Continuous visual control of interception.

People generally try to keep their eyes on a moving target that they intend to catch or hit. In the present study we first examined how important it is to do so. We did this by designing two interception tasks that promote different eye movements. In both tasks it was important to be accurate relative to both the moving target and the static environment. We found that performance was more variable in relation to the structure that was not fixated. This suggests that the resolution of visual information that is gathered during the movement is important for continuously improving predictions about critical aspects of the task, such as anticipating where the target will be at some time in the future. If so, variability in performance should increase if the target briefly disappears from view just before being hit, even if the target moves completely predictably. We demonstrate that it does, indicating that new visual information is used to improve precision throughout the movement.

[1]  B. Khurana,et al.  Space and Time in Perception and Action: Space–time and awareness , 2010 .

[2]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Hitting moving objects: is target speed used in guiding the hand? , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  H T Whiting,et al.  Exposure and occluded duration effects in a ball-catching skill. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Flexibility in intercepting moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[5]  P. Beek,et al.  Visuomotor transformation for interception: catching while fixating , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  E. Brenner,et al.  The difference between the perception of absolute and relative motion: a reaction time study , 1994, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Wann,et al.  How active gaze informs the hand in sequential pointing movements , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[9]  A Dubrowski,et al.  Target velocity effects on manual interception kinematics. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[10]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Target Interception: Hand–Eye Coordination and Strategies , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Anne C. Sittig,et al.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  P. McGeorge,et al.  Oppel – Kundt Illusion in Three-Dimensional Space , 2006, Perception.

[13]  J. Smeets,et al.  When is behavioral data evidence for a control theory? Tau-coupling revisited. , 2003, Motor control.

[14]  Apostolos P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Guiding contact by coupling the taus of gaps , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Luis Augusto Teixeira,et al.  Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Grasping Weber's law , 2008, Current Biology.

[17]  R. Gellman,et al.  Control strategies in directing the hand to moving targets , 1992, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  E Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving objects. The dependency of hand velocity on the speed of the target. , 2000, Experimental brain research.

[19]  A. Bahill,et al.  Why can't batters keep their eyes on the ball? , 1984 .

[20]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Intercepting moving objects: do eye-movements matter? , 2010 .

[21]  A. V. van Soest,et al.  Are fast interceptive actions continuously guided by vision? Revisiting Bootsma and van Wieringen (1990). , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Use of visual information in the correction of interceptive actions , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  J. Henriksson Human movement science , 2012, Acta physiologica.

[25]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  The coordination of eye, head, and hand movements in a natural task , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[27]  Klaus-Peter Hoffmann,et al.  Target selection in eye–hand coordination: Do we reach to where we look or do we look to where we reach? , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Welber Marinovic,et al.  The utilisation of visual information in the control of rapid interceptive actions. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[29]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Catching a gently thrown ball , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Extrapolation of visual motion for manual interception. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[33]  A. Kristofferson,et al.  The timing of interresponse intervals , 1973 .

[34]  Michael F. Land,et al.  From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Bruce Abernethy,et al.  Batting with occluded vision: an in situ examination of the information pick-up and interceptive skills of high- and low-skilled cricket batsmen. , 2006, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[36]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Sources of variability in interceptive movements , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Hitting moving targets: effects of target speed and dimensions on movement time , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  E. Brenner,et al.  The effect of expectations on hitting moving targets: influence of the preceding target's speed , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  Look-ahead fixations: anticipatory eye movements in natural tasks , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast corrections of movements with a computer mouse. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[42]  G. Orban,et al.  Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns , 1988, Vision Research.

[43]  H. Whiting,et al.  Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[44]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Is there a constancy for velocity? , 1989, Vision Research.

[45]  E. Brenner,et al.  Hitting moving targets Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target’s velocity , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  O. Braddick,et al.  The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals , 1991, Vision Research.

[47]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Prediction in the oculomotor system: smooth pursuit during transient disappearance of a visual target , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  E. Brenner,et al.  Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  The visual control of aimed hand movements to stationary and moving targets. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[50]  Mary M Hayhoe,et al.  Task and context determine where you look. , 2016, Journal of vision.