Axisymmetric magnetic control in ITER

In magnetically confined fusion plasmas, feedback control of plasma parameters is assuming an increasingly important role. The complexity of the phenomena that occur in the plasmas and the limited number of actuators available require the implementation of sophisticated control systems to achieve adequate quality of plasma confinement. The range of requirements is wide and the relevant timescales can range from a few to hundreds of milliseconds. In addition, the high degree of coupling between control parameters increases the level of complexity that the control systems have to address. In this respect, the ITER device, which is under construction and will be the world's largest magnetic fusion experiment, doesn't differ conceptually from a range of smaller scale experiments currently in operation across the world. Nevertheless, limited operational space, together with more demanding requirements in machine protection, implies more restrictive constraints for the control systems. One area of particular importance is that of axisymmetric magnetic control of the plasma. ITER will produce D-shaped toroidal plasma with a "tokamak" configuration in which the hot plasma will be confined and controlled using magnetic fields generated by a set of superconducting coils that surround the vacuum chamber. Although magnetic control is well understood and well developed, being the basic control required for operation of a tokamak, in the case of ITER, new constraints need to be taken into account in the control strategies: long response times due to the thick metal shell of the vacuum vessel, achieving an acceptable level of magnetic noise, that can compromise the quality of control, and establishing an acceptable range of controllability are some of the key issues that need to be addressed. Axisymmetric magnetic control encompasses primarily control of the plasma shape and position. Two controllers are usually envisioned for this purpose: the controller responsible for Plasma Current, Position and Shape and the controller stabilizing plasma vertical displacements which are unstable for plasmas that have an elongated poloidal cross section (Vertical Stabilization, VS). The dynamics of the two control systems differ by almost an order of magnitude in timescale, but the two share some of the magnetic actuators. Additional constraints on the control capability are associated with the quality of the diagnostic data available for the control. Sensitivity of the measurements to the 3D non-axisymmetric components of the magnetic fields, the noise level in the feedback loops and real-time constraints in the parameter estimation would increase complexity in the plasma axisymmetric magnetic control. This paper will illustrate the present status of development of the magnetic control system for ITER and identify the major outstanding issues. Some possible solutions will be presented together with open questions under investigation.

[1]  B. B. Carvalho,et al.  A Real-Time Architecture for the Identification of Faulty Magnetic Sensors in the JET Tokamak , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[2]  P. J. Lomas,et al.  A real-time architecture for the identification of faulty magnetic sensors in the JET tokamak , 2012, 2012 18th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Conference.

[3]  Allen H. Boozer,et al.  Theory of tokamak disruptionsa) , 2012 .

[4]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  On dynamic input allocation for set-point regulation of the JET tokamak plasma shape , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA).

[5]  Alfredo Portone,et al.  ITER non-axisymmetric error fields induced by its magnet system , 2011 .

[6]  E. Daly,et al.  Integration of the ITER in Vessel Coil System , 2011 .

[7]  P. J. Lomas,et al.  Control of Elongated Plasma in Presence of ELMs in the JET Tokamak , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic allocator for optimal input/output performance trade-off: Application to the JET tokamak shape controller , 2011, Autom..

[9]  Gianmaria De Tommasi,et al.  Plasma Vertical Stabilization in the ITER Tokamak via Constrained Static Output Feedback , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[10]  Fabio Villone,et al.  Effects of thick blanket modules on the resistive wall modes stability in ITER , 2010 .

[11]  T. Osborne,et al.  L–H transition studies on DIII-D to determine H-mode access for operational scenarios in ITER , 2010 .

[12]  Filippo Sartori,et al.  The PCU JET Plasma Vertical Stabilization control system , 2010 .

[13]  Neil Mitchell,et al.  Overview of the ITER Correction Coils Design , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[14]  E. Alessi,et al.  The Magnetic Diagnostic Set for ITER , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[15]  M. Walker,et al.  Model-Based Design for Operational Plasma Shape Control in DIII-D , 2007 .

[16]  K. Ikeda Progress in the ITER Physics Basis , 2007 .

[17]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Antiwindup scheme for plasma shape control with rate and magnitude actuation constraints in the DIII-D tokamak , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[18]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Edge localized mode physics and operational aspects in tokamaks , 2003 .

[19]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  A new shape controller for extremely shaped plasmas in JET , 2003 .

[20]  A. A. Kavin,et al.  Derivation of the linear models for the analysis of the plasma current, position and shape control system in Tokamak devices , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Workshop on Workload Characterization (IEEE Cat. No.03EX775).

[21]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Real time equilibrium reconstruction for tokamak discharge control , 1998 .

[22]  R. R. Khayrutdinov,et al.  Studies of plasma equilibrium and transport in a Tokamak fusion device with the inverse-variable technique , 1993 .

[23]  K. Kurihara,et al.  Tokamak plasma shape identification on the basis of boundary integral equations , 1993 .

[24]  J. Lingertat,et al.  Local expansion method for fast plasma boundary identification in JET , 1993 .