Haplotype reference consortium panel: Practical implications of imputations with large reference panels

Recently, the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) released a large imputation panel that allows more accurate imputation of genetic variants. In this study, we compared a set of directly assayed common and rare variants from an exome array to imputed genotypes, that is, 1000 genomes project (1000GP) and HRC. We showed that imputation using the HRC panel improved the concordance between assayed and imputed genotypes at common, and especially, low‐frequency variants. Furthermore, we performed a genome‐wide association meta‐analysis of vertical cup‐disc ratio, a highly heritable endophenotype of glaucoma, in four cohorts using 1000GP and HRC imputations. We compared the results of the meta‐analysis using 1000GP to the meta‐analysis results using HRC. Overall, we found that using HRC imputation significantly improved P values (P = 3.07 × 10−61), particularly for suggestive variants. Both meta‐analyses were performed in the same sample size, yet we found eight genome‐wide significant loci in the HRC‐based meta‐analysis versus seven genome‐wide significant loci in the 1000GP‐based meta‐analysis. This study provides supporting evidence of the new avenues for gene discovery and fine mapping that the HRC imputation panel offers.

[1]  J. Landolin,et al.  Assembling Large Genomes with Single-Molecule Sequencing and Locality Sensitive Hashing , 2014 .

[2]  Adriana I. Iglesias,et al.  New insights into the genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma based on meta-analyses of intraocular pressure and optic disc characteristics , 2017, Human molecular genetics.

[3]  J. Marchini,et al.  Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Progress and promise in understanding the genetic basis of common diseases , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Eric E Schadt,et al.  Accuracy of Genome-wide Imputation of Untyped Markers and Impacts on Statistical Power for Association Studies , 2009 .

[6]  Alan M. Kwong,et al.  A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[7]  B. Browning,et al.  A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  Evan E. Eichler,et al.  Genetic variation and the de novo assembly of human genomes , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  Gabor T. Marth,et al.  A global reference for human genetic variation , 2015, Nature.

[10]  Pieter B. T. Neerincx,et al.  The Genome of the Netherlands: design, and project goals , 2013, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[11]  Life Technologies,et al.  A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing , 2011 .

[12]  C. V. van Duijn,et al.  The Effect of Genetic Drift in a Young Genetically Isolated Population , 2005 .

[13]  P. Visscher,et al.  Title: Across-cohort Qc Analyses of Genome-wide Association Study Summary Statistics from Complex Traits Wray 1 , the Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits (giant) Consortium , 2015 .

[14]  Adriana I. Iglesias,et al.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies novel loci that influence cupping and the glaucomatous process , 2014, Nature Communications.

[15]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  G. Abecasis,et al.  Genotype imputation. , 2009, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[17]  Mathijs,et al.  3 Population-specific genotype imputations using minimac or IMPUTE 2 , 2018 .

[18]  Yurii S. Aulchenko,et al.  ProbABEL package for genome-wide association analysis of imputed data , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[19]  Yurii S. Aulchenko,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108 Genetics and population analysis GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis , 2022 .

[20]  Blue Mountains Eye Study-GWAS groupw,et al.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies novel loci that influence cupping and the glaucomatous process , 2014 .

[21]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes , 2012, Nature.

[22]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease , 2016 .

[23]  Cornelia M van Duijn,et al.  The effect of genetic drift in a young genetically isolated population. , 2005, Annals of human genetics.

[24]  Yun Li,et al.  METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans , 2010, Bioinform..

[25]  L. Cardon,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium in young genetically isolated Dutch population , 2004, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[26]  Alan M. Kwong,et al.  Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Best Practices and Joint Calling of the HumanExome BeadChip: The CHARGE Consortium , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  J. Blangero,et al.  The path to open-angle glaucoma gene discovery: endophenotypic status of intraocular pressure, cup-to-disc ratio, and central corneal thickness. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  D. Altshuler,et al.  A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing , 2010, Nature.

[30]  Heorhiy Byelas,et al.  Improved imputation quality of low-frequency and rare variants in European samples using the ‘Genome of The Netherlands' , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[31]  Zoltán Kutalik,et al.  Quality control and conduct of genome-wide association meta-analyses , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[32]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  Improved imputation of low-frequency and rare variants using the UK10K haplotype reference panel , 2015, Nature Communications.

[33]  Pieter B. T. Neerincx,et al.  Supplementary Information Whole-genome sequence variation , population structure and demographic history of the Dutch population , 2022 .