What Is the True Value of Dynamic TDD: A MAC Layer Perspective

Small cell networks (SCNs) are envisioned to embrace dynamic time division duplexing (TDD) in order to tailor downlink (DL)/uplink (UL) subframe resources to quick variations and burstiness of DL/UL traffic. The study of dynamic TDD is particularly important because it provides valuable insights on the full duplex transmission technology, which has been identified as one of the candidate technologies for the 5th-generation (5G) networks. Up to now, the existing works on dynamic TDD have shown that the UL of dynamic TDD suffers from severe performance degradation due to the strong DL-to-UL interference in the physical (PHY) layer. This conclusion raises a fundamental question: Despite such obvious technology disadvantage, what is the true value of dynamic TDD? In this paper, we answer this question from a media access control (MAC) layer viewpoint and present analytical results on the DL/UL time resource utilization (TRU) of synchronous dynamic TDD, which has been widely adopted in the existing 4th-generation (4G) systems. Our analytical results shed new light on the dynamic TDD in future synchronous 5G networks.

[1]  Matthias Wildemeersch,et al.  D2D Enhanced Heterogeneous Cellular Networks With Dynamic TDD , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Zihuai Lin,et al.  Study on the Idle Mode Capability with LoS and NLoS Transmissions , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[3]  Holger Claussen,et al.  Towards 1 Gbps/UE in Cellular Systems: Understanding Ultra-Dense Small Cell Deployments , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[5]  Kaibin Huang,et al.  Coverage and Economy of Cellular Networks with Many Base Stations , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[6]  Nicola Marchetti,et al.  Throughput and coverage for a mixed full and half duplex small cell network , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[7]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  On Dynamic Time-Division-Duplex Transmissions for Small-Cell Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[8]  Peng Wang,et al.  Performance Impact of LoS and NLoS Transmissions in Dense Cellular Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Zihuai Lin,et al.  Performance Impact of Idle Mode Capability on Dense Small Cell Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Kerstin Vogler,et al.  Table Of Integrals Series And Products , 2016 .

[11]  Zukang Shen,et al.  Dynamic uplink-downlink configuration and interference management in TD-LTE , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Analysis on the SINR performance of dynamic TDD in homogeneous small cell networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[13]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Rate analysis and feasibility of dynamic TDD in 5G cellular systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[14]  Guoqiang Mao,et al.  A New Capacity Scaling Law in Ultra-Dense Networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[15]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Small cell dynamic TDD transmissions in heterogeneous networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[16]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  5G Ultra-Dense Cellular Networks , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[17]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Dynamic TDD transmissions in homogeneous small cell networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[18]  Zihuai Lin,et al.  Ultra-Dense Networks: Is There a Limit to Spatial Spectrum Reuse? , 2017, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[19]  Liuqing Yang,et al.  Dynamic TDD Support in Macrocell-Assisted Small Cell Architecture , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.