Towards a Reference Terminology for Ontology Research and Development in the Biomedical Domain

Ontology is a burgeoning field, involving researchers from the computer science, philosophy, data and software engineering, logic, linguistics, and terminology domains. Many ontology-related terms with precise meanings in one of these domains have different meanings in others. Our purpose here is to initiate a path towards disambiguation of such terms. We draw primarily on the literature of biomedical informatics, not least because the problems caused by unclear or ambiguous use of terms have been there most thoroughly addressed. We advance a proposal resting on a distinction of three levels too often run together in biomedical ontology research: 1. the level of reality; 2. the level of cognitive representations of this reality; 3. the level of textual and graphical artifacts. We propose a reference terminology for ontology research and development that is designed to serve as common hub into which the several competing disciplinary terminologies can be mapped. We then justify our terminological choices through a critical treatment of the ‘concept orientation’ in biomedical terminology research.

[1]  Thomas Bittner,et al.  A Theory of Granular Partitions , 2003, Foundations of Geographic Information Science.

[2]  Barry Smith Fiat Objects , 2001 .

[3]  James J. Cimino,et al.  In defense of the Desiderata , 2005, Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

[4]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  A Realism-Based Approach to the Evolution of Biomedical Ontologies , 2006, AMIA.

[5]  A. McCray The UMLS Semantic Network. , 1989 .

[6]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.

[7]  Gunnar O. Klein Concept Systems and Ontologies Recommendations based on discussions between realist philosophers and ISO / CEN experts concerning the standards addressing “ concepts ” and related terms , 2005 .

[8]  Barry Smith,et al.  Individuals, Universals, Collections: On the Foundational Relations of Ontology , 2004 .

[9]  A. Rector,et al.  Foundations for an Electronic Medical Record , 1991, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[10]  Barry Smith,et al.  Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS) , 2001 .

[11]  Kent A. Spackman,et al.  Examining SNOMED from the perspective of formal ontological principles: Some preliminary analysis and observations , 2004, KR-MED.

[12]  Ingvar Johansson,et al.  Bioinformatics and biological reality , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  Barry Smith,et al.  From concepts to clinical reality: An essay on the benchmarking of biomedical terminologies , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[15]  Jordan B. Peterson The Meaning of Meaning , 2007 .

[16]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Strategies for referent tracking in electronic health records , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[17]  James Franklin Stove's Discovery of the Worst Argument in the World , 2002, Philosophy.

[18]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  HL7 RIM: An Incoherent Standard , 2006, MIE.

[19]  Barry Smith,et al.  Beyond Concepts: Ontology as Reality Representation , 2004 .

[20]  Toni Kazic Putting Semantics into the Semantic Web: How Well Can It Capture Biology? , 2006, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[21]  L. Wittgenstein Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , 2021, Nordic Wittgenstein Review.