THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF LICENTIATE OF ENGINEERING Intellectual Property Strategies and Innovation Causes and Consequences for Firms and Nations

New and useful ideas and knowledge, commonly denoted innovations after coming into use, are of decisive importance for economic growth and welfare. To promote the generation and diffusion of innovations, most, if not all, industrialized and industrializing societies rely on some form of an intellectual property rights (IPRs) system. As technological diversification, technological convergence, and open innovation become increasingly important, proper management of and strategies for IPRs and intellectual property (IP) becomes ever more central for the competitiveness of firms and nations. The general purpose of this thesis it to explore and explain the causes and consequences of IP strategies and policies at firm, national, and international levels in different industrial contexts with different types and degrees of openness in innovation. With focus on technological innovations and technology-related IP, various methods are employed to fulfill the purpose. The results show that, due to IP policy developments at national and international level, large firms have increasingly developed various IP strategies, especially patent strategies, to appropriate returns from innovations. As an example, large firms were found to in a first step increase their patenting (in terms of quantity), and in a second step focus more on selective and quality-oriented patenting in which the IP-related work is also internationalized. This internationalization of IP heavily impacts the patent offices and IP policies, especially in small countries where the national patenting tend to decrease as a result. Small firms on the other hand cannot gain the same benefits as large firms from an IPR system, especially from the patent system as currently designed, since they do not have enough resources for monitoring and enforcing their rights, which in turn limits the protective function of patents. Instead, small firms use patents to attract customers and investors. Patents then provide a governance mechanism for early stage financing of innovations. A new measure based on statistics at the national level indicates that the preferred markets for patenting from firms and inventors in various countries become increasingly similar. In addition, there is a convergence of national legal IPR systems around the world. Developing and industrializing nations in this convergence process typically switch from a weak to a strong IP regime in their national innovation systems, at a point in time when the mainly innovative benefits of a strong regime outweigh the mainly imitative benefits of a weak regime for the nation and its firms. A similar switch from a weak to a strong IP regime can be seen in various innovation systems, e.g. in mobile telecommunications. The openness of innovation in such a corporate innovation system is closely related to the IP strategies of the involved firms, and the results show that the openness in a system is directly and strongly affected by changes in the IP strategies of its firms. The thesis shows the importance of the interaction between IP strategies of large and small firms, between different large and small nations’ IP policies, and between IP strategies of firms and IP policies of nations. Such interactions are essential to consider for future research, as are the roles of IPRs and IP management in innovation systems with various degrees of openness.

[1]  K. Pavitt,et al.  R&D Patenting and Innovative Activities : A Statistical Exploration : Research Policy , 1982 .

[2]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983 , 1989 .

[3]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .

[5]  N. Harabi,et al.  Appropriability of technical innovations an empirical analysis , 1995 .

[6]  Brian D. Wright The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts , 1983 .

[7]  Henry Mintzberg Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[9]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[10]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[11]  M. Reitzig How Executives Can Enhance IP Strategy and Performance , 2007 .

[12]  A. Arora PATENTS, LICENSING, AND MARKET STRUCTURE IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[13]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Large Firms in the Production of the World's Technology: An Important Case of “Non-Globalisation” , 1991 .

[14]  O. Williamson Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange , 1983 .

[15]  Gaétan de Rassenfosse How SMEs exploit their intellectual property assets: evidence from survey data , 2011, Small Business Economics.

[16]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The economics and management of technology trade: towards a pro-licensing era? , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[17]  M. Rogers,et al.  Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth , 2010 .

[18]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[19]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Marcus Holgersson Patent Management in Entrepreneurial SMEs: A Literature Review and an Empirical Study of Innovation Appropriation, Patent Propensity, and Motives , 2013 .

[21]  Caroline Wigren,et al.  The Spirit of Gnosjö : The Grand Narrative and Beyond , 2003 .

[22]  A. Damodaran Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset , 1995 .

[23]  R.E. Floyd,et al.  Intellectual Property Law for Engineers and Scientists , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[24]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[25]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[26]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Historical evolution of technological diversification , 2004 .

[27]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[28]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[29]  B. Lev Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting , 2001 .

[30]  David H. Hsu,et al.  PATENTS AS QUALITY SIGNALS FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURES. , 2008 .

[31]  W. Gartner What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship , 1990 .

[32]  D. Gregori,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[33]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Reply: Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking , 2007 .

[34]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Unemployment And Technical Innovation , 1982 .

[35]  J. Barney Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[36]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[37]  O. Granstrand Industrial Innovation Economics and Intellectual Property , 2011 .

[38]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[39]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights, Strategic Technology Agreements and Market Structure, The Case of GSM , 2002 .

[40]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[41]  F. Scherer A Note on Global Welfare in Pharmaceutical Patenting , 2002 .

[42]  J. Roos,et al.  Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape , 1997 .

[43]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[44]  A. Gambardella,et al.  Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry , 1998 .

[45]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  The economics of the european patent system , 2007 .

[46]  L. Thurow,et al.  Needed: a new system of intellectual property rights. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[47]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[48]  T. Lawson Economics and Reality , 1997 .

[49]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent.: an exploration of CIS micro data , 1999 .

[50]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  To Be Financed or Not - The Role of Patents for Venture Capital Financing , 2009 .

[51]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  Technology diversification in "MUL-TECH" corporations , 1994 .

