Cluster-Based Data Aggregation and Transmission Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks

A cluster-based data aggregation and transmission protocol (CDAT) for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is proposed. CDAT achieves a good performance in terms of lifetime by a clustering method of balancing energy consumption and data prediction transmission strategy. In clustering phase, the initial probability of node for cluster head election is derived from mathematical relation between application’s seamless coverage ratio and numbers of required cluster heads, and residual energy and node degree are also employed to elect cluster head. In data aggregation phase, Cluster heads broadcast message for node joining and aggregate sampling data after clustering. According to the temporal correlation of sampling data, cluster heads send data to base station using prediction transmission strategy while satisfying transmission precision in the data transmission phase, and the lifetime of WSNs is prolonged with this strategy. Theoretical analysis and simulation results show that CDAT outperforms LEACH (low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy) and PEGASIS (power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems) in terms of network lifetime by balancing energy consumption and decrease of transmission while satisfying desired Qos (quality of service) of application.

[1]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[2]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Maximum lifetime routing in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[3]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  Anantha P. Chandrakasan,et al.  An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[5]  Li Jianzhong and Gao Hong,et al.  Survey on Sensor Network Research , 2008 .

[6]  Sharad Mehrotra,et al.  Capturing sensor-generated time series with quality guarantees , 2003, Proceedings 19th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No.03CH37405).

[7]  Wang-Chien Lee,et al.  Dual prediction-based reporting for object tracking sensor networks , 2004, The First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2004. MOBIQUITOUS 2004..

[8]  Xueqing Wang,et al.  A Virtual Rhomb Grid-Based Movement-Assisted Sensor Deployment Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, First International Multi-Symposiums on Computer and Computational Sciences (IMSCCS'06).

[9]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Modelling Data-Centric Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[10]  Ossama Younis,et al.  HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[11]  A. Manjeshwar,et al.  TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2001.

[12]  Tarek F. Abdelzaher,et al.  AIDA: Adaptive application-independent data aggregation in wireless sensor networks , 2004, TECS.

[13]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Prediction-based monitoring in sensor networks: taking lessons from MPEG , 2001, CCRV.

[14]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.