A brain-controlled rehabilitation system with multiple kernel learning

Many diseases affect human movement functions and daily living. In order to recover the ability of movement, rehabilitation is the only way to improve the situation for many clients. Therefore, this study proposed a novel robot with brain-computer interface for rehabilitation exercises, namely BCRS (Brian-Controlled Rehabilitation System) and using multiple kernel learning (MKL) trains the classifier. BCRS detects and classifies the P300 and non-P300 signals from human brain and determines what kind of the rehabilitation exercises will be chosen. Three types of exercises, passive range of motion, isotonic, and isometric exercise, were realized in the system and support vector machine was used as the classification algorithm. For the three exercises, a new P300 panel was designed and composed of 25 commands. Through the experiments, we can find that BCRS can achieve good performance for rehabilitation exercises and MKL is a good method for EEG to have good accuracy of P300 signal classification and low training time than support vector machine (SVM).

[1]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[2]  S.K. Agrawal,et al.  Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) , 2009, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[3]  D. Lefeber,et al.  Design of a powered elbow orthosis for orthopaedic rehabilitation using compliant actuation , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[4]  Winifred Schultz-Krohn PhD Otr,et al.  Occupational Therapy: Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction , 2001 .

[5]  J. Wyndaele,et al.  Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[6]  A. Geurts,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Glenys French,et al.  WILLARD AND SPACKMAN'S OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY (10TH ED.) , 2004 .

[8]  Martin Buss,et al.  Compliant actuation of rehabilitation robots , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  M. Tomizuka,et al.  Control of Rotary Series Elastic Actuator for Ideal Force-Mode Actuation in Human–Robot Interaction Applications , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[10]  H. Kazerooni,et al.  Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[12]  Nobuyuki Matsui,et al.  Development of rehabilitation training support system of upper limb motor function for personalized rehabilitation , 2009, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[13]  Ling Li,et al.  Support Vector Machinery for Infinite Ensemble Learning , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[14]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Controlling the Apparent Inertia of Passive Human-Interactive , 2006 .

[15]  J. Furusho,et al.  Quasi-3-DOF Rehabilitation System for Upper Limbs: Its Force-Feedback Mechanism and Software for Rehabilitation , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[16]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Design and Characterization of Hand Module for Whole-Arm Rehabilitation Following Stroke , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[17]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Definition, Identification, and Reliability of Measurement of the P300 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential , 1987 .

[18]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Controlling the apparent inertia of passive human-interactive robots , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.