Traits of British alien and native urban plants

1 As urbanization accelerates, interest is growing in the traits of urban plants. We classified 822 UK vascular plants on the basis of their occurrence along an urban–rural gradient in 26 710 samples of vegetation from 2508 UK 1‐km grid squares, including a wide range of rural habitats and Sheffield and Birmingham, two of the UK's largest cities. 2 Both alien and native species were classified with respect to mean proportion of urban land cover in the 1‐km grid squares in which the species occurs (urbanity), and absolute frequency in highly urban grid squares (urban frequency). Bayesian regression models were then developed for both measures, with a wide range of plant traits as explanatory variables. 3 Results for aliens and natives and for both urban measures were remarkably similar: the single, coherent picture of ‘successful urban species’ that emerges from our analysis is of robust plants of relatively fertile, dry, unshaded, base‐rich habitats. Only seed mass behaved very differently for natives and aliens; seed mass was related positively to success of urban natives, and negatively to success of urban aliens. Neither clonality, seed dispersal nor seed persistence in the soil were strongly linked to success in urban habitats. 4 Synthesis. Cities can provide opportunities for surprisingly rich floras, but the traits of species that can persist in cities are quite narrowly circumscribed. More generally, it is clear that analysis of traits reveals important patterns in floristic data that would be far from obvious from a purely floristic analysis.

[1]  S. Pickett,et al.  Linking ecological and built components of urban mosaics: an open cycle of ecological design , 2007 .

[2]  I. Kowarik,et al.  Long‐Distance Dispersal of Plants by Vehicles as a Driver of Plant Invasions , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  S. Godefroid,et al.  Urban plant species patterns are highly driven by density and function of built-up areas , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  I. Kühn,et al.  Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe , 2006 .

[5]  R. Marrs,et al.  Biotic homogenization and changes in species diversity across human-modified ecosystems , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Ran Nathan.  Long-Distance Dispersal of Plants , 2006, Science.

[7]  O. Varis.  Megacities, Development and Water , 2006 .

[8]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Biotic homogenization of the California flora in urban and urbanizing regions. , 2006 .

[9]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization , 2006 .

[10]  I. Kühn,et al.  Urbanization and homogenization – Comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany , 2006 .

[11]  Michael A. McCarthy,et al.  Plant traits and local extinctions in natural grasslands along an urban–rural gradient , 2005 .

[12]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly , 2005 .

[13]  James S. Clark,et al.  Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians , 2004 .

[14]  D. Roy,et al.  PLANTATT - attributes of British and Irish plants: status, size, life history, geography and habitats , 2004 .

[15]  M. Hermy,et al.  Plant species loss in an urban area (Turnhout, Belgium) from 1880 to 1999 and its environmental determinants , 2004 .

[16]  I. Kühn,et al.  The flora of German cities is naturally species rich , 2004 .

[17]  B. Meatyard.  New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora: By C.D. Preston, D.A. Pearman and T.D. Dines. Published by Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0 19 851067 5 (Hardback with CD). 912 pages. Price £99.95 , 2003 .

[18]  P. Armitage,et al.  The long-term impact of urbanisation on aquatic plants: Cambridge and the River Cam. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Renée M. Bekker,et al.  Life-history traits of the Northwest European flora: The LEDA database , 2003 .

[20]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: a case study of the city of Plzeň , 2003 .

[21]  M. Hill,et al.  Hemeroby, urbanity and ruderality: bioindicators of disturbance and human impact , 2002 .

[22]  R. Duncan,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF PLANT EXTINCTION AND RARITY 145 YEARS AFTER EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT OF AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND , 2000 .

[23]  D. Preston.  Engulfed by suburbia or destroyed by the plough: the ecology of extinction in Middlesex and Cambridgeshire , 2000 .

[24]  L. Walker,et al.  Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground , 1999 .

[25]  C. Blasi,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE URBAN FLORA OF DIFFERENT PHYTOCLIMATIC REGIONS IN ITALY , 1998 .

[26]  K. Thompson,et al.  Plant dispersal: the role of man. , 1997 .

[27]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[28]  J. Bakker,et al.  The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity , 1996 .

[29]  M. K. Gillespie,et al.  The ITE Land classification: Providing an environmental stratification of Great Britain , 1996, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[30]  K. Thompson,et al.  Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? , 1995 .

[31]  A. Jones,et al.  The Land Cover Map of Great Britain: an automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data , 1994 .

[32]  S. Pickett,et al.  The Application of the Ecological Gradient Paradigm to the Study of Urban Effects , 1993 .