Effects of obstacles and deposited coal dust on characteristics of premixed methane–air explosions in a long closed pipe

Abstract An experimental system including pressure transducer, electric spark ignition device, data acquisition and control unit was set up to investigate methane–air explosions in a horizontal pipe closed at both ends with or without the presence of obstacles and deposited coal dust. The experimental results show that explosion characteristics depended on the methane content, on the layout of obstacles, and on the deposited coal dust. Pressure fluctuation with a frequency of 150 Hz appeared in its crest when the methane content was close to the stoichiometric ratio (9.5% methane percentage by volume). The pressure rise rate increased locally when a single obstacle was mounted in the pipe, but it had little effect on the pressure peak. Repeated obstacles mounted in the pipe caused the pressure to rise sharply, and the mean maximum explosion overpressure increased with the increase of the obstacle’s number. The amplitude of pressure fluctuation was reduced when deposited coal dust was paved in the bottom of the pipe. However, when repeated obstacles were arranged inside, the maximum overpressures were higher with coal dust deposited than pure gas explosions.

[1]  S. Ibrahim,et al.  The effects of obstructions on overpressure resulting from premixed flame deflagration , 2001 .

[2]  Craig T. Johansen,et al.  Visualization of the unburned gas flow field ahead of an accelerating flame in an obstructed square channel , 2009 .

[3]  Gordon E. Andrews,et al.  Gas explosions in long closed vessels , 1991 .

[4]  Michael J. Pegg,et al.  The ignitability of coal dust-air and methane-coal dust-air mixtures , 1993 .

[5]  Salah S. Ibrahim,et al.  Experimental study of premixed flame propagation over various solid obstructions , 2000 .

[6]  S. Ibrahim,et al.  Effects of position and frequency of obstacles on turbulent premixed propagating flames , 2009 .

[7]  Dal Jae Park,et al.  Experiments on the effects of multiple obstacles in vented explosion chambers. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Jan Kindracki,et al.  Influence of ignition position and obstacles on explosion development in methane–air mixture in closed vessels , 2007 .

[9]  G. Ciccarelli,et al.  Effect of obstacle size and spacing on the initial stage of flame acceleration in a rough tube , 2005 .

[10]  Gordon E. Andrews,et al.  The acceleration of flame propagation in a tube by an obstacle , 1991 .

[11]  S. Ibrahim,et al.  Experimental investigation of flame/solid interactions in turbulent premixed combustion , 2001 .

[12]  H. Phylaktou,et al.  The influence of flow blockage on the rate of pressure rise in Large L/D cylindrical closed vessel explosions , 1990 .

[13]  Jin-hua Sun,et al.  Flame propagation in hybrid mixture of coal dust and methane , 2007 .

[14]  H. Phylaktou,et al.  Fast flame speeds and rates of pressure rise in the initial period of gas explosions in large L/D cylindrical enclosures , 1990 .

[15]  John H. S. Lee,et al.  Flame acceleration due to turbulence produced by obstacles , 1980 .

[16]  Domnina Razus,et al.  Explosion pressures of hydrocarbon-air mixtures in closed vessels. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Hwang-Jin Kim,et al.  A study on the obstacle-induced variation of the gas explosion characteristics , 2001 .

[18]  C. Clanet,et al.  On the "Tulip Flame" Phenomenon , 1996 .