Are Enterprise System Related Misfits Always a Bad Thing?

Fits and misfits between information systems and their organizational contexts are important to many theoretical streams in the information systems research tradition. A premise underlying this fit-related research is that a fit is generally a good thing and should therefore be pursued, whereas misfits are bad and should be eliminated. In this conceptual essay we draw upon work on enterprise information systems to question whether this premise is necessarily always the case. In doing so we make two broad contributions: first, we conceptualize the different points where we might find fits or misfits between an enterprise system and its organizational context, second, we theorize about situations where misfits may not negatively influence organizational performance. We conclude with a provocation about the simultaneous desirability and danger of fit.

[1]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Temporal Issues in Information and Communication Technology-Enabled Organizational Change: Evidence From an Enterprise Systems Implementation , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[2]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  L. Fry,et al.  Congruence, Contingency, and Theory Building , 1987 .

[4]  Herbert Spencer,et al.  Social Statics: The Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and The First of Them Developed , 1995 .

[5]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Rivalry deterrence in international markets: Contingencies governing the mutual forbearance hypothesis , 2009 .

[6]  Dale L. Goodhue,et al.  Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Inf , 1998 .

[7]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Joan Antoni Pastor,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Research: An Annotated Bibliography , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Alignment or Drift? Loose Coupling over Time in NASA's ERP Implementation , 2008, ICIS.

[10]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[11]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[12]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[13]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations , 2011 .

[14]  D. Leonard Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization , 2011 .

[15]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[18]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[19]  S. Newell,et al.  Repairing ERP , 2006 .

[20]  Danny Miller,et al.  The simplicity of competitive repertoires : An empirical analysis , 1996 .

[21]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Binate Diversity and IT at the Rolling Edge of Design Networks , 2007, ICIS.

[23]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[24]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[25]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[26]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[28]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  The Support Economy: Why Corporations Are Failing Individuals and the Next Episode of Capitalism , 2002 .

[29]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[30]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[31]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[32]  Sue Newell,et al.  Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Addressing Business Agility Challenges with Enterprise Systems , 2009, MIS Q. Executive.

[34]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding misalignment and cascading change of ERP implementation: a stage view of process analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Panoptic empowerment and reflective conformity in enterprise systems-enabled organizations , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[37]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[38]  David Gefen,et al.  A Multi-Level Approach to Measuring the Benefits of an Erp System in Manufacturing Firms , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[39]  Keng Siau,et al.  Enterprise integration with ERP and EAI , 2003, CACM.

[40]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact , 2010, MIS Q..

[41]  Constantinos J. Stefanou,et al.  The Selection Process of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems , 2000 .

[42]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[43]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Designing semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments , 1978 .

[44]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[45]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Cognitive Fit in Requirements Modeling: A Study of Object and Process Methodologies , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Misalignments in ERP Implementation: A Dialectic Perspective , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[48]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package-organisation misalignments , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[50]  D. Hambrick,et al.  TOP EXECUTIVE COMMITMENT TO THE STATUS QUO: SOME TESTS OF ITS DETERMINANTS , 1993 .

[51]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[52]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.