Differentiation of recurrent brain tumor versus radiation injury using diffusion tensor imaging in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the evaluation of new contrast-enhancing lesions and perilesional edema in patients previously treated for brain neoplasm in the differentiation of recurrent neoplasm from treatment-related injury. METHODS Twenty-eight patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions and perilesional edema at the site of previously treated brain neoplasms were retrospectively reviewed. Nine directional echoplanar DTIs with b=1000 s/mm(2) were obtained using a single-shot spin-echo echoplanar imaging. Standardized regions of interest were manually drawn in several regions. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA) and eigenvalue indices (lambda( parallel) and lambda( perpendicular)) and their ratios relative to the contralateral side were compared in patients with recurrent neoplasm versus patients with radiation injury, as established by histological examination or by clinical course, including long-term imaging studies and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS The ADC values in the contrast-enhancing lesions were significantly higher (P=.01) for the recurrence group (range=1.01 x 10(-3) to 1.66 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; mean+/-S.D.=1.27+/-0.15) than for the nonrecurrence group (range=0.9 x 10(-3) to 1.31 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; mean+/-S.D.=1.12+/-0.14). The ADC ratios in the white matter tracts in perilesional edema trended higher (P=.09) in treatment-related injury than in recurrent neoplasm (mean+/-S.D.=1.85+/-0.30 vs. 1.60+/-0.27, respectively). FA ratios were significantly higher in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) tracts adjacent to the edema in the nonrecurrence group (mean+/-S.D.=0.89+/-0.15) than in those in the recurrence group (mean+/-S.D.=0.74+/-0.14; P=.03). Both eigenvalue indices lambda( parallel) and lambda( perpendicular) were significantly higher in contrast-enhancing lesions in the recurrence group than in those in the nonrecurrence group (P=.02). As well, both eigenvalue indices lambda( parallel) and lambda( perpendicular) were significantly higher in perilesional edema than in normal white matter (P<.01 and P<.001, respectively) in both groups. CONCLUSION The assessment of diffusion properties, especially ADC values and ADC ratios, in contrast-enhancing lesions, perilesional edema and NAWM adjacent to the edema in the follow-up of new contrast-enhancing lesions at the site of previously treated brain neoplasms may add to the information obtained by other imaging techniques in the differentiation of radiation injury from tumor recurrence.

[1]  D. Langleben,et al.  PET in differentiation of recurrent brain tumor from radiation injury. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  J D Pickard,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of brain tumours at 3T: a potential tool for assessing white matter tract invasion? , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[3]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  B. Nan,et al.  Differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and radiation injury using MR spectroscopy. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  T L Chenevert,et al.  Monitoring early response of experimental brain tumors to therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[6]  R. Henry,et al.  Comparison of relative cerebral blood volume and proton spectroscopy in patients with treated gliomas. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  Julio H. Garcia,et al.  Cerebral “radiation necrosis”: Vascular and glial features , 1976, Acta Neuropathologica.

[8]  Khader M Hasan,et al.  Diffusion-tensor imaging of white matter tracts in patients with cerebral neoplasm. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Kraut,et al.  Comparison of weakness progression in inclusion body myositis during treatment with methotrexate or placebo , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[11]  P. Sundgren,et al.  MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of recurrent contrast-enhancing lesions in the posterior fossa after tumor treatment , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[12]  F. Di Salle,et al.  Proton MRS in neurological disorders. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[13]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of intracranial neoplasia and associated peritumoral edema: introduction of the tumor infiltration index. , 2004, Radiology.

[14]  V. Chong,et al.  Temporal lobe necrosis following radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: 1H MR spectroscopic findings. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Mark E Bastin,et al.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  J G Pipe,et al.  In vivo MR determination of water diffusion coefficients and diffusion anisotropy: correlation with structural alteration in gliomas of the cerebral hemispheres. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  M. Morino,et al.  Methionine positron emission tomography for differentiation of recurrent brain tumor and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery —In malignant glioma— , 2004, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[18]  John Russell,et al.  Dysmyelination Revealed through MRI as Increased Radial (but Unchanged Axial) Diffusion of Water , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  J K Smith,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  P Bachert,et al.  Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Linet,et al.  RESPONSE: Re: Brain and Other Central Nervous System Cancers: Recent Trends in Incidence and Mortality. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  G. van Kaick,et al.  Differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumor progression using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[24]  James M Provenzale,et al.  Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  P Van Tassel,et al.  Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment. , 2000, Radiology.

[26]  Yukihiko Fujii,et al.  Diffusion tensor analysis of peritumoral edema using lambda chart analysis indicative of the heterogeneity of the microstructure within edema. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  G. Johnson,et al.  Peritumoral diffusion tensor imaging of high-grade gliomas and metastatic brain tumors. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  K. Krabbe,et al.  MR diffusion imaging of human intracranial tumours , 1997, Neuroradiology.

[29]  G. Tung,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of rim-enhancing brain masses: is markedly decreased water diffusion specific for brain abscess? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  Hiroyuki Kabasawa,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging for preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in gliomas , 2005, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[31]  W. Hall,et al.  Improving diagnostic yield in brain biopsy: Coupling spectroscopic targeting with real‐time needle placement , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  R C McKinstry,et al.  Evaluating pediatric brain tumor cellularity with diffusion-tensor imaging. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  K. Kono,et al.  The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[34]  J. M. Taylor,et al.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  Jan Wolber,et al.  Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation , 2002, The Lancet.

[36]  P. Lauterbur,et al.  Apparent diffusion tensor measurements in myelin‐deficient rat spinal cords , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Associations among Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Apparent Diffusion Coefficients, and Image-Guided Histopathology with Special Attention to Radiation Necrosis , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[38]  Khader M Hasan,et al.  Diffusion tensor eigenvector directional color imaging patterns in the evaluation of cerebral white matter tracts altered by tumor , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  Philip H. Gutin,et al.  Radiation Injury to the Nervous System , 1991 .

[40]  V. Jellús,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[41]  Mark E Bastin,et al.  Measurements of water diffusion and T1 values in peritumoural oedematous brain , 2002, Neuroreport.

[42]  C. Eskey,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: tumor recurrence versus radiation injury. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[43]  N. Newman,et al.  Diffusion weighted imaging in radiation necrosis , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[44]  Robert Turner,et al.  Diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in brain tumors , 1993, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.