RoPax Ship Collision – a Methodology for Survivability Analysis

Throughout the world, ships are continuously being declared as total losses and 10 to 15% of these accidents are collisions between ships. The consequences of a collision are diverse and depend on the ship type, e.g. oil outflow in the case of damaged tankers or loss of stability in damaged passenger ships. This thesis focuses on RoPax ships, which in damaged conditions are related to high risk due to the large number of persons on-board. The main objective of the work is to contribute to RoPax shipping’s further development of sustainable transport and maritime safety. The work contributes to knowledge and understanding of in what conditions a RoPax ship damaged in a collision will survive without capsizing and how these can be simulated accurately using numerical models. In order to determine the consequences of the survivability of a RoPax ship struck in collision from the shape and size of the damage opening in its side-shell, a computational methodology is presented. It is sequential (de-coupled) and incorporates a non-linear finite element (FE) analysis of a collision, followed by dynamic damage stability simulations due to flooding. By means of this approach the conditions for the survivability of a ship struck in a collision, which for a RoPax ship is the time to capsize, can be assessed. The influence of variations in input parameters to the computational methodology is studied. Uncertainties of parameters in the FE analyses include dispersion in material parameters, material failure criterion and its representation, model representation of the striking bow section, friction coefficient, collision angle and ship speed. The influence of these parameters on the shape and size of the damage opening area and time to capsize of the struck RoPax ship is assessed. Recommendations for a sufficient level of simplifications in the models and analyses for arriving at reliable results in a numerical simulation of ship collisions are made. A significant part of the thesis is dedicated to the model uncertainty that relates to a possible (user-related) insecurity in the selection of criterion for material damage and rupture in ship collision simulations using non-linear explicit FE analyses. Several criteria are compared, such as the Shear, FLD and FLSD criteria, and assessed by comparison between experiments and numerical analyses. Tensile tests are used to study the dependence on a length scale of the fracture of the material. A relationship similar to Barba’s law was established which relates the fracture strain of the material to the length scale (element size) in the FE analysis. Forming limit tests are used to study the dependence on a multiaxial strain state. A small-scale ship-like structure subjected to impact loading is used as a reference structure in the assessment of the criteria. Results from FE simulations are compared to and validated using experimental results and recommendations for procedures for a numerical analysis of collision simulations are presented. Conceptual crashworthy side-shell structures that follow either the ductility or the strength design principles are assessed with a conventional reference structure. The assessment is made by comparing the intrusion depth before rupture of the inner side-shell of a double-hull structure occurs, energy absorption during the indentation, the final damage opening area as well as the weight and manufacturing costs of each structure. The results provide a basis for the discussion of the potential and challenges related to the implementation of each structure.

[1]  Shengming Zhang,et al.  On Impact Mechanics in Ship Collisions , 1998 .

[2]  Kristjan Tabri.  Influence of coupling in the prediction of ship collision damage , 2012 .

[3]  Preben Terndrup Pedersen,et al.  The Mechanics of Ship Collisions , 1999 .

[4]  Z. Marciniak,et al.  The mechanics of sheet metal forming , 1992 .

[5]  Quan Situ,et al.  Determination of forming limit diagrams of sheet materials with a hybrid experimental–numerical approach , 2011 .

[6]  V. Rubino,et al.  The collapse response of sandwich beams with a Y-frame core subjected to distributed and local loading , 2008 .

[7]  Jani Romanoff,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation on the collision resistance of the X-core structure , 2012 .

[8]  Jonas W. Ringsberg,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of bulb impact with a ship side-shell structure , 2009 .

[9]  Odd Sture Hopperstad,et al.  On the resistance to penetration of stiffened plates, Part II: Numerical analysis , 2009 .

[10]  Jerzy Matusiak,et al.  Analytical modelling of ship collision based on full-scale experiments , 2009 .

[11]  Martin J. Petersen.  Dynamics of ship collisions , 1982 .

[12]  C. Soares,et al.  Influence of environmental factors on corrosion of ship structures in marine atmosphere , 2009 .

[13]  Dracos Vassalos,et al.  Progressive structural failure and residual strength of damaged ships , 2011 .

[14]  M. Lützen.  Ship collision damage , 2002 .

[15]  Katsuyuki Suzuki,et al.  A comparative study of numerical simulations for fluid–structure interaction of liquid-filled tank during ship collision , 2007 .

[16]  Alan Klanac,et al.  Qualitative design assessment of crashworthy structures , 2005 .

[17]  Alan Brown,et al.  Collision Scenarios and Probabilistic Collision Damage , 2002 .

[18]  Dracos Vassalos,et al.  Risk-Based Ship Design , 2009 .

[19]  A. Pineau,et al.  Mechanical Behaviour of Materials , 2013 .

[20]  Bernt J. Leira,et al.  Analytical and numerical modelling of oil spill from a side tank with collision damage , 2012 .

[21]  Hagbart S. Alsos,et al.  Simulating the collision response of ship side structures: A failure criteria benchmark study , 2008 .

[22]  Hoon Huh,et al.  Forming limit diagram of auto-body steel sheets for high-speed sheet metal forming , 2011 .

[23]  Mohammad T. Tavakoli.  Assessment of oil spill in ship collision and grounding , 2011 .

[24]  Martin Schreuder,et al.  Time Simulation of the Behaviour of Damaged Ships in Waves , 2005 .

[25]  Jonas W. Ringsberg,et al.  What can we learn from uncertainty analysis with respect to survivability or time to capsize of a ship struck in collision , 2011 .

[26]  Alan Caruba,et al.  THE SOCIETY OF NAVAL ARCHITECTS AND MARINE ENGINEERS. , 1978 .

[27]  Jerzy Matusiak,et al.  Sloshing interaction in ship collisions—An experimental and numerical study , 2009 .

[28]  A Glykas,et al.  Energy conservation during a tanker collision , 2001 .

[29]  Jörg Peschmann,et al.  Energy absorption by the steel structure of ships in the event of collisions , 2002 .

[30]  C J Parker.  HERALD OF FREE ENTERPRISE , 1987 .

[31]  Hagbart Skage Alsos,et al.  Ship Grounding : Analysis of Ductile Fracture, Bottom Damage and Hull Girder Response , 2008 .

[32]  Thomas B. Stoughton,et al.  Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD , 2004 .

[33]  Hisayoshi Endo,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on the collapse strength of the bulbous bow structure in oblique collision , 2008 .

[34]  Sören Ehlers.  Material relation to assess the crashworthiness of ship structures , 2009 .

[35]  Luen Chow Chan,et al.  Prediction of forming limit diagrams based on shear failure criterion , 2010 .

[36]  Jørgen Amdahl,et al.  Integrated numerical analysis of an iceberg collision with a foreship structure , 2011 .

[37]  Preben Terndrup Pedersen,et al.  Numerical Study on the Effect of Buffer Bow Structure in Ship-to-ship Collisions , 2005 .

[38]  P. T. Pedersen,et al.  Collision and Grounding , 2006 .

[39]  Ulf B. Karlsson.  Improved collision safety of ships by an intrusion-tolerant inner side shell , 2009 .

[40]  J K Paik,et al.  Ultimate strength of ageing ships , 2002 .

[41]  Knut O. Ronold,et al.  New DNV Recommended Practice DNV-RP-C205 On Environmental Conditions And Environmental Loads , 2006 .

[42]  Yujie Li,et al.  On the global ship hull bending energy in ship collisions , 2004 .

[43]  P. Terndrup Pedersen.  Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures , 2010 .

[44]  Timothy J. Foecke,et al.  Metallurgical Analysis of Wrought Iron From the RMS Titanic , 2003 .

[45]  Dracos Vassalos,et al.  Time-Based Survival Criteria for Passenger Ro-Ro Vessels , 2003 .

[46]  Sidney Addelman,et al.  trans-Dimethanolbis(1,1,1-trifluoro-5,5-dimethylhexane-2,4-dionato)zinc(II) , 2008, Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online.

[47]  Yoshitaka Ogawa,et al.  Study on the residual ultimate longitudinal strength of hull girder of a bulk carrier against a sagging moment after ship collision , 2011 .

[48]  Lloyd's Register-Fairplay,et al.  World casualty statistics , 2008 .

[49]  Preben Terndrup Pedersen,et al.  Collision Risk and Damage after Collision , 1996 .

[50]  J. K. Paik.  Practical techniques for finite element modeling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (Part I: Theory) , 2007 .

[51]  Jørgen Amdahl,et al.  Analytical and numerical analysis of sheet metal instability using a stress based criterion , 2008 .

[52]  Dracos Vassalos,et al.  Study on side structure resistance to ship-ship collisions , 2007 .