows? : Safeguarding Your Privacy in a Networked World , 1995 .

[7]  R. Kudrle.  Does globalization sap the fiscal power of the state , 2003 .

[8]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. By Colin J. Bennett. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992. 263p. $39.95 cloth, $16.95 paper. , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[9]  N. Polsby,et al.  Case Study and Theory in Political Science , 1975 .

[10]  J. Mayall.  Globalization and international relations , 1998, Review of International Studies.

[11]  Linda Weiss,et al.  The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era , 1998 .

[12]  L. Thurow.  Globalization: The Product of a Knowledge-Based Economy , 2000 .

[13]  Colin J. Bennett.  Regulating privacy: data protection and public policy in europe and the u , 1992 .

[14]  I. Clark.  Globalization and International Relations Theory , 1999 .

[15]  Daniel Yergin,et al.  The commanding heights : the battle between government and the marketplace that is remaking the modern world , 1998 .

[16]  E. Kapstein.  Governing the Global Economy: International Finance and the State , 1994 .

[17]  S. Lenway,et al.  Technonationalism and cooperation in a globalizing industry: The case of flat-panel displays , 2003 .

[18]  J. Vogler,et al.  The European Union as a global actor , 1999 .

[19]  Brigitte Unger.  Limits of Convergence and Globalization1 , 1997 .

[20]  D. Spar,et al.  Ruling the Net , 1996 .

[21]  M. Wolf.  Will the Nation-State Survive Globalization? , 2001 .

[22]  J. Scholte.  Globalization: A Critical Introduction , 2000 .

[23]  Julia M. Fromholz.  The European Union Data Privacy Directive , 2000 .

[24]  I. Wallerstein.  States? Sovereignty? : The dilemmas of capitalists in an age of transition , 1999 .

[25]  Colin J. Bennett.  Convergence revisited: toward a global policy for the protection of personal data? , 1997 .

[26]  R. Falk.  Predatory Globalization: A Critique , 1999 .

[27]  G. Arrighi.  Globalization, state sovereignty, and the “endless” accumulation of capital , 1999 .

[28]  R. Falk.  State of siege: will globalization win out? , 1997 .

[29]  Markus M. L. Crepaz,et al.  Democracy and Institutions: The Life Work of Arend Lijphart , 2000 .

[30]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[31]  David A. Smith,et al.  States and sovereignty in the global economy , 1999 .

[32]  P. Cerny.  The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State , 1990 .

[33]  B. Buzan.  After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy , 1985 .

[34]  David A. Smith,et al.  The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy , 1998 .

[35]  Kenneth Surin.  The wealth of states: A comparative sociology of international economic and political change , 1999 .

[36]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  A Race to the Bottom or Governance from the Top , 2000 .

[37]  J. Gottmann,et al.  Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography , 1993 .

[38]  David Banisar,et al.  Global Trends in Privacy Protection: An International Survey of Privacy, Data Protection, and Surveillance Laws and Developments , 2012 .

[39]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  7. Managing Privacy Concerns Strategically: The Implications of Fair Information Practices for Marketing in the Twenty-first Century , 1999 .

[40]  J. Perraton.  The global economy—myths and realities , 2001 .

[41]  J. Hart,et al.  Coping with globalization , 2000 .

[42]  Ronald Dore,et al.  National diversity and global capitalism , 1996 .

[43]  Joel R. Reidenberg,et al.  Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace , 2000 .

[44]  J. Sempsey.  The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives , 1998 .

[45]  Robert Gellman,et al.  Data privacy law: A study of United States data protection , 1997 .

[46]  Anthony Mcgrew,et al.  Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture , 2000 .