How to Increase Exploration within the TQM Practice

Abstract Balancing exploitation (e.g. refinement and extension of existing competencies) with the need for exploration (e.g. experimentation with alternatives) is a hard task because, in essence, exploration and exploitation are contradictory organizational processes. However, the effectiveness of TQM requires that managers overcome this apparent paradox by tailoring their organization's balance between exploitation and exploration. This study has shown that exploration and exploitation is substantially different. In general, exploration is associated with weak-tie partners, organic structures, chaotic culture and autonomy. Exploitation is associated with mechanistic structures, tightly controlled systems, organizational memory, bureaucracy and stable markets.

[1]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[2]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[3]  Mary Ann Glynn,et al.  Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual intelligences to innovation. , 1996 .

[4]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Winning through innovation , 1997 .

[5]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[6]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[7]  Adler,et al.  Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system , 1999 .

[8]  M. Glynn Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation , 1996 .

[9]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The Discipline of Innovation : Harvard Business Review , 1987 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Mukesh Bhargava,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1993 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[13]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[14]  P. Drucker The discipline of innovation. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[15]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[16]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[17]  W. Buckley Society as a Complex Adaptive System , 2008 .

[18]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[19]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[20]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[21]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[22]  P. Ghemawat,et al.  Organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency, The , 1993 .

[23]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[24]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .