Preparation of biogenic gas vesicle nanostructures for use as contrast agents for ultrasound and MRI

Gas vesicles (GVs) are a unique class of gas-filled protein nanostructures that are detectable at subnanomolar concentrations and whose physical properties allow them to serve as highly sensitive imaging agents for ultrasound and MRI. Here we provide a protocol for isolating GVs from native and heterologous host organisms, functionalizing these nanostructures with moieties for targeting and fluorescence, characterizing their biophysical properties and imaging them using ultrasound and MRI. GVs can be isolated from natural cyanobacterial and haloarchaeal host organisms or from Escherichia coli expressing a heterologous GV gene cluster and purified using buoyancy-assisted techniques. They can then be modified by replacing surface-bound proteins with engineered, heterologously expressed variants or through chemical conjugation, resulting in altered mechanical, surface and targeting properties. Pressurized absorbance spectroscopy is used to characterize their mechanical properties, whereas dynamic light scattering (DLS)and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are used to determine nanoparticle size and morphology, respectively. GVs can then be imaged with ultrasound in vitro and in vivo using pulse sequences optimized for their detection versus background. They can also be imaged with hyperpolarized xenon MRI using chemical exchange saturation transfer between GV-bound and dissolved xenon—a technique currently implemented in vitro. Taking 3–8 d to prepare, these genetically encodable nanostructures enable multimodal, noninvasive biological imaging with high sensitivity and potential for molecular targeting.

[1]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[2]  M. Kunth,et al.  Continuous‐wave saturation considerations for efficient xenon depolarization , 2015, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  Melissa Yin,et al.  Acoustic Behavior of Halobacterium salinarum Gas Vesicles in the High-Frequency Range: Experiments and Modeling. , 2017, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  A. Walsby,et al.  The distribution of the outer gas vesicle protein, GvpC, on the Anabaena gas vesicle, and its ratio to GvpA. , 1993, Journal of general microbiology.

[5]  Mikhail G. Shapiro,et al.  Molecular Imaging in Synthetic Biology, and Synthetic Biology in Molecular Imaging , 2017, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[6]  M. Kunth,et al.  Hyperpolarized xenon for NMR and MRI applications. , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[7]  Mikhail G. Shapiro,et al.  Genetically encoded reporters for hyperpolarized xenon magnetic resonance imaging. , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[8]  R. Lauffer,et al.  Gadolinium(III) Chelates as MRI Contrast Agents: Structure, Dynamics, and Applications. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[9]  David Maresca,et al.  Nonlinear ultrasound imaging of nanoscale acoustic biomolecules. , 2017, Applied physics letters.

[10]  Leif Schr ¨ oder Chapter 8 HyperCEST Imaging , 2017 .

[11]  Jinwoo Cheon,et al.  Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging , 2007, Nature Medicine.

[12]  Jonathan R Lindner,et al.  Molecular imaging with targeted contrast ultrasound. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[13]  L. Schröder Xenon Biosensor HyperCEST MRI , 2017 .

[14]  P. Bachert,et al.  Analytical solution for the depolarization of hyperpolarized nuclei by chemical exchange saturation transfer between free and encapsulated xenon (HyperCEST). , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  Biogenic Gas Nanostructures as Ultrasonic Molecular Reporters , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[16]  A. Walsby,et al.  Gas vesicles , 1994, Microbiological reviews.

[17]  F. Pfeifer,et al.  Distribution, formation and regulation of gas vesicles , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[18]  David Maresca,et al.  Molecular Engineering of Acoustic Protein Nanostructures. , 2016, ACS nano.

[19]  M. Kunth,et al.  Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer with hyperpolarized nuclei (qHyper-CEST): sensing xenon-host exchange dynamics and binding affinities by NMR. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  R. Smith,et al.  Growth and gas-vacuole development in vegetative cells of Anabaena flos-aquae , 1967, Archiv für Mikrobiologie.

[21]  Ning Li,et al.  Gas Vesicle Genes Identified in Bacillus megaterium and Functional Expression in Escherichia coli , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  Matthew S Rosen,et al.  Near-unity nuclear polarization with an open-source 129Xe hyperpolarizer for NMR and MRI , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  B. Zakeri,et al.  Peptide tag forming a rapid covalent bond to a protein, through engineering a bacterial adhesin , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  R. Simon Morphology and Protein Composition of Gas Vesicles from Wild Type and Gas Vacuole Defective Strains of Halobacterium salinarium Strain 5 , 1981 .

[25]  M. Albert,et al.  In vivo detection of cucurbit[6]uril, a hyperpolarized xenon contrast agent for a xenon magnetic resonance imaging biosensor , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[26]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: characterization of a new class of contrast agents for MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[27]  Mikhail G. Shapiro,et al.  NMR Hyperpolarization Techniques of Gases. , 2017, Chemistry.

[28]  M. Kunth,et al.  Observing and preventing rubidium runaway in a direct-infusion xenon-spin hyperpolarizer optimized for high-resolution hyper-CEST (chemical exchange saturation transfer using hyperpolarized nuclei) NMR. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.