Collaboration in Metagenomics: Sequence Databases and the Organization of Scientific Work

In this paper we conduct an ethnographic study of work to explore the interaction between scientific collaboration and computing technologies in the emerging science of metagenomics. In particular, we explore how databases serve to organize scientific collaboration. We find databases existing across scientific communities where scientists have different practices and priorities. We suggest while these databases appear to be boundary objects, they are better understood as boundary negotiating artifacts. Due to rapid scientific and technical innovation the tools, practices, and scientific questions change over the course of merely a few years resulting in challenges for collaboration.

[1]  Philip Hugenholtz,et al.  Impact of Culture-Independent Studies on the Emerging Phylogenetic View of Bacterial Diversity , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Boundary Objects and Prototypes at the Interfaces of Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[3]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[4]  Mark Pendergast,et al.  Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP 2003, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, November 9-12, 2003 , 2003, GROUP.

[5]  J. Durlak.  The Language of New Media , 2002 .

[6]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[7]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Achieving safety: a field study of boundary objects in aircraft technical support , 2002, CSCW '02.

[8]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Ordering Systems: Coordinative Practices and Artifacts in Architectural Design and Planning , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[9]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Supporting shared information systems: boundary objects, communities, and brokering , 2000, ICIS.

[10]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Coordinative Artifacts in Architectural Practise , 2002, COOP.

[12]  Rob Procter,et al.  'Safety in numbers': calculation and document re-use in knowledge work , 2001, GROUP.

[13]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Ontologies in Bioinformatics , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[14]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Bioinformatics for Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing of Microbial Communities , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Potential for phosphonoacetate utilization by marine bacteria in temperate coastal waters. , 2009, Environmental microbiology.

[16]  R. Harper,et al.  Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology, and Organizational Action , 1997 .

[17]  L. Fulton,et al.  Diet-induced obesity is linked to marked but reversible alterations in the mouse distal gut microbiome. , 2008, Cell host & microbe.

[18]  Allan Kuchinsky,et al.  When worlds collide: Molecular biology as interdisciplinary collaboration , 2001, ECSCW.

[19]  Carla Simone,et al.  Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  J. Handelsman,et al.  Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. , 1998, Chemistry & biology.

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[22]  P LeeCharlotte.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts , 2007 .

[23]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[24]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[25]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering , 2003, GROUP.

[26]  Christine Hine,et al.  Databases as Scientific Instruments and Their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work , 2006 .

[27]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work , 2001 .

[28]  Michael B. Usher,et al.  Science in action , 1993, Nature.

[29]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[31]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[32]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[33]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.