HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS Trial): Procedural Safety and Operator-Assessed Efficacy Results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Coated coils have been in clinical use for several years without robust evidence to determine their safety/efficacy. The HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS) addresses this deficiency for the HydroCoil embolic system. This article reports periprocedural safety/operator-assessed angiographic results from HELPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to the hydrogel coil or control arms by using concealed allocation with minimization matching groups. Any bare platinum coils were allowed in the control arm, and assist devices could be used as clinically required. Both recently ruptured and not recently ruptured/unruptured aneurysms were included. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-nine patients were recruited. Coiling was successful in 98.6%. Mean aneurysm size was 6.5 mm (26% were ≥10 mm), 53% were recently ruptured aneurysms, and an assist device was used in 46%. Seventy procedural adverse events were reported in hydrogel coils and 86 in control arms. The 3-month mortality rate was 3.6% in hydrogel coils and 2.0% in control arms; the difference was not significant (P = .6). There was a lower 2-month mortality rate in the HELPS subarachnoid hemorrhage cohort (4.1%) than would be anticipated from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (7%). There was a trend toward increased adverse events when assist devices were used, which was substantial for stents deployed in recently ruptured aneurysms. Ninety-six percent of patients discharged were World Federation of Neurosurgeons grade 0–2 at discharge. No difference was found between arms in the operator assessment of angiographic occlusions (P = .3). CONCLUSION: These HELPS results reinforce coiling as an effective treatment for aneurysms, with an excellent technical success rate. Hydrogel coils can be used in a wide spectrum of aneurysms with a risk profile equivalent to that of bare platinum.

[1]  J. Lamoureux,et al.  Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms With Detachable Coils , 2003, Stroke.

[2]  P. Summers,et al.  Retreatment of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in Patients Randomized by Coiling or Clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) , 2007, Stroke.

[3]  J. Slattery,et al.  A systematic review of the risks of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. , 1996, Stroke.

[4]  D. Nichols,et al.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment , 2003, The Lancet.

[5]  Fernando Viñuela,et al.  Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. 1997. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  D. Pelz,et al.  Thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  A. Algra,et al.  Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. , 1999, Stroke.

[8]  D. Kallmes,et al.  Aneurysm packing with HydroCoil Embolic System versus platinum coils: initial clinical experience. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  Per Soelberg Sørensen,et al.  Resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow and intracranial pressure in patients with hydrocephalus after subarachnoid haemorrhage , 1987 .

[10]  A. Molyneux International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[11]  Michel E. Mawad,et al.  Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm , 1997 .

[12]  F. Vale,et al.  The relationship of subarachnoid hemorrhage and the need for postoperative shunting. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  James V. Byrne,et al.  Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding , 1999 .

[14]  P. Keston,et al.  The endovascular management of pericallosal artery aneurysms. , 2004, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[15]  A. Molyneux,et al.  Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  Stephan Felber,et al.  Endovascular Coil Occlusion of 1811 Intracranial Aneurysms: Early Angiographic and Clinical Results , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[17]  D. Kallmes,et al.  New expandable hydrogel-platinum coil hybrid device for aneurysm embolization. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  H. Cloft HydroCoil for Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion (HEAL) study: 3-6 month angiographic follow-up results. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[19]  D. Kallmes,et al.  Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with Guglielmi detachable coils: a meta-analysis. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  G. Duckwiler,et al.  Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  P. Sandercock,et al.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion , 2005, The Lancet.

[22]  C. Cognard,et al.  Intracranial berry aneurysms: angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. , 1998, Radiology.

[23]  M Bynevelt,et al.  Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Analysis of Midterm Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes , 2002, Stroke.

[24]  M. Sluzewski,et al.  Procedural complications of coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: incidence and risk factors in a consecutive series of 681 patients. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[25]  I. B. Ross,et al.  Complications of endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. , 2005, Surgical neurology.

[26]  C. Drake,et al.  Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. , 1988, Journal of neurosurgery.