The digital dream lab: tabletop puzzle blocks for exploring programmatic concepts

Tangible interaction links digital data with physical forms to support embodied use. Puzzle pieces, which their inherent physical syntax of connectable elements, provide a powerful and expressive metaphor on which to construct such tangible systems. Prior work has explored this potential in the domain of edutainment systems for children aimed at tasks such as learning logic, programming or organizational skills. Although this work is promising, it has largely focused on relatively advanced concepts and children of ages 7-12 years. The work presented in this paper adopts the same perspective but focuses on young children (5 and under) and a simpler range of concepts relating to the clustering and manipulation of data. To achieve this it presents the design (including results from a series of six formative field studies) and implementation of the Digital Dream Lab tabletop puzzle block system. This system, intended for installation in a museum, engages young children (aged 4-5) to explore simple programmatic concepts and the link between the physical and virtual world. The paper closes with design recommendations of future work targeting this goal, setting and age group.

[1]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[2]  Janet C. Read,et al.  User-oriented design and tangible interaction for kindergarten children , 2009, IDC.

[3]  Ross Bencina,et al.  reacTIVision: a computer-vision framework for table-based tangible interaction , 2007, TEI.

[4]  Allison Druin,et al.  Physical programming: designing tools for children to create physical interactive environments , 2002, CHI.

[5]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[6]  Allison Druin,et al.  The Role of Children in the Design Technology , 1999 .

[7]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Tangible programming in the classroom with tern , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces , 2008, TEI.

[9]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Little fingers on the tabletop: A usability evaluation in the kindergarten , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[10]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Towards the wild: evaluating museum installations in semi-realistic situations , 2011 .

[11]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Comparing the use of tangible and graphical programming languages for informal science education , 2009, CHI.

[12]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Topobo: a constructive assembly system with kinetic memory , 2004, CHI.

[13]  David Birchfield,et al.  SMALLab: a mediated platform for education , 2006, SIGGRAPH '06.

[14]  Marisa E. Campbell CHI 2004 , 2004, INTR.

[15]  Allison Druin,et al.  Mixing ideas: a new technique for working with young children as design partners , 2004, IDC '04.

[16]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  The tangible user interface and its evolution , 2008, CACM.

[17]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  The robot is the program: interacting with roBlocks , 2008, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[18]  Ali Mazalek,et al.  PuzzleTale: A tangible puzzle game for interactive storytelling , 2010, CIE.

[19]  Karen Tanenbaum,et al.  The EventTable technique: distributed fiducial markers , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[20]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  Design for Intuitive Use - Testing Image Schema Theory for User Interface Design , 2007 .

[21]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  The role of physicality in tangible and embodied interactions , 2011, INTR.

[22]  Tom Geller,et al.  Interactive Tabletop Exhibits in Museums and Galleries , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[23]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Siftables: towards sensor network user interfaces , 2007, TEI.