The use of EDI for interorganisational co‐operation and co‐ordination in the supply chain

This article analyses the moderation effect of co‐operation on electronic data interchange (EDI) adoption, and the influence of EDI use on the co‐ordinating activities in the automotive supply chain. The empirical results from a survey of 116 Spanish automotive suppliers indicate that EDI adopters perceive more operational benefits, more external pressure and mutual understanding, and fewer technical and organisational difficulties than do non‐adopters of EDI. The use of EDI is greater among suppliers that perceive more strategic benefits and fewer cost and organisational difficulties, have a proactive management, are less dependence on suppliers, and adopt EDI earlier. Co‐operation is a moderator of organisational difficulties for EDI adoption and use, and strategic benefits for the use of EDI. The results also show that companies use EDI to become more co‐ordinated with suppliers and customers.

[1]  David Wilemon,et al.  Excelling in R&D , 2000 .

[2]  Larry J. LeBlanc,et al.  Adoption of electronic data interchange: the role of buyer-supplier relationships , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[3]  Paul B. Cragg,et al.  Small-Firm Computing: Motivators and Inhibitors , 1993, MIS Q..

[4]  Gregory M. Magnan,et al.  The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration , 2002 .

[5]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[6]  Gary D. Scudder,et al.  The use of electronic data interchange for supply chain coordination in the food industry , 2002 .

[7]  T. Das,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[8]  Ravinder Nath,et al.  Success factors for domestic and international electronic data interchange (EDI) implementation for US firms , 2001, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[9]  Ali F. Farhoomand,et al.  Innovation adoption of EDI , 1996 .

[10]  Basuki Y. Iskandar,et al.  Business-to-business electronic commerce from first- and second-tier automotive suppliers' perspectives: a preliminary analysis for hypotheses generation , 2001 .

[11]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[12]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[13]  Lyne Bouchard,et al.  Decision Criteria in the Adoption of EDI , 1993, ICIS.

[14]  I. G. Esteban,et al.  Fundamentos y técnicas de investigación comercial , 1994 .

[15]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[16]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  The Role of Interorganizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Interorganizational Systems , 1995 .

[18]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[19]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[20]  William G. Egelhoff,et al.  Innovative capabilities of a firm and the use of technical alliances , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[21]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen,et al.  Opportunities of effective integration of EDI for small businesses in the automotive industry , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[23]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[24]  Peggy A. Golden,et al.  THE EFFECT OF REPUTATION ON THE DECISION TO JOINT VENTURE , 1997 .

[25]  Prashant C. Palvia,et al.  EDI in strategic supply chain: impact on customer service , 2001, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Determinants of Small Business EDI Adoption: An Empirical Investigation , 2001, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..