A critical appraisal of the international factors in “One Country, Two Systems” and democratization in Hong Kong

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present an analytical framework to examine the impact of international factors on “One Country, Two Systems” in general and Hong Kong’s democratization in particular. Design/methodology/approach The paper has adopted a behavioral approach to identify the agents, mechanisms and observable facets of external–internal interactions. Findings The need for international recognition on the performance of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) under Chinese sovereignty has provided external actors with the necessary leverage. Though the impact of the international community has been indirect and limited, the authors have identified two mechanisms – lesson drawing and socialization – whereby the impact of international actors and their actions towards Hong Kong may be subtly felt. Moreover, there are at least three observable facets of external actions which are pertinent to the democracy issue. At the end of day, the external impacts will be determined not by the international actors per se but the balance of power between the domestic actors in Hong Kong. Originality/value There is a scholarly consensus that international factors matter to Hong Kong. But there has been a lack of serious investigation as to why and how they matter. The observable facets of external–internal interactions and the mechanisms identified in this work have not only enriched our understanding of the relevance of external factors in Hong Kong affairs, but also provided a sound foundation for future research.

[1]  Chung Fun Steven Hung The Professional Teachers' Union as an interest group fighting for democracy , 2018 .

[2]  Arch Puddington,et al.  The Freedom House Survey for 2016: The Dual Threat of Populists and Autocrats , 2017 .

[3]  K. Wong,et al.  The Impact of Cross-border Integration with Mainland China on Hong Kong's Local Politics: The Individual Visit Scheme as a Double-edged Sword for Political Trust in Hong Kong , 2016, The China Quarterly.

[4]  G. Pike,et al.  Global Citizenship Education: Challenges and Possibilities , 2010 .

[5]  Hans Schattle Global Citizenship in Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[6]  J. Myers ‘To benefit the world by whatever means possible’: Adolescents' constructed meanings for global citizenship , 2010 .

[7]  S. Lo The Dynamics of Beijing-Hong Kong Relations: A Model for Taiwan? , 2008 .

[8]  S. Levitsky,et al.  International Linkage and Democratization , 2005 .

[9]  Alastair Iain Johnston,et al.  Treating International Institutions as Social Environments , 2001 .

[10]  Geoffrey Pridham The Dynamics of Democratization: A Comparative Approach , 2001 .

[11]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy‐Making , 2000 .

[12]  T. Risse,et al.  The Power of Human Rights: The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction , 1999 .

[13]  Richard Rose,et al.  Lesson-drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space , 1993 .