[52]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[53]  Bronwyn H Hall Exploring the Patent Explosion , 2004, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[54]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[55]  Robert Blackburn,et al.  Intellectual property management in the small and medium enterprise (SME) , 1998 .

[56]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies , 1997 .

[57]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[58]  Gordon McConnachie The Management of Intellectual Assets: Delivering Value to the Business , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[59]  F. Kodama,et al.  Technological Diversification of Japanese Industry , 1986, Science.

[60]  B. Balassa Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage , 1965 .

[61]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Intellectual property and open innovation: an empirical analysis , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[62]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[63]  Paola Giuri,et al.  Inventors and invention processes in Europe , 2007 .

[64]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[65]  P. Klemperer How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be , 1990 .

[66]  Nick Bontis,et al.  World Congress on Intellectual Capital Readings , 2001 .

[67]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[68]  Nikolaus Thumm,et al.  Motives for patenting biotechnological inventions: an empirical investigation in Switzerland , 2004 .

[69]  Jorge Niosi,et al.  Explaining the propensity to patent computer software , 2005 .

[70]  O. Williamson,et al.  The mechanisms of governance , 1996 .

[71]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[72]  J Rees,et al.  Intellectual property , 2001, The Lancet.

[73]  Ove Granstrand Economics, law and intellectual property : seeking strategies for research and teaching in a developing field , 2010 .

[74]  F. Scherer New Perspectives on Economic Growth and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[75]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Productivity Puzzles and R&D: Another Nonexplanation , 1988 .

[76]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[77]  G. Jefferson,et al.  A great wall of patents: What is behind China's recent patent explosion? , 2009 .

[78]  Johnathan Mun,et al.  Real options analysis : tools and techniques for valuing strategic investments and decisions , 2012 .

[79]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations☆ , 1990 .

[80]  Richard Hall,et al.  The Management of Intellectual Assets: A New Corporate Perspective , 1989 .

[81]  O. Granstrand The Economics of IP on the Context of Shifting Innovation Paradigm , 2011 .

[82]  John Cantwell,et al.  New perspectives on the late Victorian economy: Historical trends in international patterns of technological innovation , 1991 .

[83]  O. Granstrand Patents and Innovations for Growth and Welfare , 2008 .

[84]  Mark Smith Social science in question , 1998 .

[85]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[86]  W. Ashworth,et al.  How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. , 1987 .

[87]  J. Marshall Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[88]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[89]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[90]  R. Frank Microeconomics and behavior , 1991 .

[91]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[92]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  Towards a theory of the technology-based firm 1 Paper originally presented at the workshop on `Techn , 1998 .

[93]  Emmanuel Duguet,et al.  Appropriation Strategy and the Motivations to use the Patent System: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing , 2000 .

[94]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[95]  The Anatomy of Rise and Fall of Patenting and Propensity to Patent: The Case of Sweden , 2012 .

[96]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[97]  A. Leiponen,et al.  If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies , 2009 .

[98]  Albert G Z Hu Propensity to Patent, Competition and China's Foreign Patenting Surge , 2008 .

[99]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts , 2005 .

[100]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Intellectual Property and Licensing Strategies in Open Collaborative Innovation , 2012 .

[101]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[102]  M. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[103]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[104]  E. Bohlin,et al.  External Technology Acquisition in Large Multi-Technology Corporations , 1992 .

[105]  P. Trott,et al.  WHY 'OPEN INNOVATION' IS OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES , 2009, International Journal of Innovation Management.

[106]  M. Abramovitz Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind , 1986, The Journal of Economic History.

[107]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations , 1977 .

[108]  Ian Alexander,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[109]  Dominique Foray,et al.  On the economics of R&D and technological collaborations: Insights and results from the project colline , 2003 .

[110]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  The propensity to patent , 1983 .

[111]  R. Solow A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[112]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[113]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The economics and management of intellectual property : towards intellectual capitalism , 1999 .

[114]  L. Edvinsson Developing intellectual capital at Skandia , 1997 .

[115]  Andrew Collier,et al.  Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy , 1990 .

[116]  A. Bryman,et al.  Business Research Methods , 2004 .

[117]  R. Nelson,et al.  On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope , 1990 .

[118]  Allan Afuah,et al.  Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions , 2009 .

[119]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[120]  Bernard Marr,et al.  The balanced scorecard and intangible assets: similar ideas, unaligned concepts , 2004 .

[121]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Who Does R&D and Who Patents? , 1982 .

[122]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[123]  N. Rosenberg Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910 , 1963, The Journal of Economic History.

[124]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[125]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[126]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting? , 1997 .

[127]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Aggregate convergence and sectoral specialization in innovation , 1994 .

[128]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data , 1992 .

[129]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Weak Appropriability Regimes , 2010 .

[130]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Innovation and its Discontents , 2004 .

[131]  O. Williamson The economic institutions of capitalism , 1985 .

[132]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Exploring the Tail of Patented Invention Value Distributions , 1997 .

[133]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Innovation and Incentives , 2004 .

[134]  Knut Blind,et al.  Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications , 2004 .

[135]  H. Chesbrough Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[136]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[137]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[138]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Optimal Patent Length and Breadth , 1990 .

[139]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Reconceiving Patents in the Age of Venture Capital , 1999 .

[140]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .