The Variation of Pre-movement Time in Building Evacuation

In order to provide a reliable evacuation design assessment, data showing the variation in pre-movement time is of vital importance. The pre-movement time is in many cases regarded as the main time period during an evacuation assessment. Therefore, forty unannounced evacuation experiments for six different occupancies were analysed to quantify pre-movement time during building evacuation, i.e., the time taken between receiving the first cue and initiation of movement towards an exit during evacuation. The occupancies were office, cinema theatres, restaurants, department stores and night clubs. The occupancies were equipped with different types of evacuation alarm systems. The study resulted in 2486 data points for the pre-movement time. The pre-movement times were matched to statistical distributions to describe the variation. It was found that the pre-movement times in most cases could be represented with a lognormal or loglogistic distribution typically having a rapid initial increase representing the phase when people start reacting, which is followed by a less steep decrease representing the phase when some people linger before evacuating. Most reliable data are provided for the cinema theatre experiments which included 1954 data points from 30 experiments. The paper also presents a structure for performing an assessment of video recorded evacuation experiment determining actions, relevant time data and fitting a statistical distribution to the data. The new information provided in the paper can help fire safety professionals to more accurately predict the time to evacuate different premises.

[1]  Weiguo Song,et al.  Experiment and multi-grid modeling of evacuation from a classroom , 2008 .

[2]  Guylène Proulx.  Evacuation time and movement in apartment buildings , 1995 .

[3]  J. Ghosh,et al.  AIC, BIC and Recent Advances in Model Selection , 2011 .

[4]  Anders Sandberg,et al.  Unannounced evacuation of large retail-stores - An evaluation of human behaviour and the computer model Simulex , 1997 .

[5]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Evacuation response behaviour of occupants in a large theatre during a live performance , 2017 .

[6]  David V. Canter,et al.  The decision to evacuate: a study of the motivations which contribute to evacuation in the event of fire , 1985 .

[7]  D. A Purser,et al.  Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations , 2001 .

[8]  Malcolm R. Forster,et al.  Aic Scores as Evidence: A Bayesian Interpretation , 2011 .

[9]  Daniel Nilsson.  Utformning av talade utrymningsmeddelanden - erfarenheter från en enkätundersökning och oannonserade utrymningsförsök , 2006 .

[10]  G. Proulx,et al.  To Prevent 'Panic' In An Underground Emergency: Why Not Tell People The Truth? , 1991 .

[11]  G. Proulx,et al.  The Time Delay To Start Evacuation: Review Of Five Case Studies , 1997 .

[12]  John D. Norton,et al.  Challenges to Bayesian Confirmation Theory , 2011 .

[13]  Frank Biess.  The Concept of Panic , 2014 .

[14]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  Predicting Human Behavior During Fires , 2013 .

[15]  J. Sime.  Movement toward the Familiar , 1985 .

[16]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Social influence during the initial phase of a fire evacuation—Analysis of evacuation experiments in a cinema theatre , 2009 .

[17]  Guylène Proulx,et al.  Playing with fire : understanding human behavior in burning buildings , 2003 .

[18]  Karen Boyce,et al.  A study of evacuation from large retail stores , 2000 .

[19]  J. D Sime,et al.  An occupant response shelter escape time (ORSET) model , 2001 .

[20]  Marco D’Orazio,et al.  An Experimental Study on the Correlation Between “Attachment to Belongings” “Pre-movement” Time , 2014 .