Entanglement of assistance is not a bipartite measure nor a tripartite monotone

The entanglement of assistance quantifies the entanglement that can be generated between two parties, Alice and Bob, given assistance from a third party, Charlie, when the three share a tripartite state and where the assistance consists of Charlie initially performing a measurement on his share and communicating the result to Alice and Bob through a one-way classical channel. We argue that if this quantity is to be considered an operational measure of entanglement, then it must be understood to be a tripartite rather than a bipartite measure. We compare it with a distinct tripartite measure that quantifies the entanglement that can be generated between Alice and Bob when they are allowed to make use of a two-way classical channel with Charlie. We show that the latter quantity, which we call the entanglement of collaboration, can be greater than the entanglement of assistance. This demonstrates that the entanglement of assistance (considered as a tripartite measure of entanglement), and its multipartite generalizations such as the localizable entanglement, are not entanglement monotones, thereby undermining their operational significance.

[1]  John A. Smolin,et al.  Entanglement of assistance and multipartite state distillation , 2005 .

[2]  Gilad Gour Mixed-state entanglement of assistance and the generalized concurrence (7 pages) , 2005 .

[3]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[4]  R. Jozsa,et al.  A Complete Classification of Quantum Ensembles Having a Given Density Matrix , 1993 .

[5]  Frank Verstraete,et al.  Local vs. joint measurements for the entanglement of assistance , 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[6]  S. Popescu,et al.  Thermodynamics and the measure of entanglement , 1996, quant-ph/9610044.

[7]  V. Vedral,et al.  Classical, quantum and total correlations , 2001, quant-ph/0105028.

[8]  Barry C. Sanders,et al.  Deterministic entanglement of assistance and monogamy constraints , 2005 .

[9]  G. Vidal On the characterization of entanglement , 1998 .

[10]  O. Cohen,et al.  Unlocking Hidden Entanglement with Classical Information , 1998 .

[11]  M. Plenio Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[12]  Classical information deficit and monotonicity on local operations , 2004, quant-ph/0403167.

[13]  Andreas Winter,et al.  Partial quantum information , 2005, Nature.

[14]  W. Wootters Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits , 1997, quant-ph/9709029.

[15]  Andreas J. Winter,et al.  Distilling common randomness from bipartite quantum states , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  David P. DiVincenzo,et al.  Entanglement of Assistance , 1998, QCQC.

[17]  V. Vedral,et al.  Entanglement measures and purification procedures , 1997, quant-ph/9707035.

[18]  Ujjwal Sen,et al.  Local information as a resource in distributed quantum systems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[19]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[20]  Gilad Gour Family of concurrence monotones and its applications , 2005 .