Liquidity management with fuzzy qualitative constraints

Abstract The treasurer of a bank must balance liquidity flows every day in an environment in which some future interest rates and transactions are known precisely, but some are uncertain. Decision support systems based on traditional mathematical programming approach find the optimal plan with respect to precise quantitative constraints provided by the user; we here suggest a procedure by which such systems can utilize probabilistic and Fuzzy qualitative constraints (e.g. “the treasury might have to cover a small deficit next Friday”). Each qualitative judgement is formalized by a discrete possibility distribution, which is converted to a discrete probability distribution; in this form the problem can be solved by the simple recourse method. Unexpected surpluses/deficits due to an uncertain future balance are evaluated in the objective function: by varying the evaluation coefficients along a scale from pessimistic to optimistic, we can obtain several solutions each adapted to a different risk policy.

[1]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Information Issues in Model Specification , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  E. Beale ON MINIMIZING A CONVEX FUNCTION SUBJECT TO LINEAR INEQUALITIES , 1955 .

[3]  R. Wets,et al.  STOCHASTIC PROGRAMS WITH RECOURSE , 1967 .

[4]  J. Kallberg,et al.  Comparison of Alternative Utility Functions in Portfolio Selection Problems , 1983 .

[5]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Qualitative-numeric simulation with Q3 , 1993 .

[6]  M. W. Merkhofer,et al.  Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Hennie Daniels,et al.  Application of constraint logic programming to asset and liability management in banks , 1991 .

[8]  Pascal Van Hentenryck Constraint satisfaction in logic programming , 1989, Logic programming.

[9]  William T. Ziemba Computational Algorithms for Convex Stochastic Programs with Simple Recourse , 1970, Oper. Res..

[10]  Serafín Moral Construction of a Probability Distribution from a Fuzzy Information , 1986 .

[11]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  On the usage of qualitative reasoning as an approach towards enterprise modelling , 1995, Ann. Oper. Res..

[12]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  A Theory of Interactions: Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Algebraic Reasoning , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[13]  D. Dubois,et al.  Unfair coins and necessity measures: Towards a possibilistic interpretation of histograms , 1983 .

[14]  Roger J.-B. Wets,et al.  Programming under uncertainty: The complete problem , 1966 .

[15]  Ronald R. Yager Fuzzy set and possibility theory : recent developments , 1982 .

[16]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Linear programming and extensions , 1965 .

[17]  Richard Power,et al.  SEPT: a hybrid intelligent support system for the bank treasury dealing room , 1991, Proceedings First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications on Wall Street.

[18]  Rafael M. Huber Artificial intelligence in scientific computation : towards second generation systems , 1989 .

[19]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .