Assessing engineering students' abilities to resolve ethical dilemmas

ABET's accreditation criteria provides additional impetus for preparing engineering graduates to act in an ethically responsible manner. However, methods to assess the effectiveness of educational efforts to do this remain primitive at best. We describe the first phase of a joint study at the University of Pittsburgh and the Colorado School of Mines to develop a measurement tool for assessing students' abilities to recognize and resolve ethical dilemmas. Pre- and post-tests at the beginning and end of a semester-long course focusing on engineering ethics are used to assess students' comprehension, analysis, and resolution of ethical dilemmas. Each test consists of two ethical dilemmas addressed through a response essay that is then holistically scored using a rubric that classifies students' level of achievement. Results are analyzed using statistical methods to determine if any "shifts " have occurred to indicate a significant positive change in the cohort's collective ability. A second phase will involve the development of a web-based assessment instrument similar to CSM's Cogito/sup /spl copy// that can be easily used by engineering faculty.

[1]  Michael J. Rabins,et al.  Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases , 1999 .

[2]  Michael Pritchard.  Beyond Disaster Ethics , 1990 .

[3]  Charles B. Fleddermann.  Engineering ethics cases for electrical and computer engineering students , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[4]  Michael S. Pritchard,et al.  Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When? , 1996 .

[5]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities , 1992 .

[6]  Kevin W. Bowyer.  Ethics and Computing: Living Responsibly in a Computerized World , 1995 .

[7]  Sarah K. A. Pfatteicher,et al.  Teaching vs. Preaching: EC2000 and the Engineering Ethics Dilemma , 2001 .

[8]  W. Popham.  What's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics. , 1997 .

[9]  Larry J. Shuman,et al.  Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule, and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle , 1997 .

[10]  Karl D. Stephan,et al.  A Survey of Ethics‐Related Instruction in U.S. Engineering Programs , 1999 .

[11]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  Measuring the intellectual development of students using intelligent assessment software , 2000, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135).

[12]  Caroline Whitbeck.  Problems and Cases: New Directions in Ethics 1980-1996 , 1996 .

[13]  Joseph R. Herkert.  Social, ethical, and policy implications of engineering : selected readings , 1999 .

[14]  Indira Nair,et al.  Decision Making in the Engineering Classroom , 1997 .

[15]  Caroline Whitbeck.  Integrating Ethics Teaching into Courses in Engineering Design. , 1987 .

[16]  K. M. Passino.  Teaching professional and ethical aspects of electrical engineering to a large class , 1998 .

[17]  R. Devon.  Towards a Social Ethics of Engineering: The Norms of Engagement , 1999 .

[18]  Kenneth A. Heischmidt,et al.  When Philosophy and Business Professors Talk: Assessment of Ethical Reasoning in a Cross Disciplinary Business Ethics Course , 1997 .

[19]  Joseph R. Herkert,et al.  ABET's Engineering Criteria 2000 and Engineering Ethics: Where Do We Go From Here? , 1999 .