Empirical Waveform Decomposition and Radiometric Calibration of a Terrestrial Full-Waveform Laser Scanner

The parametric models used in Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) waveform decomposition routines are inherently estimates of the sensor's system response to backscattered laser pulse power. This estimation can be improved with an empirical system response model, yielding reduced waveform decomposition residuals and more precise echo ranging. We develop an empirical system response model for a Riegl VZ-400 terrestrial laser scanner, from a series of observations to calibrated reflectance targets, and present a numerical least squares method for decomposing waveforms with the model. The target observations are also used to create an empirical radiometric calibration model that accommodates a nonlinear relationship between received optical power and echo peak amplitude, and to examine the temporal stability of the instrument. We find that the least squares waveform decomposition based on the empirical system response model decreases decomposition fitting errors by an order of magnitude for high-amplitude returns and reduces range estimation errors on planar surfaces by 17% over a Gaussian model. The empirical radiometric calibration produces reflectance values self-consistent to within 5% for several materials observed at multiple ranges, and analysis of multiple calibration data sets collected over a one-year period indicates that echo peak amplitude values are stable to within ±3% for target ranges up to 125 m.

[1]  Jon P. Mills,et al.  Rigorous pulse detection from full-waveform airborne laser scanning data , 2010 .

[2]  C. Mallet,et al.  Processing full-waveform lidar data: Modelling raw signals , 2015 .

[3]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  B-spline deconvolution for differential target cross-section determination in full-waveform laser scanning data , 2011 .

[4]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Radiometric Calibration of Full-waveform Small-footprint Airborne Laser Scanners , 2008 .

[5]  Martin Pfennigbauer,et al.  Improving quality of laser scanning data acquisition through calibrated amplitude and pulse deviation measurement , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Bernhard Höfle,et al.  Calibration of full-waveform airborne laser scanning data for object classification , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Radiometric calibration of small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanner measurements: Basic physical concepts , 2010 .

[8]  Antero Kukko,et al.  Effect of incidence angle on laser scanner intensity and surface data. , 2008, Applied optics.

[9]  W. Wagner,et al.  3D vegetation mapping using small‐footprint full‐waveform airborne laser scanners , 2008 .

[10]  Stefano Girardi,et al.  Discrimination between marls and limestones using intensity data from terrestrial laser scanner , 2009 .

[11]  Andreas Ullrich,et al.  Waveform calibration strategies for a small-footprint laser scanner , 2008, Remote Sensing.

[12]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[13]  Andreas Ullrich,et al.  Enhancing online waveform processing by adding new point attributes , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[14]  Charles D. Ghilani,et al.  Principles of Least Squares , 2007 .

[15]  Lori A. Magruder,et al.  Lidar waveform stacking techniques for faint ground return extraction , 2010 .

[16]  Robert Nowak,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Full-Waveform Lidar Algorithms , 2011 .

[17]  Frédéric Bretar,et al.  Full-waveform topographic lidar : State-of-the-art , 2009 .

[18]  Tristan Cossio,et al.  Predicting Small Target Detection Performance of Low-SNR Airborne Lidar , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[19]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Absolute Radiometric Calibration of ALS Intensity Data: Effects on Accuracy and Target Classification , 2011, Sensors.

[21]  Billy E. Johnson,et al.  Coherent backscatter: measurement of the retroreflective BRDF peak exhibited by several surfaces relevant to ladar applications , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[22]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  TERRAIN ECHO PROBABILITY ASSIGNMENT BASED ON FULL-WAVEFORM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING OBSERVABLES , 2010 .

[23]  Martin Pfennigbauer,et al.  Categorisation of full waveform data provided by laser scanning devices , 2011, Security + Defence.

[24]  Harri Kaartinen,et al.  Remote Sensing Radiometric Calibration of Terrestrial Laser Scanners with External Reference Targets , 2022 .

[25]  Lu Zhao,et al.  Bidirectional reflectance distribution function of Spectralon white reflectance standard illuminated by incoherent unpolarized and plane-polarized light. , 2011, Applied optics.

[26]  M. Pfennigbauer,et al.  Echo Digitization and Waveform Analysis in Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2011 .

[27]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Study of surface brightness from backscattered laser intensity: calibration of laser data , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[28]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  Analysis of full-waveform LiDAR data for classification of an orange orchard scene , 2013 .

[29]  Anttoni Jaakkola,et al.  Analysis of Incidence Angle and Distance Effects on Terrestrial Laser Scanner Intensity: Search for Correction Methods , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Am Mudabeti,et al.  Remote sensing 1 , 2013 .

[31]  Uwe Soergel,et al.  A STOCHASTIC APPROACH FOR MODELLING AIRBORNE LIDAR WAVEFORMS , 2009 .

[32]  Jon P. Mills,et al.  Factors Influencing Pulse Width of Small Footprint, Full Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data , 2010 .

[33]  Michael A. Marciniak,et al.  Atmospheric-turbulence-effects correction factors for the laser range equation , 2008 .

[34]  Uwe Soergel,et al.  Relevance assessment of full-waveform lidar data for urban area classification , 2011 .

[35]  Lori A. Magruder,et al.  Landcover classification of small-footprint, full-waveform lidar data , 2009 .

[36]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches , 2007 .

[37]  Christian Briese,et al.  LASER PULSE VARIATIONS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION OF FULL-WAVEFORM LASER SCANNER DATA , 2012 .

[38]  T. Painter,et al.  Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing - definitions and case studies , 2006 .