Measurement of Capillary Radius and Contact Angle within Porous Media.

The pore radius (i.e., capillary radius) and contact angle determine the capillary pressure generated in a porous medium. The most common method to determine these two parameters is through measurement of the capillary pressure generated by a reference liquid (i.e., a liquid with near-zero contact angle) and a test liquid. The rate of rise technique, commonly used to determine the capillary pressure, results in significant uncertainties. In this study, we utilize a recently developed technique for independently measuring the capillary pressure and permeability to determine the equivalent minimum capillary radii and contact angle of water within micropillar wick structures. In this method, the experimentally measured dryout threshold of a wick structure at different wicking lengths is fit to Darcy's law to extract the maximum capillary pressure generated by the test liquid. The equivalent minimum capillary radii of different wick geometries are determined by measuring the maximum capillary pressures generated using n-hexane as the working fluid. It is found that the equivalent minimum capillary radius is dependent on the diameter of pillars and the spacing between pillars. The equivalent capillary radii of micropillar wicks determined using the new method are found to be up to 7 times greater than the current geometry-based first-order estimates. The contact angle subtended by water at the walls of the micropillars is determined by measuring the capillary pressure generated by water within the arrays and the measured capillary radii for the different geometries. This mean contact angle of water is determined to be 54.7°.

[1]  N. Fries,et al.  An analytic solution of capillary rise restrained by gravity. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[2]  K. Goodson,et al.  Characterization of the wettability of thin nanostructured films in the presence of evaporation. , 2010, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[3]  E. B. Dussan,et al.  LIQUIDS ON SOLID SURFACES: STATIC AND DYNAMIC CONTACT LINES , 1979 .

[4]  E. Wang,et al.  Prediction and optimization of liquid propagation in micropillar arrays. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[5]  J. K. Spelt,et al.  Sessile-drop contact angle measurements using axisymmetric drop shape analysis , 1987 .

[6]  R. Bernstein,et al.  The Rate of Rise of Liquids in Fine Vertical Capillaries , 1951 .

[7]  H. Brinkman A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles , 1949 .

[8]  J M Bell,et al.  THE FLOW OF LIQUIDS THROUGH CAPILLARY SPACES , 1905 .

[9]  L. R. Fisher Measurement of small contact angles for sessile drops , 1979 .

[10]  E. W. Washburn The Dynamics of Capillary Flow , 1921 .

[11]  R. Bonnecaze,et al.  Optimization of capillary flow through square micropillar arrays , 2014 .

[12]  C. Meinhart,et al.  A Flat Heat Pipe Architecture Based on Nanostructured Titania , 2010, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[13]  Richard Lucas,et al.  Ueber das Zeitgesetz des kapillaren Aufstiegs von Flüssigkeiten , 1918 .

[14]  N. Fries,et al.  The effect of evaporation on the wicking of liquids into a metallic weave. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  D. R. Adkins,et al.  Procedures for measuring the properties of heat-pipe wick materials , 1993 .

[16]  W. Zisman,et al.  Oleophobic monolayers: I. Films adsorbed from solution in non-polar liquids☆ , 1946 .

[17]  S. Moghaddam,et al.  Monoporous micropillar wick structures, I-Mass transport characteristics , 2014 .

[18]  A. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Wetting of silicon wafers by n-alkanes , 2003 .

[19]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Automation of axisymmetric drop shape analysis for measurements of interfacial tensions and contact angles , 1990 .

[20]  A. Marmur,et al.  Direct determination of contact angles of model soils in comparison with wettability characterization by capillary rise. , 2010 .

[21]  Walliser,et al.  Capillary Rise for Thermodynamic Characterization of Solid Particle Surface , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[22]  R. Dawe,et al.  Determination of relative wettability of porous sandstones by imbibition studies , 1995 .

[23]  Stephen Whitaker,et al.  Momentum transfer at the boundary between a porous medium and a homogeneous fluid-I. Theoretical development , 1995 .

[24]  T. T. Chau A review of techniques for measurement of contact angles and their applicability on mineral surfaces , 2009 .

[25]  H. Jacobasch,et al.  Contact angle measurements and contact angle interpretation : 1. Contact angle measurements by axisymmetric drop shape analysis and a goniometer sessile drop technique , 1997 .

[26]  Andrea C. Santomaso,et al.  Wettability of mineral and metallic powders: Applicability and limitations of sessile drop method and Washburn's technique , 2012 .

[27]  H. Czachor Modelling the effect of pore structure and wetting angles on capillary rise in soils having different wettabilities , 2006 .

[28]  Saeed Moghaddam,et al.  Monoporous micropillar wick structures, II-optimization & theoretical limits , 2014 .

[29]  Nimisha Srivastava,et al.  A unified scaling model for flow through a lattice of microfabricated posts. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[30]  S. Moghaddam,et al.  A novel method for characterization of liquid transport through micro-wicking arrays , 2014 .

[31]  G. Buckton Assessment of the wettability of pharmaceutical powders , 1993 .

[32]  A Wilhelm Neumann,et al.  Determination of surface tension and contact angle from the shapes of axisymmetric fluid interfaces without use of apex coordinates. , 1983, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.