Learning to see faces and objects

[1]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[2]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[4]  J. Tanaka.  The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man and machines , 2001 .

[6]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[7]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Farah,et al.  EARLY COMMITMENT OF NEURAL SUBSTRATES FOR FACE RECOGNITION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[11]  M. Tarr,et al.  DOES VISUAL SUBORDINATE-LEVEL CATEGORISATION ENGAGE THE FUNCTIONALLY DEFINED FUSIFORM FACE AREA? , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[12]  W. Hayward,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence and Object Discriminability , 2000, Psychological science.

[13]  P. Bennett,et al.  Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers , 1999, Vision Research.

[14]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Color diagnosticity in object recognition , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[18]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[21]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.

[22]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.

[23]  P. Mcmullen,et al.  Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Martin Arguin,et al.  The Interaction of Object Form and Object M eaning in the Identification Performance of a Patient with Category-specific Visual Agnosia , 1997 .

[25]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Tarr,et al.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Current Biology.

[28]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[30]  I. Biederman,et al.  Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .

[31]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M. Tarr,et al.  To What Extent Do Unique Parts Influence Recognition Across Changes in Viewpoint? , 1995 .

[33]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  FORMS: A flexible object recognition and modelling system , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[34]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Class similarity and viewpoint invariance in the recognition of 3D objects , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[38]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representing three-dimensional objects by sets of activities of receptive fields , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Perception.

[41]  M. Farah.  Is an Object an Object an Object? Cognitive and Neuropsychological Investigations of Domain Specificity in Visual Object Recognition , 1992 .

[42]  P. Green.  Biology and Cognitive Development: the Case of Face Recognition, Mark H. Johnson, John Morton. Blackwell, Oxford (1991), x, +180. Price £35.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1992 .

[43]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  S. Carey.  Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Identification of Disoriented Objects: A Dual‐systems Theory , 1990 .

[47]  M. Farah.  Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision , 1990 .

[48]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[49]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[51]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[53]  P. Jolicoeur.  The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[54]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The Shape of Smooth Objects and the Way Contours End , 1982, Perception.

[56]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[57]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[59]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[60]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  D. Mumford.  On the computational architecture of the neocortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[62]  S. Pinker.  The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature , 2002 .

[63]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representation and recognition in vision , 1999 .

[64]  M. Tarr.  Visual Object Recognition: Can A Single Mechanism Suffice? , 1998 .

[65]  G W Humphreys,et al.  View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Visual object recognition. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[67]  S. Pinker.  The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[68]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  Richard G. Kurial,et al.  Representation and recognition , 1990 .

[70]  Kevin M. McConkey,et al.  Cognition in individual and social contexts , 1989 .

[71]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[72]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[73]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[74]  F. Attneave,et al.  The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory , 1949 .